Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 643 users in the forums

Anonymous team's preliminary draft board

Browse 49ers books and videos
Why do we think this is real? Why would a team ever release this info?
Originally posted by Draftology:
Why do we think this is real? Why would a team ever release this info?

Maybe they like josh Rosen and want his stock to drop
Originally posted by Draftology:
Why do we think this is real? Why would a team ever release this info?

I wouldn't have thought the writer would lie. Any teams with a low first round pick, or maybe one without one and no wish to trade up, might do this just to help the writer out.
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Josh Allen's upside is off the charts. He's 6'5" 237 lbs. with a rocket for an arm. He may end up being the best of all the QB's in the long term. He is wildly inconsistent, makes some bad mistakes and has not proven he is consistent. But there is no doubt his upside is absolutely huge. He can do some things the other QB's can't do. His arm strength is the best of the group as is his size, height, stature and frame. You can't teach some of things he has.

Just on physical talent Allen is the best QB in the draft. His pro day showed off his arm strength. Is he a finished product, no way. Ideally he'll need a QB savvy coach and a backup role for a year in order to learn the game.
Does anyone have examples of success stories of raw QBs with accuracy issues? But a rocket arm that got them drafted.

Overwhelmingly most are fail stories. And im struggling to think of one that worked out fine
Originally posted by lamontb:
How do we know this is really any teams big board?

This
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by 49ers808:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by 49ers808:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by 49ers808:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Originally posted by 49ers808:
Josh Allen the 2nd best player in the draft?!

Josh Allen's upside is off the charts. He's 6'5" 237 lbs. with a rocket for an arm. He may end up being the best of all the QB's in the long term. He is wildly inconsistent, makes some bad mistakes and has not proven he is consistent. But there is no doubt his upside is absolutely huge. He can do some things the other QB's can't do. His arm strength is the best of the group as is his size, height, stature and frame. You can't teach some of things he has.

We talking about best player in the draft man. Not whose getting selected where. His upside is there for sure. But he is not the 2nd best player in the draft and not even close. If you think so that's fine, entitled to your opinion and so am I and I wholeheartedly disagree
this thread is someone's draft board, not best players in the draft. big difference

It is someone's draft board and it also says it's their TOP 15 players in the draft.
yes Their top 15, not the top 15

isn't that what I said, "their top 15" which means they think he's the 2nd best player in the draft?
no, Thats the top need they need to fill

if we both had teams.. our draft boards would be different do to what needs we have to fill.

You're right on that one, our boards would be VERY different. I would base my board on Best Player Available and never base it on needs.
Doesn't look that bad to me to be honest. Not sure why some people question it. QBs have always been overvalued and will continue to be as they are the most vital position in all of football. I'm sure the Browns, Giants, Jets, Bills, Broncos, Cardinals draft boards are very similar to this one.

[ Edited by a49erfan77 on Mar 28, 2018 at 7:17 AM ]
Originally posted by Buchy:
I don't get why some people can't grasp positional value. This is a team that need a a QB, it doesn't mean that those guys are the best players in the draft, it means there's a premium on the position.

Barkley is easily the best player in the draft, but the value of the running back position is incredibly low because it's possible to get production from later round picks.

That's not how a board is supposed to work from my understanding however. You rank based on talent, so that when talent and rank don't match, you caneed determine whether to move up, down, or stay put. Of course the other teams drafting near you can affect strategy as well, but there is no way the QBs should be at the top of anyone's board.
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
I agree with you. You reach - you reach for a franchise QB. Everyone understands this. They often don't pan out, but if they do you are set for a dozen or so years of competitive football. I am not high on Fitzpatrick either. I'd rather have James.

Why reach for a statistical outlier? He has amazing arm strength but poor arm talent.
Originally posted by a49erfan77:



This. Teams don't really sit down to cram and finalize their boards until a couple of weeks before the draft.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone