Rams will have more wins than us. Goff is going to play better this year. Not top 10 or even top 15 but he'll play better. Enough to win 6-7 games.
I think it goes Jets, Bears, 49ers, Jags, Browns.
There are 643 users in the forums
Random NFL Scout projects top 5 2018 NFL Draft Order
- 1 2
Browse 49ers books and videos
Sep 3, 2017 at 8:48 PM
- LeProfessionnel
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,418
Sep 3, 2017 at 8:52 PM
- LeProfessionnel
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,418
Or Jets, Jags, 49ers, Browns, Bears.
If our defense plays well we'll win 5 games. If not, we'll probably win 3.
If our defense plays well we'll win 5 games. If not, we'll probably win 3.
Sep 4, 2017 at 8:20 AM
- FL9er
- Veteran
- Posts: 10,889
This thread will be used to track the top 10 draft order during the season if that's ok.
Sep 4, 2017 at 9:10 AM
- Force_Choke
- Veteran
- Posts: 672
Man, if Hoyer goes down we should give the Jets a real run at number #1. He doesn't exactly have the best injury track record.
Sep 4, 2017 at 10:19 AM
- evil
- Veteran
- Posts: 46,731
Originally posted by FL9er:This thread will be used to track the top 10 draft order during the season if that's ok.
Oct 3, 2017 at 12:23 PM
- FL9er
- Veteran
- Posts: 10,889
This is old based on last year coming into this year, but it looks like the 49ers and Browns have identical SOS:
http://www.espn.com/blog/nflnation/post/_/id/234722/2017-nfl-strength-of-schedule
F*cking Cleveland.
Cleveland 0-4
SF 0-4
NY Giants 0-4
LAC 0-4
Please start winning Chicago and Indianapolis, Miami, Minnesota, and any other sucky team that isn't in need of a QB (kind of an oxymoron I know).
http://www.espn.com/blog/nflnation/post/_/id/234722/2017-nfl-strength-of-schedule
F*cking Cleveland.
Cleveland 0-4
SF 0-4
NY Giants 0-4
LAC 0-4
Please start winning Chicago and Indianapolis, Miami, Minnesota, and any other sucky team that isn't in need of a QB (kind of an oxymoron I know).
Oct 3, 2017 at 12:37 PM
- Hysterikal
- Veteran
- Posts: 39,908
Originally posted by FL9er:This is old based on last year coming into this year, but it looks like the 49ers and Browns have identical SOS:
http://www.espn.com/blog/nflnation/post/_/id/234722/2017-nfl-strength-of-schedule
F*cking Cleveland.
Cleveland 0-4
SF 0-4
NY Giants 0-4
LAC 0-4
Please start winning Chicago and Indianapolis, Miami, Minnesota, and any other sucky team that isn't in need of a QB (kind of an oxymoron I know).
I'd be scared of any team that doesn't need a QB also. Trading up for Rosen will be expensive as all hell but Browns have the ammunition to do so if they aren't happy with Kizer at years end. Plus Charger and Giants should honestly be looking for the future QB of their team.
Oct 3, 2017 at 12:43 PM
- FL9er
- Veteran
- Posts: 10,889
Oct 3, 2017 at 2:07 PM
- Hysterikal
- Veteran
- Posts: 39,908
Originally posted by FL9er:Here:
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000855910/article/2018-nfl-draft-order-and-needs-for-every-team
Lol Beathard will stop us from wanting a QB. But Dalton who would be in my opinion the ceiling for Beathard doesn't stop the Bengals from needing a QB.
Oct 3, 2017 at 9:12 PM
- adrianlesnar
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,476
Giants and chargers could be picking high and looking for their next QB. Bills and Brown's could be needing QBs and have enough ammunition to move up. If we want our choice of QB, we need to be #1 overall.
Oct 3, 2017 at 9:30 PM
- FredFlintstone
- Veteran
- Posts: 46,741
Giants already tried trading up for mahomes, I can almost guarantee they'll be taking a qb
Oct 3, 2017 at 9:56 PM
- Jasta
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,729
Cardinals might be with in striking distance of the top 5 as well and they'd be mad not to get a QB.
Oct 3, 2017 at 10:35 PM
- btthepunk
- Veteran
- Posts: 23,327
Originally posted by FredFlintstone:Giants already tried trading up for mahomes, I can almost guarantee they'll be taking a qb
How did Webb look in the preseason?
Oct 4, 2017 at 1:31 AM
- Kolohe
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 67,003
Originally posted by FredFlintstone:
Giants already tried trading up for mahomes, I can almost guarantee they'll be taking a qb
I thought that was just speculation?
- 1 2