The more I watch this kid the more I somewhat want him.
I'm a huge Hooker fan

, and want him regardless, but if this is the pick I will be ok with it.
One thing I don't get though is people saying we don't need a D-lineman because we have enough depth and talent at the position already. I don't think it matters how much talent you have at the d-line, its not like the QB position where your back ups dont play.
When Seattle dominated the Broncos in the SB one thing that was apparent was the depth they had, their 2nd string d-lineman were one of the main reasons that team had such a dominant defense.
Looking back on that squad, they started
Avril-Bennet-McDonald-Clemons
The D-lineman subs for that game were..
DE- Red Bryant (later signed a 4 year 17mil contract with Jags)
DT- Brandon Mebane (Just signed a 3 year 13.5 mil contract with Chargers)
DE- O'Brien Schofield (Signed a contract 2 year 8 million with Giants)
DT- Tony McDaniel (still with team signed an extension worth 2-3 million)
Clearly the Hawks had too much depth at D-line lol, shame on them
Another example I can't help but compare this to is the Jets draft of 2015
At the time, the Jets had 2 of the best defensive lineman in NFL football (Wilk and Richardson)
Yet they found themselves at #6 with a chance to take Leonard Williams out of USC.
Kevin White was still there (they needed a WR) Vic Beasely was still there (they needed a pass rusher)
Yet they took BPA with Williams and fast forward to now, I would say it was the right decision.
Wouldn't be against Thomas