Mitch "Mr Biscuit" Trubisky-QB-North Carolina

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by okdkid:
I don't understand any the hate on either Trubisky, Watson or Kizer. To me they're equal overall prospects with different strengths/weaknesses.

I don't think that either are elite prospects by any stretch of the imagination. But these guys get clustered together across multiple draft boards for a reason. It's just a matter of preference. In regard to Kizer, he looks like a young Ben Roethlisberger. I'm interested to see how he does in the offseason workouts when he's working with equal talent. Kizer, of these three, requires the least amount of projection to a pro offense. Though it's always a risk with any prospect.

They're all strong armed QBs who can make things happen in and out of the pocket in their own way. It's a good start.

Yeah I agree...I think it also depends on the system they play in. Kizer would benefit from a zona, Pitt, or celevland offense and I can see turbisky and Watson being a better fit for a WCO type of offense.

I'd love to have Kyle shanahan as the HC and give him turbisky. Move back up into the 1st and go after Corey Davis.

Then go hard on defense the rest of the draft.

Turbisky
Davis
Fields

Would make for a great start and add in a center in FA.

Originally posted by 49ers808:

That's fine everyone's entitled to their own opinion. I like him, like I said, just not at #2. If I had to take a QB at #2 it would be Kizer or Watson for me. And I didn't say he's not a leader of that team, I said he's not a vocal leader. He's more of that lead by example type, which there's nothing wrong with. I prefer a QB to have both qualities and to be borderline arrogant

Originally posted by Kolohe:

I'm gonna come out and say that if Kyle Shanahan became the head coach of the San Francisco 49ers I would embrace Deshaun Watson as the QB.

Yes I said it!!!!

Originally posted by jcs:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

I actually think he's the leader of that UNC team and it shows on game day. I see a similar throwing motion to Russell Wilson and I feel like they have a lot of similar qualities. Both are calm and cool in the pocket, both have strong arms, both can extend plays but are looking downfleid first, both are accurate.

I just don't see the bortles comps other than the coming out of nowhere similarly...sorry.

I don't see that comparison. Wilson has a very traditional over the top motion and he needs it because he's so short. Trubisky has a half side arm/traditional delivery.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by 49ers808:

That's fine everyone's entitled to their own opinion. I like him, like I said, just not at #2. If I had to take a QB at #2 it would be Kizer or Watson for me. And I didn't say he's not a leader of that team, I said he's not a vocal leader. He's more of that lead by example type, which there's nothing wrong with. I prefer a QB to have both qualities and to be borderline arrogant

Word...I don't really see kizer as a vocal leader at all? I just don't see what everyone's infatuation with kizer is...no accurate, poor pocket presence, I hacent seen those leadership qualities...I mean upside is through the roof but that's always a "if" he needs to be surrounded by a good team with a good offensive minded HC.

But too each their own

Originally posted by Tman:

Agree, I don't see Wilson at all. Much more Phillip Rivers imo, Mitch is like an athletic version of rivers

Originally posted by Tman:

Originally posted by jcs:

Originally posted by NYniner85:
I actually think he's the leader of that UNC team and it shows on game day. I see a similar throwing motion to Russell Wilson and I feel like they have a lot of similar qualities. Both are calm and cool in the pocket, both have strong arms, both can extend plays but are looking downfleid first, both are accurate.

I just don't see the bortles comps other than the coming out of nowhere similarly...sorry.

I don't see that comparison. Wilson has a very traditional over the top motion and he needs it because he's so short. Trubisky has a half side arm/traditional delivery.

Agree, I don't see Wilson at all. Much more Phillip Rivers imo, Mitch is like an athletic version of rivers

Originally posted by Tman:

It's not everyone's infatuation with Kizer, just ranking him in with top 3 like most draftniks already are doing. I know a few posters like yourself don't like him at all but like you said too each their own.

Originally posted by mayo49:

I disagree, I don't see the Rivers comparison. Rivers has a real exaggerated side arm throw. Trubisky will dip down when he's rolling out, but otherwise he looks normal to me.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Tman:

It's not everyone's infatuation with Kizer, just ranking him in with top 3 like most draftniks already are doing. I know a few posters like yourself don't like him at all but like you said too each their own.

No I get it...the proof will be in the pudding end of the day. Just hard for me to look at his games this yr and say he's in the same category as the other two. Seems to me like we have some ND fans in here

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Tman:

Agree, I don't see Wilson at all. Much more Phillip Rivers imo, Mitch is like an athletic version of rivers

How so? Where is this awkward side arm motion? He doesn't have some hitch in his throwing motion like rivers at all

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Tman:

Agree, I don't see Wilson at all. Much more Phillip Rivers imo, Mitch is like an athletic version of rivers

How so? Where is this awkward side arm motion? He doesn't have some hitch in his throwing motion like rivers at all

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
Reminds me so much of Wilson