The QB class next year is pretty weak, don't expect Watson to be in the TOP 10..
and if we did need to draft a QB between 13 to 20 in next year's draft, then we should trade up again..
the logic here is that, if we like the players enough, and they are available in the mid 2nd, why not get them now???
There are 846 users in the forums
Jumping back into round 2!
Apr 29, 2016 at 11:05 AM
- 9moon
- Veteran
- Posts: 22,365
Apr 29, 2016 at 11:10 AM
- Kolohe
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 67,633
Originally posted by 9moon:
The QB class next year is pretty weak, don't expect Watson to be in the TOP 10..
and if we did need to draft a QB between 13 to 20 in next year's draft, then we should trade up again..
the logic here is that, if we like the players enough, and they are available in the mid 2nd, why not get them now???
Luke Falk man c'mon Luke Falk.
Apr 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM
- KyleShanahan
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,779
I like it. We need quality over quantity. The last few drafts have been quantity drafts and we have a solid young nucleus now, but its now time to get some stars!
Apr 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM
- matt49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,676
In general I would disagree with trading a ton of our picks away to do this. This year is a bit unique, new HC and a roster that has a bunch of guys who are young and can be at least decent depth. What we lack is high end starters at a lot of positions. We already got 2 starters, if we think we can get a 3rd in the 2nd round at CB, ILB (esp if we think Jack can play), OLB or WR than I think we need to do it.
Apr 29, 2016 at 11:14 AM
- dj43
- Moderator
- Posts: 38,595
I would not be in favor of a jump back into the 2nd. A move up in the 3rd would be more likely, depending on who was there. Packaging a player like Bethea might be an option to reduce the value of picks given up. Just not sure that is the way to go.
We have a pretty solid core of decent-to-good players. Roughly 28-30. We already have two impact players from yesterday. Getting another would be nice but I just don't see any such guys out there.
In the meantime, continue to improve the roster where ever the opportunity presents itself. We are still 12-15 players from a playoff team, IMO.
We have a pretty solid core of decent-to-good players. Roughly 28-30. We already have two impact players from yesterday. Getting another would be nice but I just don't see any such guys out there.
In the meantime, continue to improve the roster where ever the opportunity presents itself. We are still 12-15 players from a playoff team, IMO.
Apr 29, 2016 at 11:16 AM
- 9moon
- Veteran
- Posts: 22,365
Luke Falk... at the very best, will be a 2nd rounder..
Apr 29, 2016 at 11:16 AM
- fan49
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,293
here comes the 2nd or 3rd for kaep
Apr 29, 2016 at 11:17 AM
- Kolohe
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 67,633
Originally posted by fan49:
here comes the 2nd or 3rd for kaep
lolz where.
Apr 29, 2016 at 11:17 AM
- fan49
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,293
Originally posted by Kolohe:just hoping... jets.?.?
lolz where.
[ Edited by fan49 on Apr 29, 2016 at 11:17 AM ]
Apr 29, 2016 at 11:19 AM
- fan49
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,293
i mean damn, bathea, brooks, pears, devey, patton.... could all be traded for something lol. maybe we still get a 3rd fo0r kaep from someone
Apr 29, 2016 at 11:19 AM
- 9moon
- Veteran
- Posts: 22,365
all I'm saying is that, IF we do like a player or two (very much) in the 2nd round, why not make a move now even if it includes our 1st next year.. and if by any chance, there's a player in next year's draft that we like very much in the 1st round, then sacrifies the 2018's first rounder.
This Baalke's way will never end because of the way he loves to keep his picks.. When we were a contender, we had so much picks that those guys should be developing right now to continue the power of our team.. instead, he drafted projects after projects and we have nothing to show for it..
This Baalke's way will never end because of the way he loves to keep his picks.. When we were a contender, we had so much picks that those guys should be developing right now to continue the power of our team.. instead, he drafted projects after projects and we have nothing to show for it..
Apr 29, 2016 at 11:19 AM
- 9erred
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,196
Originally posted by okdkid:
I don't think we have the ammo to get back into the 1st half of the 2nd round. Perhaps picks 45-60. But we don't have our early 4th round pick. Not sure how we pull that off. Plus, there are so many talented players still on the board. Not sure it's worth it to trade up.
This, last year a lot of talent fell to round 3. The Niners do not have the ammo, and looking at their tough schedule it would be unwise to give up next years pick. At the third round pick, which is a top 75 pick the niners will be able to get BPA out of one of the positions, I listed them in order of need
1. QB- If Christian Hackenberg is on the board
2. ILB
3. OT
4. CB
Apr 29, 2016 at 11:21 AM
- fan49
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,293
if baalke is really on the spot for his job, i could easily seeing any gm trading for 2nd day picks, and screwing the next gm if he wiffs. if he picks well hell be ok
[ Edited by fan49 on Apr 29, 2016 at 11:24 AM ]
Apr 29, 2016 at 11:25 AM
- okdkid
- Veteran
- Posts: 23,729
Originally posted by fan49:
if baalke is really on the spot for his job, i could easily seeing any gm trading for 2nd day picks, and screwing the next gm if he wiffs. if he picks well hell be ok
If that was true he would've spend a crapload of money in FA to win right now.
Apr 29, 2016 at 11:27 AM
- GorefullBore
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,454
Originally posted by English:Originally posted by 9moon:WHY NOT TRADE OUR NEXT YEARS 1ST (2017) FOR THE TITANS TWO SECOND (43 & 45)..
A) because it would be a bad deal for them.
B) because trading away your next year's first is generally a dumb thing to do.
If a QB develops into a potential franchise type guy we would be S.O.L . and have no shot at him, so that could be a bad deal for us too.