There are 371 users in the forums

The Draft Lottery Thread

Jan 3, 2016 at 4:59 PM
  • mayo49
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 65,216
Main thing now is to make sure Tomsula gets fired.
The above videos are auto-populated by an affiliate.
Jan 3, 2016 at 5:09 PM
We should trade the first to NE for Jimmy Garropolo.
Jan 3, 2016 at 5:13 PM
Cleveland could possibly take a QB. Lynch probably is a better fit for them then Goff but, who knows what they do at #2.
Jan 3, 2016 at 5:14 PM
Originally posted by mayo49:
At least the two teams that jumped ahead of us don't need a QB.

So does that mean that they are more likely to trade out of the spot to Teams that do need a QB?
Jan 3, 2016 at 5:16 PM
Originally posted by okdkid:
Dane Brugler @dpbrugler
Draft Order:
1 TEN
2 CLE
3 SD
4 DAL
5 JAX
6 BAL
7 SF
8 MIA
9 TB
10 NYG
11 CHI
12 NO
13 PHI
14 OAK
15 STL
16 DET
17 ATL
18 IND
19 BUF
20 NYJ
Re-draft Aldon at 7 again.....
Jan 3, 2016 at 5:16 PM
  • okdkid
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 23,658
Originally posted by Oakland-Niner:
Re-draft Aldon at 7 again.....

Haha! This time with 100% less booze.
Jan 3, 2016 at 5:17 PM
  • mayo49
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 65,216
Originally posted by socal9er42:
Originally posted by mayo49:
At least the two teams that jumped ahead of us don't need a QB.

So does that mean that they are more likely to trade out of the spot to Teams that do need a QB?

Possible.
Jan 3, 2016 at 5:17 PM
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by Oakland-Niner:
Re-draft Aldon at 7 again.....

Haha! This time with 100% less booze.

I need 100% more booze after this piehole of a season.
Jan 3, 2016 at 5:17 PM
  • okdkid
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 23,658
Originally posted by socal9er42:
Originally posted by mayo49:
At least the two teams that jumped ahead of us don't need a QB.

So does that mean that they are more likely to trade out of the spot to Teams that do need a QB?

All things are possible. There are several very good non-QBs. Should somebody drop, I could easily see the Niners moving back a few spots and getting another 2nd or future 1st. So many needs on this team.
Jan 3, 2016 at 5:18 PM
They really messed that up. All they had to do was lose. Plus we could not get any other games to go our way. But most importantly we needed to lose.
Jan 3, 2016 at 5:22 PM
  • okdkid
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 23,658
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
They really messed that up. All they had to do was lose. Plus we could not get any other games to go our way. But most importantly we needed to lose.

The way the games worked out today: #5 was the best we could do with a loss or tie. We dropped 2 spots. It is what it is. Lots of great players will be available at #7.
Jan 3, 2016 at 5:24 PM
Originally posted by okdkid:
The way the games worked out today: #5 was the best we could do with a loss or tie. We dropped 2 spots. It is what it is. Lots of great players will be available at #7.

Yes but 2 more great players were available at #5.
Jan 3, 2016 at 5:26 PM
Jax and Baltimore won't be looking for QB's, but it does give someone the opportunity to trade ahead of SF. Of course, they could give up another big and move up to talk a QB themselves. Assuming Goff is their guy, what is his worth over the next guy up?
Jan 3, 2016 at 5:26 PM
  • okdkid
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 23,658
Originally posted by LottOfDefense:
Originally posted by okdkid:
The way the games worked out today: #5 was the best we could do with a loss or tie. We dropped 2 spots. It is what it is. Lots of great players will be available at #7.

Yes but 2 more great players were available at #5.

No doubt. It would've been better, for sure. But the overreaction is a bit much. We're in great position to draft impact players thru the entire draft.
Jan 3, 2016 at 5:30 PM
A third to NO for Payton.

A first to NE for Jimmy Garropolo.

Sign Wilkerson in FA.

Make it happen Cap'n!
Search
YouTube
Flipboard
Instagram
Threads
✕
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone