Originally posted by okdkid:
It's his right to stand his ground on what he believes is a fair deal. However, if the timing of the payment was a non-starter for Bosa's camp -- he should have made that clear pre-draft. If he did he likely would have slipped in the draft.
That's why the Chargers will just wait him out. This is not as serious to Bosa as it is to the Chargers. No rookie deal he would sign in 2017 can make up the money he will lose if he misses 2016. That's just basic math.
If he sits out the year: 1) He misses out on present dollars, 2) He will drop in next year's draft and lose on the rookie wage scale, 3) He is one year older and increasingly less likely to cash in on two big time FA contracts.
The Chargers know it, Bosa knows it. This is just a matter of time.
Not sure why you think the Chargers have all the leverage here. Even with no offset language or money up front or whatever it is Bosa is asking for, the Chargers are better off having him than not having him on the roster. Under the current CBA, rookies are paid significantly less than market value, so Bosa would still be getting a raw deal even with whatever bells and whistles he's asking for in the deal.
Bosa and his agent know this.
If one side had all the leverage, there would be no holdout, because it would be inevitable that one side would cave, so they'd be dragging each other through the mud for no reason.
In general, CBA's tend to favor veterans at the expense of rookies. The players with all the say in bargaining agreements tend to be veterans looking after themselves and they players who need money the most (rookies) get screwed. It also bothers me that the maximum contract in the NBA is based on leagues played in the year. There's no reason a falling 30+ year old star should be eligible to get paid more than a 25 year old who is just as good and will likely be much better over the next 5 years.