There are 359 users in the forums
Cody Latimer, WR, Indiana... all hype? or overlooked awesomeness?
Apr 21, 2014 at 9:29 AM
- 4evrfan
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,061
The guy looks pretty impressive on tape. I certainly wouldn't be disappointed if we drafted him, maybe not with our #30 pick, but anytime thereafter. Why he hasn't been rated amongst the top receivers and is only now being touted is a mystery. The talent is evident.
Apr 21, 2014 at 9:31 AM
- Travisty13
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,267
Apr 21, 2014 at 9:47 AM
- ESWYoung08
- Veteran
- Posts: 613
The hype around him reminds me of DJ Hayden from last year. A lot of whispers. Someone will "reach" for him way earlier than he should be. I think his true value at this point is mid-late 2nd round. His overhyped value will push him to late 1st, early 2nd round.
Apr 21, 2014 at 9:50 AM
- m_brockalexander
- Veteran
- Posts: 13,376
If we end up with him or Moncrief in the second round, I would not be disappointed. The Niners need the speed on the outside and these two are the best size AND speed options at WR that should be available.
[ Edited by m_brockalexander on Apr 21, 2014 at 9:58 AM ]
Apr 21, 2014 at 10:02 AM
- Phoenix49ers
- Veteran
- Posts: 131,283
A lot of hype, very talented but also raw, huge upside but i wouldnt use anything than an early 3rd rounder for him at best.
Apr 21, 2014 at 10:12 AM
- 4evrfan
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,061
We simply can't let the "Hawks get him.
Apr 21, 2014 at 10:26 AM
- Mr.Mcgibblets
- Veteran
- Posts: 15,079
Apologies for the extra Latimer thread. I didn't remember there was one.. and I make so few threads that I didn't think to check.
Apr 21, 2014 at 10:28 AM
- WRATHman44
- Staff
- Posts: 16,945
His potential is crazy, but he doesn't seem like a WR who could jump on the field and play right now. That said, he's one of the few WR who has the physical potential to be a dominant, all around #1 in this draft. We have our starters now, so we could afford to develop him, but I don't know how I feel about spending a first on a guy who seems so raw. I would probably be pumped if we got him, but I'd also wonder about who else we could have gotten at that point, especially if we take him at 30.
I don't know if anything I just said makes sense...
I don't know if anything I just said makes sense...
Apr 21, 2014 at 10:32 AM
- WRATHman44
- Staff
- Posts: 16,945
Originally posted by m_brockalexander:
If we end up with him or Moncrief in the second round, I would not be disappointed. The Niners need the speed on the outside and these two are the best size AND speed options at WR that should be available.
I really like Moncrief. I feel that he plays faster than Latimer, but I really like that Latimer seems more comfortable catching away from his body. I'd be cool with either, as well. So many good WR in this draft. Latimer/Moncrief early, Ellington/Herron mid, maybe Reese late...
This is gonna be a fun draft to watch.
Apr 21, 2014 at 10:37 AM
- Mr.Mcgibblets
- Veteran
- Posts: 15,079
What is with all of this "he's raw" talk anyway? If you look at games played for all of the WRs that most feel are above him... then why is 32 games considered "raw"?
Latimer - 32
Watkins - 36 gp
Evans - 26
Lee - 36
Benjamin - 28
Cooks - 38
OBJ3 - 40
Adams - 26
Moncrief - 38
Mathews - 51
Latimer - 32
Watkins - 36 gp
Evans - 26
Lee - 36
Benjamin - 28
Cooks - 38
OBJ3 - 40
Adams - 26
Moncrief - 38
Mathews - 51
Apr 21, 2014 at 10:40 AM
- WRATHman44
- Staff
- Posts: 16,945
Originally posted by Mr.Mcgibblets:
What is with all of this "he's raw" talk anyway? If you look at games played for all of the WRs that most feel are above him... then why is 32 games considered "raw"?
Latimer - 32
Watkins - 36 gp
Evans - 26
Lee - 36
Benjamin - 28
Cooks - 38
OBJ3 - 40
Adams - 26
Moncrief - 38
Mathews - 51
Type of offense, as compared to an NFL offense, particularly how frequently it appears that his route running requires him to think on the fly, run precise routes, uncover a teammate, etc. I don't think he could jump right into an offense the same way that someone like Brandin Cooks could (I am not certain I want Cooks, just a comparison of polish, IMO).
Apr 21, 2014 at 10:40 AM
- WRATHman44
- Staff
- Posts: 16,945
YARGHHHH!!!
double post
double post
[ Edited by WRATHman44 on Apr 21, 2014 at 10:41 AM ]
Apr 21, 2014 at 10:48 AM
- MichaelHuffTexas
- Veteran
- Posts: 106
My standards must have gotten lower ever since trying to convince myself AJ Jenkins s**tty college tape was good but this guy looks good
Apr 21, 2014 at 10:50 AM
- OnTheClock
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 38,436
Very good football player. Is he 1st round caliber? To one team, he might be. He certainly looks the part physically and skills wise, there isn't much that needs to be tweaked. Very few issues with his game, and easily coachable. So, it all will depend.