Trade our two 1st's for Ndamukong?

doc_brown_ · 2010-01-05T17:53:22-08:00

Would you trade our two 1st rounders for the #1 overall pick to draft Ndamukong Suh? We wouldn't need to use our franchise tag on Aubrayo Franklyn and we'd have a stud DT, the kind we've been coveting for years! Also, I think this is a legitimate question because having two first round picks would definitely help the struggling Rams.

Jan 5, 2010 at 5:55 PM

kronik
Veteran
Posts: 4,316

I don't think he's big enough to play as a nose tackle in a 3-4.

It'd be nice to have him but not at the cost of going thru next season with the same OL.

Anyways, there is a counter to Suh. His name is Iupati.

Jan 5, 2010 at 5:55 PM

PA9erFaithful
Veteran
Posts: 12,458

Hell no.

Jan 5, 2010 at 5:56 PM

kstolai
Veteran
Posts: 11,313

Originally posted by PA9erFaithful:
Hell no.

Jan 5, 2010 at 6:09 PM

Negrodamus
Veteran
Posts: 13,782

o gawd. no not this again. every few days different member starts crap like this.

good luck.

[ Edited by Negrodamus on Jan 5, 2010 at 6:11 PM ]

Jan 5, 2010 at 6:42 PM

SonocoNinerFan
Veteran
Posts: 17,610

Even if we wanted Suh, #13 (1150) and #16/17 (1000 max) would only get us to # 3 or 4 . . . so we'd have to give up even more. And we shouldn't be too keen on arming the sorry a$$ Rams with a bunch of early draft picks. It's not an option.

Jan 5, 2010 at 6:59 PM

SanDiego49er
Veteran
Posts: 52,185

Jan 5, 2010 at 7:54 PM

FredFlintstone
Veteran
Posts: 46,740

FUUUUUUUUUU**********K NO!

Jan 5, 2010 at 7:59 PM

Thorhawk
Veteran
Posts: 16,622

Jan 5, 2010 at 11:27 PM

bigmike55
Veteran
Posts: 3,474

Why trade two middle of the first round picks, which could potentially become two starters next season.. for Ndamukong Suh, who is a great player in his own right when we don't even need a DT/NT. We will re-sign franklin and our front 3 are great at stopping the run already.

NOOOOO!!!!

Jan 5, 2010 at 11:30 PM

#10

Kolohe
Hall of Fame
Posts: 66,704

Originally posted by kronik:
I don't think he's big enough to play as a nose tackle in a 3-4.

It'd be nice to have him but not at the cost of going thru next season with the same OL.

Anyways, there is a counter to Suh. His name is Iupati.

LOL at the Iupati hype around here.

Jan 5, 2010 at 11:36 PM

#11

Mister49
Member
Posts: 663

NO! 'nuff said!

Jan 5, 2010 at 11:38 PM

#12

GEEK
Veteran
Posts: 19,412

Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by kronik:
I don't think he's big enough to play as a nose tackle in a 3-4.

It'd be nice to have him but not at the cost of going thru next season with the same OL.

Anyways, there is a counter to Suh. His name is Iupati.

LOL at the Iupati hype around here.

Don't you dare.

Jan 5, 2010 at 11:39 PM

#13

jojomellon
Member
Posts: 1,793

wouldnt fit anywhere in a 3-4.

Jan 5, 2010 at 11:49 PM

#14

Ether
Veteran
Posts: 1,515

Originally posted by GEEK:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by kronik:
I don't think he's big enough to play as a nose tackle in a 3-4.

It'd be nice to have him but not at the cost of going thru next season with the same OL.

Anyways, there is a counter to Suh. His name is Iupati.

LOL at the Iupati hype around here.

Don't you dare.

Who has Iupati even looked in the eyes, let alone block against, that is comparable to Ndamukong Suh?

[ Edited by Ether on Jan 5, 2010 at 11:50 PM ]