There are 406 users in the forums
Originally posted by Kolohe:
It ain't your money either. So by putting restrictions to the team, you think we can win that way? I mean if the goal is to win a Super Bowl in two to three years then okay, us fans won't get so worked up when the team doesn't do s**t.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
It ain't your money either. So by putting restrictions to the team, you think we can win that way? I mean if the goal is to win a Super Bowl in two to three years then okay, us fans won't get so worked up when the team doesn't do s**t.
I feel like you get worked up like this every FA when we don't sign all the big name guys lol
Originally posted by miked1978:
Getting younger. Honestly the only player i think that we let walk that we shouldnt have was Greenlaw. We are only 24 hours into free agency. We'll get some bargain players in here for sure.
Originally posted by Kolohe:
The 49ers have too many holes to supplement. You can get away with being cheap on the O-line, but not on the D-line. Every team that has won a Super Bowl or appeared in it has had a very good D-line. You know that. Even the supplements that they are getting aren't very effective, Kevin Givens was part of that poor run defense.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Yeah man just the process of running a team. Hell of a run with the OG Kyle squad. Almost got it done, time evolve and get the next group going.
it's not like this roster is straight s**t across the board anyway. Still have talent. It will always come down to Brock and if he's really the guy here though. The Bills purged last yr last yr and turned out fine.
Rams had no problem rebuilding that DL, this is the draft to do it. We got young guys in the secondary. Still got a top 5 RB, OT, LB, EDGE, TE. Get some young blood around them and let's go.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
The 49ers have too many holes to supplement. You can get away with being cheap on the O-line, but not on the D-line. Every team that has won a Super Bowl or appeared in it has had a very good D-line. You know that. Even the supplements that they are getting aren't very effective, Kevin Givens was part of that poor run defense.
Rams legit rebuilt their whole DL in 2 yrs. That's with no Bosa on their team and they used only 1 first rd pick.
SF can do that all this off season….I expect them to sign a guy or two there at some point. Doesn't have to be a super star. That will come via the draft. Most likely within the 1st 2RDs
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Yah, trading the farm for that crap QB Trey Lance set the 9ers back and the reason the 9ers had to look forward to free agency in the past.
Originally posted by NYniner85:My point is it's premature to call it a damn good draft.
Originally posted by DaleGribble:
Last years draft looks promising but I wouldn't call it damn good at this point.
I expect they will get better but there's no guarantee of that.
Why couldn't you call it that? Especially based off where they were drafting?
Our 1st 4 picks started at some point this yr and are slated to take on meaningful snaps this year.
There's no guarantee in anything with football, so what's your point?
Originally posted by 49ers808:
Originally posted by miked1978:
Getting younger. Honestly the only player i think that we let walk that we shouldnt have was Greenlaw. We are only 24 hours into free agency. We'll get some bargain players in here for sure.
I agree with this. You asked me a few pages ago who I would have signed; I'd also have signed Huff along with Greenlaw.
Personally; I'm not big into free agency and overpaying free agents. The only time I think you can do that is when you have a good QB on a rookie deal with a SB caliber team missing a few pieces. I don't think we are that anymore, especially with Brock needing a deal.
I know what I WOULD NOT have done; reward childish divas with new deals after they requested trades and threw tantrums.
Originally posted by NYniner85:Or they could've drafted studs with those picks nothing is guaranteed,but even so another Kinlaw or Thomas would've added more value than Lance ever did.
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Yah, trading the farm for that crap QB Trey Lance set the 9ers back and the reason the 9ers had to look forward to free agency in the past.
No it didn't. They could have drafted Kinlaw or Thomas 2.0 all the same with those picks. They still had 18 picks in those next two drafts and proceeded to overdraft players. Taking kickers and s**t TEs.
hopefully their draft philosophy they used last ur rolls into this yr.
Originally posted by Kolohe:
OK so the 49ers gonna win the Super Bowl in two years got it. Thank god we don't have to worry about the 49ers winning the Super Bowl at home, that's stupid anyway.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Yah, trading the farm for that crap QB Trey Lance set the 9ers back and the reason the 9ers had to look forward to free agency in the past.
No it didn't. They could have drafted Kinlaw or Thomas 2.0 all the same with those picks. They still had 18 picks in those next two drafts and proceeded to overdraft players. Taking kickers and s**t TEs.
hopefully their draft philosophy they used last ur rolls into this yr.
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Yah, trading the farm for that crap QB Trey Lance set the 9ers back and the reason the 9ers had to look forward to free agency in the past.
No it didn't. They could have drafted Kinlaw or Thomas 2.0 all the same with those picks. They still had 18 picks in those next two drafts and proceeded to overdraft players. Taking kickers and s**t TEs.
hopefully their draft philosophy they used last ur rolls into this yr.
Lol saying the 49ers without two 1st round picks didn't set the team back, draft wise. So you're saying you don't have faith in the 49ers drafting well yet you want this team to rely on the draft?
Originally posted by NYniner85:
More moves in SF: 49ers are releasing Leonard Floyd, per source.