Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 1,006 users in the forums

Trade for Minkah Fitzpatrick?

Trade for Minkah Fitzpatrick?

Sep 16, 2019 at 10:47 AM
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by Scottie15:
McGlinchey isn't atrocious. But he most likely could've been had in the second round. Regardless, I would gladly use a first rounder for a position of need on a player who has already proven he can play in this league in multiple positions rather than gamble on a prospect.

Raiders were taking him with the very next pick

Allegedly. Just like Seattle was allegedly taking Garnett when we selected him.

Regardless, my point still stands: take the player with less risk of being a bust in a position of need.
Sep 16, 2019 at 11:09 AM
Originally posted by Scottie15:
McGlinchey isn't atrocious. But he most likely could've been had in the second round. Regardless, I would gladly use a first rounder for a position of need on a player who has already proven he can play in this league in multiple positions rather than gamble on a prospect.

you're high if you think McG was gonna be available in the 2nd...
Sep 16, 2019 at 11:35 AM
Originally posted by Scottie15:
McGlinchey isn't atrocious. But he most likely could've been had in the second round. Regardless, I would gladly use a first rounder for a position of need on a player who has already proven he can play in this league in multiple positions rather than gamble on a prospect.

There is no chance mcg would have made it to the 2nd round lol
Sep 16, 2019 at 2:07 PM
But picking him at #9 was a reach. Regardless, I understand the need. That being said, it still doesn't change the fact that I'd rather use a mid to late first round pick on a proven player on a rookie contract like Fitzpatrick than to gamble on an unknown.
Sep 16, 2019 at 2:40 PM
https://twitter.com/PFF_Dolphins/status/1173632300174757890

Minkah Fitzpatrick was the highest-graded #Dolphins player in Week 2 - 85.0 overall - targeted 1 time in coverage (10 yards) - 2 defensive stops, forced fumble and fumble recovery #FinsUp
Sep 16, 2019 at 2:51 PM
  • Hopper
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 12,437
Originally posted by Scottie15:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Originally posted by Scottie15:
Originally posted by DickNasty:
Originally posted by English:
Originally posted by Youngone:
We don't have the piece that makes sense to Miami without dealing our first rounder which doesn't make sense.

This. We need that #1 pick.

Yes, so we can draft another solly or Reuben

Exactly. Our drafting in the first round has been atrocious, outside of the obvious picks like Bosa.

McGlinchey is atrocious? You guys make it sound like Solly and Reuben were in two different years. It was the same year because they traded up back in the first for Reuben

McGlinchey isn't atrocious. But he most likely could've been had in the second round. Regardless, I would gladly use a first rounder for a position of need on a player who has already proven he can play in this league in multiple positions rather than gamble on a prospect.

what?
Sep 16, 2019 at 2:57 PM
Originally posted by Hopper:
Originally posted by Scottie15:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Originally posted by Scottie15:
Originally posted by DickNasty:
Originally posted by English:
Originally posted by Youngone:
We don't have the piece that makes sense to Miami without dealing our first rounder which doesn't make sense.

This. We need that #1 pick.

Yes, so we can draft another solly or Reuben

Exactly. Our drafting in the first round has been atrocious, outside of the obvious picks like Bosa.

McGlinchey is atrocious? You guys make it sound like Solly and Reuben were in two different years. It was the same year because they traded up back in the first for Reuben

McGlinchey isn't atrocious. But he most likely could've been had in the second round. Regardless, I would gladly use a first rounder for a position of need on a player who has already proven he can play in this league in multiple positions rather than gamble on a prospect.

what?

Because you know the #1 rated OT is usually available in the second round of the draft.
Sep 16, 2019 at 2:58 PM
Originally posted by Scottie15:
McGlinchey isn't atrocious. But he most likely could've been had in the second round. Regardless, I would gladly use a first rounder for a position of need on a player who has already proven he can play in this league in multiple positions rather than gamble on a prospect.



Sep 16, 2019 at 3:01 PM
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Originally posted by Hopper:
Originally posted by Scottie15:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Originally posted by Scottie15:
Originally posted by DickNasty:
Originally posted by English:
Originally posted by Youngone:
We don't have the piece that makes sense to Miami without dealing our first rounder which doesn't make sense.

This. We need that #1 pick.

Yes, so we can draft another solly or Reuben

Exactly. Our drafting in the first round has been atrocious, outside of the obvious picks like Bosa.

McGlinchey is atrocious? You guys make it sound like Solly and Reuben were in two different years. It was the same year because they traded up back in the first for Reuben

McGlinchey isn't atrocious. But he most likely could've been had in the second round. Regardless, I would gladly use a first rounder for a position of need on a player who has already proven he can play in this league in multiple positions rather than gamble on a prospect.

what?

Because you know the #1 rated OT is usually available in the second round of the draft.

It's those long snapper prospects that go really early. It would be smart for us to trade up to the top 5 for one next year.

Elite tackles can be had in the 8th round.
Sep 16, 2019 at 3:18 PM
Well covered that the raiders were taking mcglinchy one pick after us in round 1.
Sep 16, 2019 at 3:29 PM
Originally posted by ltrain:
Well covered that the raiders were taking mcglinchy one pick after us in round 1.

And as evideence they REEEAAACCCCHHHHHEEEEDDDD on their pick. I mean man there's only two things to complain about with the McGlinchey pick. 1 being Derwin James. And the biggest complaint yeah I don't have to say it.
Sep 16, 2019 at 3:38 PM
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by Scottie15:
McGlinchey isn't atrocious. But he most likely could've been had in the second round. Regardless, I would gladly use a first rounder for a position of need on a player who has already proven he can play in this league in multiple positions rather than gamble on a prospect.


Nothing surprises me on the zone anymore.
Sep 16, 2019 at 4:24 PM
Originally posted by SFrush:
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by Scottie15:
McGlinchey isn't atrocious. But he most likely could've been had in the second round. Regardless, I would gladly use a first rounder for a position of need on a player who has already proven he can play in this league in multiple positions rather than gamble on a prospect.


Nothing surprises me on the zone anymore.


Especially people who miss the entire point of a post so they can support their own confirmation bias, am I right?
Sep 16, 2019 at 4:25 PM
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Originally posted by Hopper:
Originally posted by Scottie15:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Originally posted by Scottie15:
Originally posted by DickNasty:
Originally posted by English:
Originally posted by Youngone:
We don't have the piece that makes sense to Miami without dealing our first rounder which doesn't make sense.

This. We need that #1 pick.

Yes, so we can draft another solly or Reuben

Exactly. Our drafting in the first round has been atrocious, outside of the obvious picks like Bosa.

McGlinchey is atrocious? You guys make it sound like Solly and Reuben were in two different years. It was the same year because they traded up back in the first for Reuben

McGlinchey isn't atrocious. But he most likely could've been had in the second round. Regardless, I would gladly use a first rounder for a position of need on a player who has already proven he can play in this league in multiple positions rather than gamble on a prospect.

what?

Because you know the #1 rated OT is usually available in the second round of the draft.

McGlinchey was the highest rated OT? You sure about that?

Regardless, I'd gladly give up a late or middle 1st round pick for Minkah.
Sep 16, 2019 at 4:39 PM
Originally posted by Scottie15:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Originally posted by Hopper:
Originally posted by Scottie15:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Originally posted by Scottie15:
Originally posted by DickNasty:
Originally posted by English:
Originally posted by Youngone:
We don't have the piece that makes sense to Miami without dealing our first rounder which doesn't make sense.

This. We need that #1 pick.

Yes, so we can draft another solly or Reuben

Exactly. Our drafting in the first round has been atrocious, outside of the obvious picks like Bosa.

McGlinchey is atrocious? You guys make it sound like Solly and Reuben were in two different years. It was the same year because they traded up back in the first for Reuben

McGlinchey isn't atrocious. But he most likely could've been had in the second round. Regardless, I would gladly use a first rounder for a position of need on a player who has already proven he can play in this league in multiple positions rather than gamble on a prospect.

what?

Because you know the #1 rated OT is usually available in the second round of the draft.

McGlinchey was the highest rated OT? You sure about that?

Regardless, I'd gladly give up a late or middle 1st round pick for Minkah.

He was absolutely the top rated OT.

I get what you're saying, and don't really disagree. I'd give up a 1st for Minkah. 3 more years on a rookie contract and better right now than a rookie will probably be next year for us. My issue with that though is that we wouldn't have a pick until the 3rd round.
✕
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone