Trade for Minkah Fitzpatrick?

Originally posted by LVJay:

Originally posted by Scottie15:

Interesting. I don't think the secondary has been playing exceptionally well at all. Minkah would be an instant upgrade on a rookie contract.

The overall picture tho, they made a lot of big plays and the final scores indicates that they didn't screw things up.

Originally posted by Kolohe:

Bingo. Sure they're not the Legion of Boom but they make enough plays where I think Lynch wouldn't bother with such a trade. Besides I'm willing to bet that O-line is a lot higher priority for them.

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:

Originally posted by Kolohe:

Bingo. Sure they're not the Legion of Boom but they make enough plays where I think Lynch wouldn't bother with such a trade. Besides I'm willing to bet that O-line is a lot higher priority for them.

There is no Minkah level OL available to be traded. Its more about talent not position. Williams got abused in the slot and the NFC West is now chockful of dangerous slot receivers.

Originally posted by Youngone:

We don't have the piece that makes sense to Miami without dealing our first rounder which doesn't make sense.

Originally posted by GNS1310:

Still wonder if we could swap our first for their second + Minkah.
Our first could be near the end of the round and their second could....will....be near the top.
Throw in an extra later pick if need be.

Originally posted by English:

Originally posted by Youngone:

We don't have the piece that makes sense to Miami without dealing our first rounder which doesn't make sense.

This. We need that #1 pick.

Originally posted by DickNasty:

Originally posted by English:

Originally posted by Youngone:

We don't have the piece that makes sense to Miami without dealing our first rounder which doesn't make sense.

This. We need that #1 pick.

Yes, so we can draft another solly or Reuben

Originally posted by DickNasty:

Originally posted by English:

Originally posted by Youngone:
We don't have the piece that makes sense to Miami without dealing our first rounder which doesn't make sense.

This. We need that #1 pick.

Yes, so we can draft another solly or Reuben

Originally posted by English:

Originally posted by DickNasty:

Originally posted by English:

Originally posted by Youngone:
We don't have the piece that makes sense to Miami without dealing our first rounder which doesn't make sense.

This. We need that #1 pick.

Yes, so we can draft another solly or Reuben

You don't think we need another McGlinchey?

Originally posted by Scottie15:

Originally posted by DickNasty:

Originally posted by English:

Originally posted by Youngone:

We don't have the piece that makes sense to Miami without dealing our first rounder which doesn't make sense.

This. We need that #1 pick.

Yes, so we can draft another solly or Reuben

Exactly. Our drafting in the first round has been atrocious, outside of the obvious picks like Bosa.

Originally posted by Alfienator:

Originally posted by Scottie15:

Originally posted by DickNasty:

Originally posted by English:

Originally posted by Youngone:
We don't have the piece that makes sense to Miami without dealing our first rounder which doesn't make sense.

This. We need that #1 pick.

Yes, so we can draft another solly or Reuben

Exactly. Our drafting in the first round has been atrocious, outside of the obvious picks like Bosa.

McGlinchey is atrocious? You guys make it sound like Solly and Reuben were in two different years. It was the same year because they traded up back in the first for Reuben

Originally posted by Scottie15:

McGlinchey isn't atrocious. But he most likely could've been had in the second round. Regardless, I would gladly use a first rounder for a position of need on a player who has already proven he can play in this league in multiple positions rather than gamble on a prospect.