There are 329 users in the forums
WR Devante Parker
WR Devante Parker
Feb 7, 2019 at 6:52 AM
- Ninersmania
- Veteran
- Posts: 55
Why not? he has potential. 6 Milion yearly is the Limit.
The above videos are auto-populated by an affiliate.
Feb 7, 2019 at 7:49 AM
- TheXFactor
- Veteran
- Posts: 25,990
Bust for bust: Garnett for Parker. DO IT
(Fins need a RG and we need a tall redzone WR)
(Fins need a RG and we need a tall redzone WR)
[ Edited by TheXFactor on Feb 7, 2019 at 7:49 AM ]
Feb 7, 2019 at 10:09 PM
- toppdogg32
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,796
Originally posted by TheXFactor:
Bust for bust: Garnett for Parker. DO IT
(Fins need a RG and we need a tall redzone WR)
Not a bad idea at all
Feb 8, 2019 at 9:05 AM
- Waterbear
- Veteran
- Posts: 18,527
Originally posted by toppdogg32:
Originally posted by TheXFactor:
Bust for bust: Garnett for Parker. DO IT
(Fins need a RG and we need a tall redzone WR)
Not a bad idea at all
I'll allow it. We shouldn't rely on Parker though. We need to draft one or sign AB.
Feb 8, 2019 at 10:53 AM
- dj43
- Moderator
- Posts: 37,922
- NFL Pick 'em
Originally posted by TheXFactor:
Bust for bust: Garnett for Parker. DO IT
(Fins need a RG and we need a tall redzone WR)
With so many tall WRs coming out in the draft, there is little reason to spend FA money on a questionable one, or trade good interior OL depth for one.
Feb 8, 2019 at 1:03 PM
- toppdogg32
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,796
Originally posted by Waterbear:yeah, my thinking is him along with a draft pick.
Originally posted by toppdogg32:
Originally posted by TheXFactor:
Bust for bust: Garnett for Parker. DO IT
(Fins need a RG and we need a tall redzone WR)
Not a bad idea at all
I'll allow it. We shouldn't rely on Parker though. We need to draft one or sign AB.
Feb 8, 2019 at 1:06 PM
- toppdogg32
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,796
Originally posted by dj43:My thinking is if Brown doesn't land here, and also pairing him with a draft pick. Also, Ginn killing us everytime we play him, bothers the hell outta me- A change a scenery helped him blossom- thinking Parker may can do the same.
Originally posted by TheXFactor:
Bust for bust: Garnett for Parker. DO IT
(Fins need a RG and we need a tall redzone WR)
With so many tall WRs coming out in the draft, there is little reason to spend FA money on a questionable one, or trade good interior OL depth for one.
Feb 8, 2019 at 1:07 PM
- 9moon
- Veteran
- Posts: 21,920
- NFL Pick 'em
Originally posted by toppdogg32:
Originally posted by Waterbear:yeah, my thinking is him along with a draft pick.
Originally posted by toppdogg32:
Originally posted by TheXFactor:
Bust for bust: Garnett for Parker. DO IT
(Fins need a RG and we need a tall redzone WR)
Not a bad idea at all
I'll allow it. We shouldn't rely on Parker though. We need to draft one or sign AB.
agree
Feb 8, 2019 at 1:51 PM
- TheXFactor
- Veteran
- Posts: 25,990
Originally posted by dj43:
Originally posted by TheXFactor:
Bust for bust: Garnett for Parker. DO IT
(Fins need a RG and we need a tall redzone WR)
With so many tall WRs coming out in the draft, there is little reason to spend FA money on a questionable one, or trade good interior OL depth for one.
I liked what point you made, until you said Garnett was good. He hasn't proven that at all man. Hell Chilo Rachel has had more snaps than him lol
[ Edited by TheXFactor on Feb 8, 2019 at 1:51 PM ]
Feb 8, 2019 at 2:20 PM
- pdizo916
- Member
- Posts: 38,241
Originally posted by dj43:
Originally posted by TheXFactor:
Bust for bust: Garnett for Parker. DO IT
(Fins need a RG and we need a tall redzone WR)
With so many tall WRs coming out in the draft, there is little reason to spend FA money on a questionable one, or trade good interior OL depth for one.
They have 6 picks and 30 holes to fill. They don't have enough picks to fulfil their holes; hence, that's why they have free agency and trades. The 49ers should trade Garnett for a player that can actually play for them. Let's not waste a draft pick on a "type of player" that could be fulfilled via the trade route.
Feb 10, 2019 at 4:31 PM
- LasVegasWally
- Veteran
- Posts: 24,757
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by toppdogg32:
Originally posted by TheXFactor:
Bust for bust: Garnett for Parker. DO IT
(Fins need a RG and we need a tall redzone WR)
Not a bad idea at all
I'll allow it. We shouldn't rely on Parker though. We need to draft one or sign AB.
Good call Water
Feb 11, 2019 at 4:08 PM
- toppdogg32
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,796
Originally posted by LasVegasWally:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by toppdogg32:
Originally posted by TheXFactor:
Bust for bust: Garnett for Parker. DO IT
(Fins need a RG and we need a tall redzone WR)
Not a bad idea at all
I'll allow it. We shouldn't rely on Parker though. We need to draft one or sign AB.
Good call Water
whether its AB or Parker, we still draft a WR..
Feb 11, 2019 at 4:24 PM
- LasVegasWally
- Veteran
- Posts: 24,757
Originally posted by toppdogg32:
Originally posted by LasVegasWally:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by toppdogg32:
Originally posted by TheXFactor:
Bust for bust: Garnett for Parker. DO IT
(Fins need a RG and we need a tall redzone WR)
Not a bad idea at all
I'll allow it. We shouldn't rely on Parker though. We need to draft one or sign AB.
Good call Water
whether its AB or Parker, we still draft a WR..
Ditto
Feb 11, 2019 at 4:29 PM
- Waterbear
- Veteran
- Posts: 18,527
Originally posted by LasVegasWally:
Originally posted by toppdogg32:
Originally posted by LasVegasWally:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by toppdogg32:
Originally posted by TheXFactor:
Bust for bust: Garnett for Parker. DO IT
(Fins need a RG and we need a tall redzone WR)
Not a bad idea at all
I'll allow it. We shouldn't rely on Parker though. We need to draft one or sign AB.
Good call Water
whether its AB or Parker, we still draft a WR..
Ditto
The difference would be if we should draft one in the second round or not. Brown= 4th-7th round. Parker= 2nd-3rd imo.
Feb 11, 2019 at 8:14 PM
- jersey49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,607
Originally posted by Waterbear:Originally posted by LasVegasWally:Originally posted by toppdogg32:Originally posted by LasVegasWally:Originally posted by Waterbear:Originally posted by toppdogg32:Originally posted by TheXFactor:Bust for bust: Garnett for Parker. DO IT
(Fins need a RG and we need a tall redzone WR)
Not a bad idea at all
I'll allow it. We shouldn't rely on Parker though. We need to draft one or sign AB.
Good call Water
whether its AB or Parker, we still draft a WR..
Ditto
The difference would be if we should draft one in the second round or not. Brown= 4th-7th round. Parker= 2nd-3rd imo.
I agree, Parker traded or signed I want Ridley or Deebo in the 2nd or 3rd, Brown traded For i want Sills or Johnson 4-6