Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 401 users in the forums

Free Agency Rumors/Pending Signings

Sanu went to Atlanta
The above videos are auto-populated by an affiliate.
Originally posted by jreff22:
Originally posted by 9er2k:
Can we please give Mohammed Sanu a call

Somebody offered him a contract I think

I think Atlanta. No word if he accepted though.
Why would anyone come here? If I was a FA this is the very last place I would pick
Originally posted by fropwns:
Originally posted by ElephantHaley:
Yay we sucked all year and saved money for Thadeus Lewis and Lance Torn ACL Dunbar. #WINNING


LOLOLOLOLOLOL. But seriously. How many deals were actually worth it today?
As far as kaep goes it is very rare that one team holds all the power in negotiations other than top spot draft positions but thats where we are. We have the good fortune of cap space, another serviceable qb, and low expectations to hold onto kaep unless a team slips up and gives up too much

If not he competes in camp.

Either way kaep assumes all the risk.
http://www.chatsports.com/atlanta-falcons/a/report-falcons-sign-wr-mohamed-sanu-27272

Sanu is visiting Atlanta tonight and then New England.
Originally posted by btthepunk:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Originally posted by 9er2k:
Can we please give Mohammed Sanu a call

Somebody offered him a contract I think

I think Atlanta. No word if he accepted though.
Yeah for like 8 million a year. Not worth it.
Had 394 receiving yards and 0 td's last year.

edit: my mistake that was marvin jones.
[ Edited by philosoraptor on Mar 9, 2016 at 6:53 PM ]
Originally posted by KeepRabbitsOut:
Originally posted by okdkid:
Adam Caplan @caplannfl
Chip Kelly sees Dunbar as a Darren Sproles type of player (if healthy). Mismatch for LBs.



I agree. What's the problem with Dunbar? He's a fine #3 RB.

Wasnt he injured in October with knee ligaments. Sounds perfect for Baalke.


Originally posted by philosoraptor:
Originally posted by btthepunk:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Originally posted by 9er2k:
Can we please give Mohammed Sanu a call

Somebody offered him a contract I think

I think Atlanta. No word if he accepted though.
Yeah for like 8 million a year. Not worth it.
Had 394 receiving yards and 0 td's last year.

yeah i want sanu but paying anything over 4 to 5 mil a year is crazy
  • Janitor
  • HOF Food Reviews
  • Posts: 48,821



This is the stupidest and most annoying argument floating around the FA talk this year.

Everyone is completely glossing over the fact that the worst teams in the league are the ones who spend the most, because their teams have the furthest to go! OF COURSE THE PATS DIDN'T SPEND MUCH! They already have a SB roster! OF COURSE THE JAGS SPENT A TON! They have won few games in recent seasons and need to do something to try to improve their record.

Simplifying it "Amount spent and win %" is asinine and lazy
Originally posted by philosoraptor:
Originally posted by btthepunk:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Originally posted by 9er2k:
Can we please give Mohammed Sanu a call

Somebody offered him a contract I think

I think Atlanta. No word if he accepted though.
Yeah for like 8 million a year. Not worth it.
Had 394 receiving yards and 0 td's last year.

I think punters are getting over 8 mil a year today. Sounds like a bargain.

If Sanu doesn't sign in Atlanta and ends up in New England Brady will make him a star.
Dunbar looks like harris, noice
  • evil
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 46,688
Originally posted by philosoraptor:
Originally posted by btthepunk:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Originally posted by 9er2k:
Can we please give Mohammed Sanu a call

Somebody offered him a contract I think

I think Atlanta. No word if he accepted though.
Yeah for like 8 million a year. Not worth it.
Had 394 receiving yards and 0 td's last year.

edit: my mistake that was marvin jones.

Falcons reported to be offering 7 a year.
Originally posted by Janitor:



This is the stupidest and most annoying argument floating around the FA talk this year.

Everyone is completely glossing over the fact that the worst teams in the league are the ones who spend the most, because their teams have the furthest to go! OF COURSE THE PATS DIDN'T SPEND MUCH! They already have a SB roster! OF COURSE THE JAGS SPENT A TON! They have won few games in recent seasons and need to do something to try to improve their record.

Simplifying it "Amount spent and win %" is asinine and lazy

They're the worst teams in the league because they continue to spend so much and don't draft well.
Originally posted by Janitor:



This is the stupidest and most annoying argument floating around the FA talk this year.

Everyone is completely glossing over the fact that the worst teams in the league are the ones who spend the most, because their teams have the furthest to go! OF COURSE THE PATS DIDN'T SPEND MUCH! They already have a SB roster! OF COURSE THE JAGS SPENT A TON! They have won few games in recent seasons and need to do something to try to improve their record.

Simplifying it "Amount spent and win %" is asinine and lazy

It's not stupid. Those teams have to spend more because despite having top 10 pick after top 10 pick they draft losers and have to look outside the team to bring in proven players.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone