Originally posted by 49oz2superbowl:not that we needed Faneca, and he's seriously diminishing as a player... but it pains me to see the rest of the NFC West make moves to improve while we sit around and "resign our guys".... which we haven't done either.
Arizona let Rolle and Dansby walk (the 5th and 3rd best defensive players on their team respectively imo), trade for Kerry Rhodes (who is highly overrated and overpayed), and signed Derek Anderson who makes David Carr look like a hall of famer. Hardly "making moves to improve." Fanecca signing with Arizona is hardly a surprise considering two of his former coaches are coahes on the Cardinals. Will Fanneca help the run game? Undoubtedly but he's also a big liability in pass protection and I doubt he makes a significant difference in the Cardinals success at the end of the year.
The Seahwaks traded valuable picks for Charlie Whitehrst. Yes they had a great first 3 picks which steals practically fell in their laps. The Washington and White trades were savvy, however I bet you guys like Blount, Dixon, Dwyer and Scott could provide just as much value (all were power backs drafted in the 6th round with the exception of Blount). Leon Wshington could work out for them (if his leg heals which is a big if, that was a nasty injury), but it's hardly as if Seattle is making all kinds of moves.
St. Louis hasn't done s**t besides pretty much letting go of its best defensive player.
Seattle is still in rebuilding mode, Arizona is in a major transition and pinning it's hopes on party-boy Leinart and St. Louis is years away. Our moves in the draft (Two o-linemen, respected o-line coaches, Ginn trade) have in fact set us up to win now much more than the moves of our rivals, by dealing with our two biggest weaknesses last year, o-line and special teams.
not that we needed Faneca, and he's seriously diminishing as a player... but it pains me to see the rest of the NFC West make moves to improve while we sit around and "resign our guys".... which we haven't done either.