There are 298 users in the forums
Originally posted by SnakePlissken:
I think Jared Gaither would simply come in to replace Pashos (once Pashos flees back to his boyfriend OC in D.C.), and help mentor the rookie Tackle/depth of the o-line.
But if anybody thinks for one second Jared Gaither should make us think less about taking a tackle in the first round is living in Marvel Smith la-la-land.
Originally posted by pd24:Originally posted by SnakePlissken:
I think Jared Gaither would simply come in to replace Pashos (once Pashos flees back to his boyfriend OC in D.C.), and help mentor the rookie Tackle/depth of the o-line.
But if anybody thinks for one second Jared Gaither should make us think less about taking a tackle in the first round is living in Marvel Smith la-la-land.
Jared Gaither is 24 and is really good. He would not be a mentor.
Originally posted by Overkill:Originally posted by Kolohe:Originally posted by teeohh:Originally posted by Kolohe:Originally posted by Method:Originally posted by PTulini:Originally posted by pd24:Originally posted by PTulini:
I can't understand why people actually believe this bulls**t! It has no credibility what-so-ever. The Bleacher Report is someone's opinion.
I don't think people believe it, but now people are starting to think it would be a good idea to sign him and trae a 1st for him.
Yeah, so now they'll get their hopes up, then they'll b***h and complain if the 49ers don't do it or can't pull off a trade for Gaither.
Why wouldn't we "b***h and complain?"
Even Patrick Willis is "b***hing and complaining" about how lousy our front office is right now. No moves whatsoever other then David f**king Carr? Ugh
Not talking about the David Carr move, but I think the reason for not making any 1st rate signings have to do with father and son Yorks.
I thought Scott made roster decisions am I wrong?
True he does, but owners give the go ahead on money. If the Yorks really wanted to spend money on free agents, they would, see 2007.
The Yorks control the purse strings, but we've got several key young players that are looking at huge extensions in the near future.
I don't think the Yorks are cheap, just trying to build a new stadium and retain the talent we already have.
Originally posted by momoney925:Originally posted by pd24:Originally posted by SnakePlissken:
I think Jared Gaither would simply come in to replace Pashos (once Pashos flees back to his boyfriend OC in D.C.), and help mentor the rookie Tackle/depth of the o-line.
But if anybody thinks for one second Jared Gaither should make us think less about taking a tackle in the first round is living in Marvel Smith la-la-land.
Jared Gaither is 24 and is really good. He would not be a mentor.
yeah, dudes a beast
no more wasting time lets go!
Originally posted by SnakePlissken:
but will Scotty pull the trigger? Does our team have the balls to do it?
Originally posted by PA9erFaithful:Originally posted by SnakePlissken:
but will Scotty pull the trigger? Does our team have the balls to do it?
I think the real question is, would Baltimore let him go.
Originally posted by krizay:Originally posted by DaFaro49ers:Originally posted by BenQ:
we can't trade the 17th pick, we'd have to trade our 13th
Just because he is tendered for a first round pick doesnt necessarily mean that the team who accepts a trade has to recieve a first rounder.
For example, he is tendered at a 1st round level, but the Ravens own Gaither's rights right now, and can trade him for anything.
Remember when we had Brandon Lloyd tendered at a 1st round level, and the Redskins had no first round picks. We traded Brandon Lloyed away for a 3rd and 4th rounder because we owned his rights.
So technically, the 49ers can give up the 17th pick for Gaither.
You are correct. But if we actually sign him to an offer sheet and they refuse it will be our #13.
Which tells me it will either be #13 or nothing. I don't see Balt intentionally trading him for a mid teen pick just to try and draft another guy to play LT. Wouldn't make any sense.
But if we make an offer they can't match. Then they have no choice but to take the #13 and hope for the best.
Originally posted by KRS-1:Originally posted by krizay:Originally posted by DaFaro49ers:Originally posted by BenQ:
we can't trade the 17th pick, we'd have to trade our 13th
Just because he is tendered for a first round pick doesnt necessarily mean that the team who accepts a trade has to recieve a first rounder.
For example, he is tendered at a 1st round level, but the Ravens own Gaither's rights right now, and can trade him for anything.
Remember when we had Brandon Lloyd tendered at a 1st round level, and the Redskins had no first round picks. We traded Brandon Lloyed away for a 3rd and 4th rounder because we owned his rights.
So technically, the 49ers can give up the 17th pick for Gaither.
You are correct. But if we actually sign him to an offer sheet and they refuse it will be our #13.
Which tells me it will either be #13 or nothing. I don't see Balt intentionally trading him for a mid teen pick just to try and draft another guy to play LT. Wouldn't make any sense.
But if we make an offer they can't match. Then they have no choice but to take the #13 and hope for the best.
If Gaither leaves, Oher moves to LT
Originally posted by frankie:Originally posted by KRS-1:Originally posted by krizay:Originally posted by DaFaro49ers:Originally posted by BenQ:
we can't trade the 17th pick, we'd have to trade our 13th
Just because he is tendered for a first round pick doesnt necessarily mean that the team who accepts a trade has to recieve a first rounder.
For example, he is tendered at a 1st round level, but the Ravens own Gaither's rights right now, and can trade him for anything.
Remember when we had Brandon Lloyd tendered at a 1st round level, and the Redskins had no first round picks. We traded Brandon Lloyed away for a 3rd and 4th rounder because we owned his rights.
So technically, the 49ers can give up the 17th pick for Gaither.
You are correct. But if we actually sign him to an offer sheet and they refuse it will be our #13.
Which tells me it will either be #13 or nothing. I don't see Balt intentionally trading him for a mid teen pick just to try and draft another guy to play LT. Wouldn't make any sense.
But if we make an offer they can't match. Then they have no choice but to take the #13 and hope for the best.
If Gaither leaves, Oher moves to LT
i would like this trade for our 13th pick! he is a proven player ha ha i sound like a briken record im sure! didnt even read the rest of the thread ha ha! baltimore gets boldin and gives us gaither, sounds like a fair trade for our 13th pick ha ha!
Originally posted by BigDaddy:Originally posted by frankie:Originally posted by KRS-1:Originally posted by krizay:Originally posted by DaFaro49ers:Originally posted by BenQ:
we can't trade the 17th pick, we'd have to trade our 13th
Just because he is tendered for a first round pick doesnt necessarily mean that the team who accepts a trade has to recieve a first rounder.
For example, he is tendered at a 1st round level, but the Ravens own Gaither's rights right now, and can trade him for anything.
Remember when we had Brandon Lloyd tendered at a 1st round level, and the Redskins had no first round picks. We traded Brandon Lloyed away for a 3rd and 4th rounder because we owned his rights.
So technically, the 49ers can give up the 17th pick for Gaither.
You are correct. But if we actually sign him to an offer sheet and they refuse it will be our #13.
Which tells me it will either be #13 or nothing. I don't see Balt intentionally trading him for a mid teen pick just to try and draft another guy to play LT. Wouldn't make any sense.
But if we make an offer they can't match. Then they have no choice but to take the #13 and hope for the best.
If Gaither leaves, Oher moves to LT
i would like this trade for our 13th pick! he is a proven player ha ha i sound like a briken record im sure! didnt even read the rest of the thread ha ha! baltimore gets boldin and gives us gaither, sounds like a fair trade for our 13th pick ha ha!
I'd rather it be our #17.
Originally posted by WINiner:Originally posted by BigDaddy:Originally posted by frankie:Originally posted by KRS-1:Originally posted by krizay:Originally posted by DaFaro49ers:Originally posted by BenQ:
we can't trade the 17th pick, we'd have to trade our 13th
Just because he is tendered for a first round pick doesnt necessarily mean that the team who accepts a trade has to recieve a first rounder.
For example, he is tendered at a 1st round level, but the Ravens own Gaither's rights right now, and can trade him for anything.
Remember when we had Brandon Lloyd tendered at a 1st round level, and the Redskins had no first round picks. We traded Brandon Lloyed away for a 3rd and 4th rounder because we owned his rights.
So technically, the 49ers can give up the 17th pick for Gaither.
You are correct. But if we actually sign him to an offer sheet and they refuse it will be our #13.
Which tells me it will either be #13 or nothing. I don't see Balt intentionally trading him for a mid teen pick just to try and draft another guy to play LT. Wouldn't make any sense.
But if we make an offer they can't match. Then they have no choice but to take the #13 and hope for the best.
If Gaither leaves, Oher moves to LT
i would like this trade for our 13th pick! he is a proven player ha ha i sound like a briken record im sure! didnt even read the rest of the thread ha ha! baltimore gets boldin and gives us gaither, sounds like a fair trade for our 13th pick ha ha!
I'd rather it be our #17.
Can't trade a pick that wasn't originally yours. For instance, if Seattle wants Marshall, and Denver sticks to their guns about his tender, it's going to be for the 6th or no 1st rounder this year. You can only trade your own earned picks.
Originally posted by BigDaddy:Originally posted by WINiner:Originally posted by BigDaddy:Originally posted by frankie:Originally posted by KRS-1:Originally posted by krizay:Originally posted by DaFaro49ers:Originally posted by BenQ:
we can't trade the 17th pick, we'd have to trade our 13th
Just because he is tendered for a first round pick doesnt necessarily mean that the team who accepts a trade has to recieve a first rounder.
For example, he is tendered at a 1st round level, but the Ravens own Gaither's rights right now, and can trade him for anything.
Remember when we had Brandon Lloyd tendered at a 1st round level, and the Redskins had no first round picks. We traded Brandon Lloyed away for a 3rd and 4th rounder because we owned his rights.
So technically, the 49ers can give up the 17th pick for Gaither.
You are correct. But if we actually sign him to an offer sheet and they refuse it will be our #13.
Which tells me it will either be #13 or nothing. I don't see Balt intentionally trading him for a mid teen pick just to try and draft another guy to play LT. Wouldn't make any sense.
But if we make an offer they can't match. Then they have no choice but to take the #13 and hope for the best.
If Gaither leaves, Oher moves to LT
i would like this trade for our 13th pick! he is a proven player ha ha i sound like a briken record im sure! didnt even read the rest of the thread ha ha! baltimore gets boldin and gives us gaither, sounds like a fair trade for our 13th pick ha ha!
I'd rather it be our #17.
Can't trade a pick that wasn't originally yours. For instance, if Seattle wants Marshall, and Denver sticks to their guns about his tender, it's going to be for the 6th or no 1st rounder this year. You can only trade your own earned picks.
I know. Wishfull thinking. but we would be getting a proven player vs a unknown, just hate seeing that #13 go bye-bye.
Originally posted by KRS-1:Originally posted by krizay:Originally posted by DaFaro49ers:Originally posted by BenQ:
we can't trade the 17th pick, we'd have to trade our 13th
Just because he is tendered for a first round pick doesnt necessarily mean that the team who accepts a trade has to recieve a first rounder.
For example, he is tendered at a 1st round level, but the Ravens own Gaither's rights right now, and can trade him for anything.
Remember when we had Brandon Lloyd tendered at a 1st round level, and the Redskins had no first round picks. We traded Brandon Lloyed away for a 3rd and 4th rounder because we owned his rights.
So technically, the 49ers can give up the 17th pick for Gaither.
You are correct. But if we actually sign him to an offer sheet and they refuse it will be our #13.
Which tells me it will either be #13 or nothing. I don't see Balt intentionally trading him for a mid teen pick just to try and draft another guy to play LT. Wouldn't make any sense.
But if we make an offer they can't match. Then they have no choice but to take the #13 and hope for the best.
If Gaither leaves, Oher moves to LT
Originally posted by WINiner:Originally posted by BigDaddy:Originally posted by frankie:Originally posted by KRS-1:Originally posted by krizay:Originally posted by DaFaro49ers:Originally posted by BenQ:
we can't trade the 17th pick, we'd have to trade our 13th
Just because he is tendered for a first round pick doesnt necessarily mean that the team who accepts a trade has to recieve a first rounder.
For example, he is tendered at a 1st round level, but the Ravens own Gaither's rights right now, and can trade him for anything.
Remember when we had Brandon Lloyd tendered at a 1st round level, and the Redskins had no first round picks. We traded Brandon Lloyed away for a 3rd and 4th rounder because we owned his rights.
So technically, the 49ers can give up the 17th pick for Gaither.
You are correct. But if we actually sign him to an offer sheet and they refuse it will be our #13.
Which tells me it will either be #13 or nothing. I don't see Balt intentionally trading him for a mid teen pick just to try and draft another guy to play LT. Wouldn't make any sense.
But if we make an offer they can't match. Then they have no choice but to take the #13 and hope for the best.
If Gaither leaves, Oher moves to LT
i would like this trade for our 13th pick! he is a proven player ha ha i sound like a briken record im sure! didnt even read the rest of the thread ha ha! baltimore gets boldin and gives us gaither, sounds like a fair trade for our 13th pick ha ha!
I'd rather it be our #17.
Can't trade a pick that wasn't originally yours. For instance, if Seattle wants Marshall, and Denver sticks to their guns about his tender, it's going to be for the 6th or no 1st rounder this year. You can only trade your own earned picks.
Originally posted by krizay:Originally posted by WINiner:Originally posted by BigDaddy:Originally posted by frankie:Originally posted by KRS-1:Originally posted by krizay:Originally posted by DaFaro49ers:Originally posted by BenQ:
we can't trade the 17th pick, we'd have to trade our 13th
Just because he is tendered for a first round pick doesnt necessarily mean that the team who accepts a trade has to recieve a first rounder.
For example, he is tendered at a 1st round level, but the Ravens own Gaither's rights right now, and can trade him for anything.
Remember when we had Brandon Lloyd tendered at a 1st round level, and the Redskins had no first round picks. We traded Brandon Lloyed away for a 3rd and 4th rounder because we owned his rights.
So technically, the 49ers can give up the 17th pick for Gaither.
You are correct. But if we actually sign him to an offer sheet and they refuse it will be our #13.
Which tells me it will either be #13 or nothing. I don't see Balt intentionally trading him for a mid teen pick just to try and draft another guy to play LT. Wouldn't make any sense.
But if we make an offer they can't match. Then they have no choice but to take the #13 and hope for the best.
If Gaither leaves, Oher moves to LT
i would like this trade for our 13th pick! he is a proven player ha ha i sound like a briken record im sure! didnt even read the rest of the thread ha ha! baltimore gets boldin and gives us gaither, sounds like a fair trade for our 13th pick ha ha!
I'd rather it be our #17.
Can't trade a pick that wasn't originally yours. For instance, if Seattle wants Marshall, and Denver sticks to their guns about his tender, it's going to be for the 6th or no 1st rounder this year. You can only trade your own earned picks.
That's not true. You can TRADE any pick. But if an offer sheet is signed and compensation is to be awarded. It HAS to be your pick. But you can trade any pick you have if deal is reached. It just has to actually be a trade and not compensation for the actual tender.