There are 695 users in the forums
Willie Colon, RT
- 1 2
Jan 5, 2010 at 6:57 PM
- pantstickle
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 3,467
I don't know, will he?
The above videos are auto-populated by an affiliate.
Jan 5, 2010 at 6:59 PM
- PA9erFaithful
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,458
Every time I hear his name I think of this...
Jan 5, 2010 at 7:01 PM
- WheresWaldo
- Member
- Posts: 2,440
Originally posted by PA9erFaithful:Originally posted by WheresWaldo:Originally posted by PA9erFaithful:Originally posted by WheresWaldo:
He'd be perfect for our team! A good run blocker, but terrible in pass protection! YIPPY!
Do you know anything about football or do you just bulls**t for your own entertainment?
Hi, I'm Earth. Have we met?
Watchutalkinbout????
Just read between the lines.
Jan 6, 2010 at 5:07 AM
- Niners99
- Veteran
- Posts: 44,235
Originally posted by krizay:Originally posted by strickac:Originally posted by krizay:Originally posted by MadMartz:
Pitts Line played like crap this year. Ben was harrased as much as any qb in football. Colon was a big part of that!
Our line sucked too, so does that mean Staley is sucks?
It is possible to have to good lineman play on crappy lines.
you're right and after checking football focus I appeared to be wrong.
With that said. I'm not 100% sold on Staley at LT.
well the 49ers are sold on him at one of the T spots. he got a longterm deal, hes going to be starting for a while.
also, big fail to those who lumped Colon in with the Steelers bad OL this year. hes been outstanding. a pro bowl caliber player.
Jan 6, 2010 at 5:00 PM
- WheresWaldo
- Member
- Posts: 2,440
Originally posted by strickac:Originally posted by krizay:Originally posted by MadMartz:
Pitts Line played like crap this year. Ben was harrased as much as any qb in football. Colon was a big part of that!
Our line sucked too, so does that mean Staley sucks?
It is possible to have to good lineman play on crappy lines.
Staley's nothing to cream your pants about. He's.......alright.
Jan 7, 2010 at 7:13 AM
- lamontb
- Veteran
- Posts: 33,122
This guy isn't that good I've watched him alot. And in 2008/2009 season I think he played worse than Synder.
Jan 7, 2010 at 7:14 AM
- PA9erFaithful
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,458
Originally posted by WheresWaldo:Originally posted by strickac:Originally posted by krizay:Originally posted by MadMartz:
Pitts Line played like crap this year. Ben was harrased as much as any qb in football. Colon was a big part of that!
Our line sucked too, so does that mean Staley sucks?
It is possible to have to good lineman play on crappy lines.
Staley's nothing to cream your pants about. He's.......alright.
So you cream your pants about offensive linemen?? interesting.
Jan 7, 2010 at 11:40 AM
- WheresWaldo
- Member
- Posts: 2,440
Originally posted by PA9erFaithful:Originally posted by WheresWaldo:Originally posted by strickac:Originally posted by krizay:Originally posted by MadMartz:
Pitts Line played like crap this year. Ben was harrased as much as any qb in football. Colon was a big part of that!
Our line sucked too, so does that mean Staley sucks?
It is possible to have to good lineman play on crappy lines.
Staley's nothing to cream your pants about. He's.......alright.
So you cream your pants about offensive linemen?? interesting.
Oh yeah baby. All day. By the way, I have $12!!!!!
[ Edited by WheresWaldo on Jan 7, 2010 at 11:41:38 ]
Jan 25, 2010 at 5:51 AM
- WINiner
- Veteran
- Posts: 15,897
Originally posted by PA9erFaithful:
He'll be an RFA because of the lack of a new CBA, and we won't go after him if it requires giving up either a second or first round draft pick, which is what the Steelers will likely tender their starting RT.
Why not spend a 2nd though? I mean we are likely to draft and pay a shiz load of money to an unproven rookie lineman. I would rather pay a 2nd to the Steelers for a proven guy then take the chance on a rookie.
Jan 25, 2010 at 3:22 PM
- Overkill
- Moderator
- Posts: 11,759
Originally posted by WINiner:Originally posted by PA9erFaithful:
He'll be an RFA because of the lack of a new CBA, and we won't go after him if it requires giving up either a second or first round draft pick, which is what the Steelers will likely tender their starting RT.
Why not spend a 2nd though? I mean we are likely to draft and pay a shiz load of money to an unproven rookie lineman. I would rather pay a 2nd to the Steelers for a proven guy then take the chance on a rookie.
I agree with you in theory, but there is absolutely no way the Steelers let the best young piece of a bad OL go for a 2nd round selection imo.
They gave him the 1st round tender last year and this year they could have an additional franchise tag (depending on what happens with the CBA).
Jan 25, 2010 at 6:13 PM
- waiting4number6
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,223
No.
Jan 26, 2010 at 4:16 AM
- WINiner
- Veteran
- Posts: 15,897
Originally posted by Overkill:Originally posted by WINiner:Originally posted by PA9erFaithful:
He'll be an RFA because of the lack of a new CBA, and we won't go after him if it requires giving up either a second or first round draft pick, which is what the Steelers will likely tender their starting RT.
Why not spend a 2nd though? I mean we are likely to draft and pay a shiz load of money to an unproven rookie lineman. I would rather pay a 2nd to the Steelers for a proven guy then take the chance on a rookie.
I agree with you in theory, but there is absolutely no way the Steelers let the best young piece of a bad OL go for a 2nd round selection imo.
They gave him the 1st round tender last year and this year they could have an additional franchise tag (depending on what happens with the CBA).
After doing a bit more research on Colon I wouldn't want to spend a 2nd on him anyway. He allows much too much pressure and is deficient in the passing game. Let Pitt overpay the guy, and hopefully McC stays away.....
- 1 2