There are 284 users in the forums
NewEraNiner's 3/2/11 Mock Draft
Mar 2, 2011 at 2:20 PM
- NinerBuff
- The Election Dude
- Posts: 21,443
Miller and Ponder would be a successful draft. We would still go after a CB and QB in FA, we would have addressed our needs.
Mar 2, 2011 at 2:29 PM
- CoachingMatters
- Member
- Posts: 364
I think there is to much value in those 4th rd picks to grab a guy who wont play for a year or 2. I`d stay put or even trade back before I would give up thos 2 4th rounders to grab a project QB.
Mar 2, 2011 at 2:42 PM
- 9erguy
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,353
Would love this draft, being a Texas A&M grad as well as a staunch supporter of Ponder. Although without a new CBA, we will see no trades on draft day.
Mar 2, 2011 at 3:08 PM
- tohara3
- Veteran
- Posts: 30,683
Nice draft
Mar 2, 2011 at 3:15 PM
- NinerBuff
- The Election Dude
- Posts: 21,443
Originally posted by CoachingMatters:
I think there is to much value in those 4th rd picks to grab a guy who wont play for a year or 2. I`d stay put or even trade back before I would give up thos 2 4th rounders to grab a project QB.
We need QB help now, and with no options for a starting QB, we should be actively seeking a starting QB through the draft. In my estimation, only three QBs in the draft could legitimately start within the first year: Gabbert, Locker, and Ponder. Every other QB seems to be a "project" (maybe Dalton too).
Mar 2, 2011 at 3:21 PM
- NewEraNiner
- Veteran
- Posts: 577
Originally posted by 9erguy:
Would love this draft, being a Texas A&M grad as well as a staunch supporter of Ponder. Although without a new CBA, we will see no trades on draft day.
Thanks 9erguy.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think without a CBA there just won't be any trades involving players on draft day. Trades of picks (especially during the same draft) should be OK.
Mar 2, 2011 at 3:22 PM
- nvninerfan1
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,601
The rich get richer, and the poor get poorer
Mar 2, 2011 at 3:28 PM
- NewEraNiner
- Veteran
- Posts: 577
Originally posted by NinerBuff:
Miller and Ponder would be a successful draft. We would still go after a CB and QB in FA, we would have addressed our needs.
Yeah I would still like to get an experienced West Coast QB (Palmer, etc.) for Ponder to learn from at least initially.
Mar 2, 2011 at 3:39 PM
- CoachingMatters
- Member
- Posts: 364
Originally posted by NinerBuff:Originally posted by CoachingMatters:
I think there is to much value in those 4th rd picks to grab a guy who wont play for a year or 2. I`d stay put or even trade back before I would give up thos 2 4th rounders to grab a project QB.
We need QB help now, and with no options for a starting QB, we should be actively seeking a starting QB through the draft. In my estimation, only three QBs in the draft could legitimately start within the first year: Gabbert, Locker, and Ponder. Every other QB seems to be a "project" (maybe Dalton too).
We definately do, But If he doesnt start he isnt worth the pick IMHO. And I dont think he will start. Im pretty sure Coach has his eyes on a few late rd QBs who he feels he can develope. And for that reason I dont believe we will reach on a QB. Id rather stay put in the 2nd and draft 2 qbs in the 4th rd.
Mar 2, 2011 at 5:11 PM
- ishkabibel
- Veteran
- Posts: 696
Draft fulfills major needs. I'd prefer not to give up 2 4's but think it's realistic.
Mar 2, 2011 at 7:16 PM
- communist
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,475
nice draft in general but i dont like the trade in particular...i'm not so high on ponder like u. and i do believe that we can get a qb with the same quality at our origin 2nd-round spot.
ponder had a nice senior bowl and a good combine respectively...but his season was avg and i dont forget that.
ponder had a nice senior bowl and a good combine respectively...but his season was avg and i dont forget that.
[ Edited by communist on Mar 2, 2011 at 7:18 PM ]
Mar 2, 2011 at 10:43 PM
- elguapo
- Veteran
- Posts: 26,399
I think ariz grabs miller not quinn but if they go qb then we will get miller. Ponder we may have to move up but not to 33 maybe a few spots and lose one fourth not two.