Would Brady pass Montana in your mind??? | Page 3

bigmur49 · 2010-09-07T05:08:50-07:00

Let's just say in some weird fantasy world that this summer Tom Brady becomes a free agent, signs with the Niners, and over the next 4 or 5 years wins another 2 Superbowls to end his career with SF. With 5 Rings, 2 with us, would you call Brady the best ever???? I know it's ridiculous and all but we only have 5 days left and I have read every post in here 10 times looking for 1 tiny bit of new Niner info!

Sep 7, 2010 at 8:59 AM

#31

DaveWilcox
Veteran
Posts: 3,717

Joe knows Super Bowls!!!!!!!!!!!

Sep 7, 2010 at 9:00 AM

#32

Afrikan
Veteran
Posts: 23,468

bunch of Blind homers here, I swear.

imo, yes Montana is the greatest for what Joe has done as a player.....but to downplay what Brady has done in his career like some are doing in this thread, is just nonsense.

Sep 7, 2010 at 9:04 AM

#33

elguapo
Veteran
Posts: 26,383

Originally posted by oldman9er:
Not a chance... Tom Brady was developed with remarkable advantages from Belichick's foul, cheating ways. How hard is it for a QB to have success when he knows what a defense is gonna do? He gets no love from me, as he didn't have to endure the same development as quarterbacks do.

so true and montana won 2 sb's with no great wr, and 81 he won it with little to no help on offense. Sick! Brady not only choked, he choked WITH MOSS AND WELKER. That never happened with montana, and brady only could put them in position to kick a game winning FG whereas Montana just tore D's apart.

Sep 7, 2010 at 9:05 AM

#34

Swankypro
Veteran
Posts: 50

Brady= Great
Montana= God

Sep 7, 2010 at 9:09 AM

#35

Redeemer
Veteran
Posts: 731

Originally posted by SnakePlissken:
Originally posted by kingairta:
Nope because of the cheating, the "tuck" and Adam Vs foot.

Sep 7, 2010 at 9:10 AM

#36

OKC49erFan
Veteran
Posts: 7,416

Originally posted by Afrikan:
bunch of Blind homers here, I swear.

imo, yes Montana is the greatest for what Joe has done as a player.....but to downplay what Brady has done in his career like some are doing in this thread, is just nonsense.

I disagree. I think it is important to look at the game as it is, compared to how it was. That is pretty important when comparing players from different eras. Brady is the best of today, but he doesn't touch Montana.

Sep 7, 2010 at 9:10 AM

#37

Shemp
Hall of Fame
Posts: 29,755

Originally posted by oldman9er:
Not a chance... Tom Brady was developed with remarkable advantages from Belichick's foul, cheating ways. How hard is it for a QB to have success when he knows what a defense is gonna do? He gets no love from me, as he didn't have to endure the same development as quarterbacks do.

Brady's fans would say that Montana benefitted from no salary cap and Eddie D's spending sprees.

Regardless, Joe won all his superbowls and threw NO INT's. Brady has not won all his superbowls, and I'm pretty sure (but haven't checked) that he's thrown at least 1 INT, someone else can verify. Montana was/is better.

Sep 7, 2010 at 9:12 AM

#38

Sjceruti
Veteran
Posts: 1,528

Joe never lost a superbowl

/thread

Sep 7, 2010 at 9:13 AM

#39

djfullshred
Veteran
Posts: 9,838

Meh.

Walsh & Montana could win without cheating by stealing the other team's defensive playcalls.

Sep 7, 2010 at 9:15 AM

#40

OKC49erFan
Veteran
Posts: 7,416

Originally posted by Shaj:
Originally posted by oldman9er:
Not a chance... Tom Brady was developed with remarkable advantages from Belichick's foul, cheating ways. How hard is it for a QB to have success when he knows what a defense is gonna do? He gets no love from me, as he didn't have to endure the same development as quarterbacks do.

Brady's fans would say that Montana benefitted from no salary cap and Eddie D's spending sprees.

Regardless, Joe won all his superbowls and threw NO INT's. Brady has not won all his superbowls, and I'm pretty sure (but haven't checked) that he's thrown at least 1 INT, someone else can verify. Montana was/is better.

Other teams also didnt have the salary cap. Also, there aren't any real dynastic teams today like there were back then.

Sep 7, 2010 at 9:23 AM

#41

Shemp
Hall of Fame
Posts: 29,755

Originally posted by OKC49erFan:
Originally posted by Shaj:
Originally posted by oldman9er:
Not a chance... Tom Brady was developed with remarkable advantages from Belichick's foul, cheating ways. How hard is it for a QB to have success when he knows what a defense is gonna do? He gets no love from me, as he didn't have to endure the same development as quarterbacks do.

Brady's fans would say that Montana benefitted from no salary cap and Eddie D's spending sprees.

Regardless, Joe won all his superbowls and threw NO INT's. Brady has not won all his superbowls, and I'm pretty sure (but haven't checked) that he's thrown at least 1 INT, someone else can verify. Montana was/is better.

Other teams also didnt have the salary cap. Also, there aren't any real dynastic teams today like there were back then.

I didn't say I agree with them; I don't. I also don't agree with our own Alexcuses. I'm just saying what excuses they would come up with. All fan bases have their team and player specific excuses, right?

Sep 7, 2010 at 9:39 AM

#42

OKC49erFan
Veteran
Posts: 7,416

Originally posted by Shaj:
Originally posted by OKC49erFan:
Originally posted by Shaj:
Originally posted by oldman9er:
Not a chance... Tom Brady was developed with remarkable advantages from Belichick's foul, cheating ways. How hard is it for a QB to have success when he knows what a defense is gonna do? He gets no love from me, as he didn't have to endure the same development as quarterbacks do.

Brady's fans would say that Montana benefitted from no salary cap and Eddie D's spending sprees.

Regardless, Joe won all his superbowls and threw NO INT's. Brady has not won all his superbowls, and I'm pretty sure (but haven't checked) that he's thrown at least 1 INT, someone else can verify. Montana was/is better.

Other teams also didnt have the salary cap. Also, there aren't any real dynastic teams today like there were back then.

I didn't say I agree with them; I don't. I also don't agree with our own Alexcuses. I'm just saying what excuses they would come up with. All fan bases have their team and player specific excuses, right?

For f#ck's sake Shaj, you used to be capable of discussing different topics. Now all you have are gold diggers, alexcuses, and pooping in public restrooms.

Sep 7, 2010 at 9:43 AM

#43

Shemp
Hall of Fame
Posts: 29,755

Originally posted by OKC49erFan:
Originally posted by Shaj:
Originally posted by OKC49erFan:
Originally posted by Shaj:
Originally posted by oldman9er:
Not a chance... Tom Brady was developed with remarkable advantages from Belichick's foul, cheating ways. How hard is it for a QB to have success when he knows what a defense is gonna do? He gets no love from me, as he didn't have to endure the same development as quarterbacks do.

Brady's fans would say that Montana benefitted from no salary cap and Eddie D's spending sprees.

Regardless, Joe won all his superbowls and threw NO INT's. Brady has not won all his superbowls, and I'm pretty sure (but haven't checked) that he's thrown at least 1 INT, someone else can verify. Montana was/is better.

Other teams also didnt have the salary cap. Also, there aren't any real dynastic teams today like there were back then.

I didn't say I agree with them; I don't. I also don't agree with our own Alexcuses. I'm just saying what excuses they would come up with. All fan bases have their team and player specific excuses, right?

For f#ck's sake Shaj, you used to be capable of discussing different topics. Now all you have are gold diggers, alexcuses, and pooping in public restrooms.

I'm trying to keep my life simple these days. I can't be an expert in everything!

Sep 7, 2010 at 9:46 AM

#44

jays9ers
Veteran
Posts: 4,541

Brady is a great HOF qb. But I just think overall Montana was the better player.. Just my opinion.

Sep 7, 2010 at 9:47 AM

#45

jimrat
Veteran
Posts: 23,964

People shouldn't comment unless they seen Joe play. I heard someone say Ed Reed was better then Ronnie Lott a while back and I asked him if he seen Ronnie Lott play and he said no only in highlights...............dude was 21 years old. :)