Could we use Nate Davis like the Eagles use Mike Vick?
Thoughts/comments???
There are 327 users in the forums
Could we use Nate Davis...
Dec 18, 2009 at 8:09 AM
- D_Niner
- Veteran
- Posts: 8,501
Dec 18, 2009 at 8:11 AM
- valrod33
- Hall of Small
- Posts: 138,090
- NFL Pick 'em
stupid idea, they are not similar whatsoever
Dec 18, 2009 at 8:15 AM
- jreff22
- Veteran
- Posts: 67,259
Nate Davis 5.00 40
Michael Vick 4.36 40
Michael Vick 4.36 40
Dec 18, 2009 at 8:22 AM
- LumpiaJeff
- Veteran
- Posts: 51,506
Dec 18, 2009 at 8:30 AM
- taney71
- Veteran
- Posts: 17,763
Why are there people on this board who think Nate Davis is the second coming of Vick, Joe Montana, Deon Sanders, [insert famous football player's name here]....?
Davis was a late round pick who is a project QB. He's not going to see the field this year and most likely will not next year.
Davis was a late round pick who is a project QB. He's not going to see the field this year and most likely will not next year.
Dec 18, 2009 at 8:37 AM
- prime21
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,062
Originally posted by jreff22:
Nate Davis 5.00 40
Michael Vick 4.36 40
if you want to compare m.vick to v.davis you are freken crazy
Dec 18, 2009 at 8:37 AM
- D_Niner
- Veteran
- Posts: 8,501
Originally posted by taney71:
Why are there people on this board who think Nate Davis is the second coming of Vick, Joe Montana, Deon Sanders, [insert famous football player's name here]....?
Davis was a late round pick who is a project QB. He's not going to see the field this year and most likely will not next year.
Who ever said that. It's just a question.
Why are there people on this board that always jump to conclusions when somebody asks a question.
Dec 18, 2009 at 8:39 AM
- D_Niner
- Veteran
- Posts: 8,501
Originally posted by NinerGM:Originally posted by D_Niner:
Could we use Nate Davis like the Eagles use Mike Vick?
Thoughts/comments???
I don't know much about this kid so I asked a question. I don't watch college ball, so I figured some folks on here could help answer this.
Dec 18, 2009 at 8:40 AM
- D_Niner
- Veteran
- Posts: 8,501
Originally posted by jreff22:
Nate Davis 5.00 40
Michael Vick 4.36 40
Wow!
Thanks Jeff,
I didn't know Nate was that slow. I thought I remember him making a couple of good runs in the Pre-season.
I don't have time to watch any college ball, so this kind of input really helps!
Dec 18, 2009 at 8:42 AM
- jreff22
- Veteran
- Posts: 67,259
Originally posted by D_Niner:Originally posted by jreff22:
Nate Davis 5.00 40
Michael Vick 4.36 40
Wow!
Thanks Jeff,
I didn't know Nate was that slow. I thought I remember him making a couple of good runs in the Pre-season.
I don't have time to watch any college ball, so this kind of input really helps!
Who is this Jeff you speak of?
Dec 18, 2009 at 8:42 AM
- Schulzy
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,372
racist mofo
Dec 18, 2009 at 8:43 AM
- jreff22
- Veteran
- Posts: 67,259
Originally posted by prime21:He was comparing Vick to Nate DavisOriginally posted by jreff22:
Nate Davis 5.00 40
Michael Vick 4.36 40
if you want to compare m.vick to v.davis you are freken crazy
Dec 18, 2009 at 8:43 AM
- 9erfanAUS
- Veteran
- Posts: 16,281
So you want two QBs on the field at once? What for, so they can pass the ball to each other?
-9fA
-9fA
Dec 18, 2009 at 8:44 AM
- D_Niner
- Veteran
- Posts: 8,501
Originally posted by valrod33:
stupid idea, they are not similar whatsoever
Idea??? WTF. I ask the question because I don't know much about this kid. If you want to say its a stupid question, then that's fine. But, please don't infer that I'm suggesting we do use Nate this way.
Dec 18, 2009 at 8:48 AM
- D_Niner
- Veteran
- Posts: 8,501
Originally posted by 9erfanAUS:
So you want two QBs on the field at once? What for, so they can pass the ball to each other?
-9fA
Kinda like why we would only want 1 reciver or 1 RB on the field at once, right?
2 QB, can cause confusion and give us an advantage if we have the right personnel and it's used right. I'm just asking if Nate could give us this type of play cause I don't know much about the kid...