Punk's rise as a top star.. the return of some huge names, a much better tag team division etc.. leaves me hope
[ Edited by Paul on Nov 23, 2012 at 11:49:06 ]
There are 434 users in the forums
Originally posted by ads_2006:
Originally posted by fropwns:
Originally posted by btthepunk:
Despite that report, I still fully expect Rock to win the title at Royal Rumble.
Here is my thing, why do you bring in the Rock to job for Punk? Now, does Rocky need the belt, no. But, really, you let him job to Punk? Why? Where is the logic in that? And who gives a s**t if he isn't on TV every week or the pay per views? Overall, who is going to be the bigger draw/ratings bump as the champ, Punk or the Rock? This isn't rocket science. Who would put more asses in the seats at WM, Punk or Rock? Especially, in the main event? The fans would go ape s**t over a Rock victory. To be sure, the internet wrestling community loves them some CM Punk (I met the guy at WM 25, he is a royal a*****e; in fact, I wasn't the only one that thought so, either), but the larger wrestling fan base loves the Rock.
lets say rock wins the title...
he jobs to cena at wm? cena is already established, losing to rock didn't even make a difference to cena.
WM or any show for that matter is already going to be a big draw regardless of whether rock is champ or not
Originally posted by tjd808185:
Originally posted by ads_2006:
lets say rock wins the title...
he jobs to cena at wm? cena is already established, losing to rock didn't even make a difference to cena.
WM or any show for that matter is already going to be a big draw regardless of whether rock is champ or not
It's going to be big no matter what but how big is determined by how interested people are. It doesn't make much sense to bring in Rock and Lesnar in and then waste them on mid card rematches. You're just not going to generate interest by selling a product people have already seen with no twist to it at all. Rock Cena 2 for the belt is at least telling people the stakes have been raised. Not that I'm for Rock Cena 2.
To me I think it should be obvious. The second Brock Lesnar was brought in it's Brock v streak. Rock's championship run has been teased since the day after Mania. Why you would want to go against that is beyond me.
Originally posted by zillabeast:
modded (profanity in title)
Originally posted by btthepunk:
Originally posted by zillabeast:
modded (profanity in title)
Originally posted by FL9er:
Does Matt Morgan still wrestle for TNA?
Saw him at the gym on Saturday. Huge. Wife/Girlfriend? Hideous.
Originally posted by Paul:
I actually think Wrestling is fairly decent now.. it will never be perfect, but I like it for what it is. Sure the writing is somewhat inconsistent but since 2010 when Nexus stormed Raw and messed it all up, I think it's been on the upswing. Wrestling is just not that popular anymore and UFC has risen up quite a bit... I do not know if there will again be a huge boom like we saw in the 90s, but I am optimistic & appreciate what we have as a fan.
Punk's rise as a top star.. the return of some huge names, a much better tag team division etc.. leaves me hope
Originally posted by zillabeast:
Anything good heppen on RAW?
Originally posted by 228niner:
Originally posted by zillabeast:
Anything good heppen on RAW?
Michael Cole interviewed the 3 "outsiders" Romans, Ambrose and Rollins... They now call themself the shield, Ryback has a TLC match with Punk @ the TLC ppv, and we had a few good matches with mysterio vs daniel bryan, ziggler vs cena, and shameus vs antonio ceasaro