Kings are the only ones that really make sense.
I wonder when we'll see expansion again. I think this is the longest there's ever been without it. (not sure though)
There are 299 users in the forums
2012 NBA Offseason Thread
Sep 25, 2012 at 8:46 PM
- LA9erFan
- Veteran
- Posts: 66,021
Sep 25, 2012 at 8:48 PM
- StOnEy333
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 99,663
Originally posted by crzy:So which team is moving to Seattle?
I'd bet it being the Kings.
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nba-ball-dont-lie/seattle-city-council-votes-favor-arena-deal-004902074--nba.html
The irony. Seattle steals a team after theirs was stolen from them. lol
If they can't call them the Supersonics, then don't even bother.
Sep 25, 2012 at 8:52 PM
- LA9erFan
- Veteran
- Posts: 66,021
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
The irony. Seattle steals a team after theirs was stolen from them. lol
If they can't call them the Supersonics, then don't even bother.
Meh. Sacramento stole the Kings from Kansas City in '86, and probably didn't deserve an NBA team in the first place.
Sep 25, 2012 at 8:53 PM
- crzy
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 40,285
The city of Seattle kept the rights to the Sonics and everything, so yes they would be called that.
And I don't see anything wrong with Seattle taking the Kings from Sacramento.
Then the Warriors could have all of Northern California to themselves
And I don't see anything wrong with Seattle taking the Kings from Sacramento.
Then the Warriors could have all of Northern California to themselves
Sep 25, 2012 at 9:24 PM
- StOnEy333
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 99,663
Originally posted by crzy:The city of Seattle kept the rights to the Sonics and everything, so yes they would be called that.
And I don't see anything wrong with Seattle taking the Kings from Sacramento.
Then the Warriors could have all of Northern California to themselves
Oh man, I just read up on the sonics name deal. What a mess. The owner gave up the name and colors and all that, but he kept the history attached to OKC. But if a new team expands in Seattle, they can have the history as well, but OKC wouldn't necessarily give up the history, too. If a team moves to seattle, they would associate with the history of the moving team, therefore they would not acquire the sonics/okc history.
Sep 25, 2012 at 9:25 PM
- jrg
- Veteran
- Posts: 166,549
Bring a team to St. Louis already!
Sep 25, 2012 at 9:27 PM
- pdizo916
- Member
- Posts: 38,241
Originally posted by jrg:
Bring a team to St. Louis already!
you can have the warriors.
Sep 26, 2012 at 12:23 AM
- crzy
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 40,285
Originally posted by niners4lyfe:
Originally posted by jrg:
Bring a team to St. Louis already!
you can have the warriors.
f**k that.
St Louis doesn't deserve an NBA team
St Louis already had an NBA team and blew it
[ Edited by crzy on Sep 26, 2012 at 12:23 AM ]
Sep 26, 2012 at 1:02 AM
- StOnEy333
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 99,663
Originally posted by crzy:Originally posted by niners4lyfe:Originally posted by jrg:Bring a team to St. Louis already!
you can have the warriors.
f**k that.
St Louis doesn't deserve an NBA team
St Louis already had an NBA team and blew it
By that logic, Seattle doesn't deserve one either.
Sep 26, 2012 at 1:06 AM
- YungAce
- Veteran
- Posts: 46,915
Originally posted by niners4lyfe:Originally posted by jrg:Bring a team to St. Louis already!
you can have the warriors.
You a Dubs or Kings fan?!
Sep 26, 2012 at 2:04 AM
- marshulk
- Veteran
- Posts: 45,242
Go kings
f**k Seattle
f**k Seattle
Sep 26, 2012 at 5:25 AM
- jrg
- Veteran
- Posts: 166,549
Originally posted by StOnEy333:Originally posted by crzy:Originally posted by niners4lyfe:Originally posted by jrg:Bring a team to St. Louis already!
you can have the warriors.
f**k that.
St Louis doesn't deserve an NBA team
St Louis already had an NBA team and blew it
By that logic, Seattle doesn't deserve one either.
This. How can you support Seattle getting a team but say St. Louis blew it? Lol
Sep 26, 2012 at 5:28 AM
- jrg
- Veteran
- Posts: 166,549
Originally posted by niners4lyfe:Originally posted by jrg:Bring a team to St. Louis already!
you can have the warriors.
I'd take any team
Sep 26, 2012 at 8:06 AM
- crzy
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 40,285
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by crzy:
Originally posted by niners4lyfe:
Originally posted by jrg:
Bring a team to St. Louis already!
you can have the warriors.
f**k that.
St Louis doesn't deserve an NBA team
St Louis already had an NBA team and blew it
By that logic, Seattle doesn't deserve one either.
This. How can you support Seattle getting a team but say St. Louis blew it? Lol
Simple. Because I like the city of Seattle and dislike the city of St Louis.
Sep 26, 2012 at 8:10 AM
- StOnEy333
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 99,663
Originally posted by crzy:Originally posted by jrg:Originally posted by StOnEy333:Originally posted by crzy:Originally posted by niners4lyfe:Originally posted by jrg:Bring a team to St. Louis already!
you can have the warriors.
f**k that.
St Louis doesn't deserve an NBA team
St Louis already had an NBA team and blew it
By that logic, Seattle doesn't deserve one either.
This. How can you support Seattle getting a team but say St. Louis blew it? Lol
Simple. Because I like the city of Seattle and dislike the city of St Louis.
Ah. So you're a seahawks fan. I see.