There are 62 users in the forums

Remember
Not a member? Register Now!

Deron Williams traded to the Nets

  • TX9R
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 8,207
Originally posted by MadMoneyMarshall:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by crzy:
I actually wouldn't mind contraction, I just don't like the status quo. Contract 4 teams and redistribute their talent

What 4 teams?

Charlotte, Memphis, New Orleans, Toronto.

I think the kings have to be considered in any talk like this.

BUT SACRAMENTO HAS SUCH A GOOD FAN BASE

So do most teams when they're winning. What's the attendance like these days?
And I wouldn't move any teams to the midwest, it's a dying area all around. Whatever allegiences they have aren't going change with a recycled sports team.
  • crzy
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 39,284
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Originally posted by crzy:
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
I think options in Seattle and St. Louis should be explored before contraction is proposed. Especially St. Louis, as they have an arena that could support it.

Contract Charlotte Memphis,

Move the Hornets to Seattle, Move the Clippers back to San Diego. Move the Hawks back to St Louis. Move the Kings back to Kansas City.

That actually isn't a bad plan. But can't you at least move the Kings to Seattle, I could still root for them there.

Does it matter which team moves to Seattle, they'd be called the Sonics again
Originally posted by TX9R:
Originally posted by MadMoneyMarshall:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by crzy:
I actually wouldn't mind contraction, I just don't like the status quo. Contract 4 teams and redistribute their talent

What 4 teams?

Charlotte, Memphis, New Orleans, Toronto.

I think the kings have to be considered in any talk like this.

BUT SACRAMENTO HAS SUCH A GOOD FAN BASE

So do most teams when they're winning. What's the attendance like these days?
And I wouldn't move any teams to the midwest, it's a dying area all around. Whatever allegiences they have aren't going change with a recycled sports team.

Their attendance is actually still pretty good despite having a losing record the last couple years.
Originally posted by MadMoneyMarshall:
Originally posted by TX9R:
Originally posted by MadMoneyMarshall:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by crzy:
I actually wouldn't mind contraction, I just don't like the status quo. Contract 4 teams and redistribute their talent

What 4 teams?

Charlotte, Memphis, New Orleans, Toronto.

I think the kings have to be considered in any talk like this.

BUT SACRAMENTO HAS SUCH A GOOD FAN BASE

So do most teams when they're winning. What's the attendance like these days?
And I wouldn't move any teams to the midwest, it's a dying area all around. Whatever allegiences they have aren't going change with a recycled sports team.

Their attendance is actually still pretty good despite having a losing record the last couple years.

Okay I was wrong they are second to last. LOL
  • TX9R
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 8,207
Originally posted by MadMoneyMarshall:
Originally posted by TX9R:
Originally posted by MadMoneyMarshall:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by crzy:
I actually wouldn't mind contraction, I just don't like the status quo. Contract 4 teams and redistribute their talent

What 4 teams?

Charlotte, Memphis, New Orleans, Toronto.

I think the kings have to be considered in any talk like this.

BUT SACRAMENTO HAS SUCH A GOOD FAN BASE

So do most teams when they're winning. What's the attendance like these days?
And I wouldn't move any teams to the midwest, it's a dying area all around. Whatever allegiences they have aren't going change with a recycled sports team.

Their attendance is actually still pretty good despite having a losing record the last couple years.

out of 30 teams they rank currently...

29 Kings 29 13,494 77.9% capacity

But it is an improvement from 2009

30 Kings 40 12,571 72.6% capacity

yeah, pretty good
Originally posted by MadMoneyMarshall:
Originally posted by MadMoneyMarshall:
Originally posted by TX9R:
Originally posted by MadMoneyMarshall:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by crzy:
I actually wouldn't mind contraction, I just don't like the status quo. Contract 4 teams and redistribute their talent

What 4 teams?

Charlotte, Memphis, New Orleans, Toronto.

I think the kings have to be considered in any talk like this.

BUT SACRAMENTO HAS SUCH A GOOD FAN BASE

So do most teams when they're winning. What's the attendance like these days?
And I wouldn't move any teams to the midwest, it's a dying area all around. Whatever allegiences they have aren't going change with a recycled sports team.

Their attendance is actually still pretty good despite having a losing record the last couple years.

Okay I was wrong they are second to last. LOL

Yeah apparently you don't go to many games or even watch them on TV. Arco .. scratch that ... Power Balance Pavilion is dead.
Regardless, next year they will be NBA champs. WATCHOUT
Originally posted by MadMoneyMarshall:
Regardless, next year they will be NBA champs. WATCHOUT

GO Los Angeles Kings of Anaheim, go!
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Originally posted by MadMoneyMarshall:
Regardless, next year they will be NBA champs. WATCHOUT

GO Los Angeles Kings of Anaheim, go!

The Clippers are always pretty profitable. They're not getting moved or contracted.
  • crzy
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 39,284
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
The Clippers are always pretty profitable. They're not getting moved or contracted.

yeah but they should be moved
Originally posted by crzy:
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
The Clippers are always pretty profitable. They're not getting moved or contracted.

yeah but they should be moved

Why?
  • crzy
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 39,284
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
Originally posted by crzy:
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
The Clippers are always pretty profitable. They're not getting moved or contracted.

yeah but they should be moved

Why?

I don't think there should be two teams in the same city.
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
Originally posted by crzy:
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
The Clippers are always pretty profitable. They're not getting moved or contracted.

yeah but they should be moved

Why?

How many die hard Clips fans do you know?
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
Originally posted by crzy:
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
The Clippers are always pretty profitable. They're not getting moved or contracted.

yeah but they should be moved

Why?

How many die hard Clips fans do you know?