Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 828 users in the forums

Would you make this deal if you were the Giants GM?

Would you make this deal if you were the Giants GM?

Originally posted by Niners99:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:

I notice you totally ignored how you were completely wrong when you said that Villalona chose not to enter the draft. You also conveniently left out your error when you said he was the highest bonus player ever. Get your facts straight before you start spewing out BS. Harper is a MUCH more highly touted player. Period. He was the consensus #1 player in the draft. Villalona as I mentioned was never even considered the Giants top prospect.

Your idea of a pure hitter is laughable. All you are going by is someone who hits for a high average. Right.. Freddie Sanchez is more of a pure hitter than Albert Pujols because Albert is a run producer. I guess Manny Ramirez isnt a "pure hitter" because he hits for power. You just look more ridiculous every time you post with statements like this.


Before you said that you wouldnt trade Sanchez or Posey for Strasburg because they were proven (laughing so hard at that) and Strasburg isnt. Now you backpedal. Which is it. Also, you are just so naive if you dont think Sabean or any GM in baseball would deal Buster Posey for Stephen Strasburg, My god. You really dont know anything about baseball do you? I love the way you also try to suggest that I ever said anything about trading Lincecum for Harper. HELLO!!!!!!!!!

I'm really done debating with someone makes so many errors in his post, tries to switch things around, and doesnt get what the jist of the post was to begin with.

LOL dude you are the WORST person at understanding posts. wow. you have the reading comprehension of a 7 year old.

first of all, i am fully aware that international players dont enter the draft. my point was that the caliber of player Villalona was at the time, he WOULDVE been drafted very high. and i never said he was the highest paid bonus player ever. and you are wrong in saying he was never the Giants highest touted prospect. he has consistantly been ranked in their organizational top 3 by Baseball America since he was signed. Baseball America is the foremost authority on the analysis of farm systems and prospects in baseball.

Dec. 14th, 2007, Angel Villalona was in fact the number 1 ranked prospect in the Giants organization.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/rankings/organization-top-10-prospects/2008/265340.html

you call yourself a baseball fan, yet you have no idea what a pure hitter is? i JUST got done explaining to you what it was. its not just about hitting for a high average, and it doesnt dismiss players for having power. Do i have to explain it word for word? or do you just take everything literal and jump to conclusions...you can be a power hitter and be a pure hitter. the point is, Zimmerman is not. hes a solid run producing 3B with a gold glove. theres a reason hes a .280 hitter. his ability to hit the ball to all field consistently to get on base simply isnt as good as others.

i honestly cannot beleive youre arguing with me over this. do you watch baseball? do you follow it outside the Giants? you should know what a "pure hitter" is, and is not. instead, try to stop skimming posts and misjudging whats said, and then insulting me over it. btw its hard to make a good counter argument about my intelligence when you keep spelling players names wrong. "Freddie Sanchez", or even your beloved "Stephen Strasberg".

you read things wrong, and then insult people over it. easily confused i suppose. first off, i never said i wouldnt deal Sanchez for Strasburg. you made that up. second, i specifically said i WOULD deal Posey for Strasburg on a blank canvas, but that the Giants specific situation suggests that a future stud hitting C is more important than another SP. have you thought about contracts? Lincecum is due for a big one in a couple seasons. Cain wants money too. Strasburg is represented by Scott Boras. say he turns out to be the best pitcher in baseball, hes getting a deal the Giants cant afford.

it makes very little baseball sense for the Giants in their specific situation to deal Buster Posey for Stephen Strasburg. thats why i think they would not do it.

your arrogance does not match your knowledge. sorry. if you want to get all high and mighty about how right you are, do a better job at understanding what im saying, not what you THOUGHT i said. read over the posts more before you respond. you based my "laughable" knowledge of baseball on opinions you made up. "haha you think pujols and manny arent pure hitters because they hit for power??" um....no. try again. dont put words in my mouth because you have trouble understanding things.

Here you go... from your posts: LOL
1) "do you remember how we got Villalona? he was a 16 year old dominican phenom JUST like Harper. he had tremendous upside. we gave him several million just to sign. at the time it was a record. he didnt enter the draft because he was so coveted, he was going to just sign a multi million dollar signing bonus with clubs scouting him.

Of course now you say that you are "fully aware that he couldnt enter the draft" Yes I think you are... after I pointed it out to you. Otherwise, why would you have made this comment.

2) "do you know what a "pure hitter" is? its not a guy who hits 30 hr and drive in 100. thats a run producer"

Now you of course say that a pure hitter can be a power hitter. Hmmmm . SO which is it?

3)" the Giants have coveted young players such as Lincecum, Cain, Sandoval, Sanchez, and Posey. the jury is still out on Bumgarner. but the point is, those first 5 guys listed have tons of potential, have already proved they can hack it at the MAJOR league level, and are all young and have the best and brightest years ahead of them. dealing any of them for prospects who are NOT proven, would be stupid"

You include Sanchez and Posey on the list of "proven players" and it would be "stupid" in your words to trade them for an unproven player like Strasburg. Again, you say one thing in a post and now something different.

I only responded this time because of your insults and the fact that you question whether I even watch the game. I will refrain from any more back and forth insults and I suggest you do the same. If you want to continue this why dont you PM me.
  • boast
  • Hella Fame
  • Posts: 156,134
Originally posted by AXEGRINDER:
No.


Oh wait, make that Hell No.
I decided to pose this question to Jim Callis, executive editor from Baseball America. Here is the question that I asked him and his response:

Jim,
We have had some friendly debates among friends on which trio a MLB team would choose for the next decade. Would love to hear both your choices and how you think a poll of 30 GMS would go.

1) Strasburg, Harper, and Zimmerman versus Lincecum, Sandoval, and Posey

2) Josh Johnson, Hanley, and Stanton versus Lincecum, Sandoval, and Posey

Finally.. rank these 4 from 1-5 on who baseball GMS would take in your opinion:

Lincecum, Sandoval, Posey
Johnson,Hanley,Stanton
Strasburg,Harper,Zimmerman
Price,Longoria,Upton
Kershaw,Kemp,Ethier

Thanks as always!
John

Jim's response:
I'd take the Was and Fla trios because I'm not sold long-term on Sandoval and I think Strasburg and Johnson have a better chance to hold up long term than Lincecum.

Was, Fla, TB, SF, LA would be my order on the trios.
Of course he chooses all 3 east coast teams over the west coast teams. lol
Originally posted by BirdmanJr:
Of course he chooses all 3 east coast teams over the west coast teams. lol

He is more knowledgable on baseball talent than everyone in this room probably put together. Its just an opinion though.
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by BirdmanJr:
Of course he chooses all 3 east coast teams over the west coast teams. lol

He is more knowledgable on baseball talent than everyone in this room probably put together. Its just an opinion though.

he can predict the future?

I'm sorry but I'd take the Dodgers trio over ours and Tampa Bays
Originally posted by BirdmanJr:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by BirdmanJr:
Of course he chooses all 3 east coast teams over the west coast teams. lol

He is more knowledgable on baseball talent than everyone in this room probably put together. Its just an opinion though.

he can predict the future?

I'm sorry but I'd take the Dodgers trio over ours and Tampa Bays

He didnt say he could predict the future. He is giving his opinion on who he would take and who he thinks will hold up better. I agree with him on most of it but thats pretty obvious given the thread. He does follow baseball and knows baseball better than anyone here so I guess his opinion should mean something.
What's crazy about that is kershaw I gonna be a very good pitcher could be top 10 soon and Kemp and either are 2 of the top 10 outfielders in baseball. Could even argue they are 2 of the top 5... I would possibly take them over all of them if Kemp could lower his K totals
Originally posted by skeetskeet:
What's crazy about that is kershaw I gonna be a very good pitcher could be top 10 soon and Kemp and either are 2 of the top 10 outfielders in baseball. Could even argue they are 2 of the top 5... I would possibly take them over all of them if Kemp could lower his K totals

Do Ks really matter? As long as you're productive, who cares if you strikeout 5 times or 200 times?

[ Edited by TheNaitch on Jun 18, 2010 at 17:19:17 ]
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by BirdmanJr:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by BirdmanJr:
Of course he chooses all 3 east coast teams over the west coast teams. lol

He is more knowledgable on baseball talent than everyone in this room probably put together. Its just an opinion though.

he can predict the future?

I'm sorry but I'd take the Dodgers trio over ours and Tampa Bays

He didnt say he could predict the future. He is giving his opinion on who he would take and who he thinks will hold up better. I agree with him on most of it but thats pretty obvious given the thread. He does follow baseball and knows baseball better than anyone here so I guess his opinion should mean something.

there you go with your "knowledge" nonsense. an opinion is an opinion. just because he writes for Baseball America doesnt make his opinion a fact. he happens to like the Nats players longterm. i happen to like the Giants players longterm. we wont know who was right for another 10 years, so stop trying to win the argument right now. you cant.

him saying Strasburg and Johnson will hold up longer in the future is a pure guess. he hasnt even seen Strasburg pitch more than a couple starts in the majors yet. how can he predict how long he will last? the whole reason Lincecum fell to 10th overall was because everyone was all worried about his delivery, yet he has no injury history, and doesnt even have to ice his arm after starts. he pitches pain free from first pitch to last. his mechanics are perfect for his body.

prospect experts would be one of the worst opinions to get on this subject, since they all get infatuated with raw talent like Strasburg and Harper. scouts all drool over their "potential". you getting a Baseball America writer to say he thinks the Nats trio will be better in the future isnt that impressive. until weve seen Strasburgs weaknesses, and how he rebounds from them, you cant even begin to predict the career he will have.
Originally posted by Niners99:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by BirdmanJr:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by BirdmanJr:
Of course he chooses all 3 east coast teams over the west coast teams. lol

He is more knowledgable on baseball talent than everyone in this room probably put together. Its just an opinion though.

he can predict the future?

I'm sorry but I'd take the Dodgers trio over ours and Tampa Bays

He didnt say he could predict the future. He is giving his opinion on who he would take and who he thinks will hold up better. I agree with him on most of it but thats pretty obvious given the thread. He does follow baseball and knows baseball better than anyone here so I guess his opinion should mean something.

there you go with your "knowledge" nonsense. an opinion is an opinion. just because he writes for Baseball America doesnt make his opinion a fact. he happens to like the Nats players longterm. i happen to like the Giants players longterm. we wont know who was right for another 10 years, so stop trying to win the argument right now. you cant.

him saying Strasburg and Johnson will hold up longer in the future is a pure guess. he hasnt even seen Strasburg pitch more than a couple starts in the majors yet. how can he predict how long he will last? the whole reason Lincecum fell to 10th overall was because everyone was all worried about his delivery, yet he has no injury history, and doesnt even have to ice his arm after starts. he pitches pain free from first pitch to last. his mechanics are perfect for his body.

prospect experts would be one of the worst opinions to get on this subject, since they all get infatuated with raw talent like Strasburg and Harper. scouts all drool over their "potential". you getting a Baseball America writer to say he thinks the Nats trio will be better in the future isnt that impressive. until weve seen Strasburgs weaknesses, and how he rebounds from them, you cant even begin to predict the career he will have.

Didnt you use this statement in your post when you tried to make a point..
"Baseball America is the foremost authority on the analysis of farm systems and prospects in baseball."

OK.. so now I email the executive editor of the site that you claim to be the foremost authority and you question his knowledge. I guess they are only good when it serves your purpose.

Of course its an opinion. No one has a crystal ball and can see the future. However
somehow I think I will value the opinion of Jim Callis who does this for a living and truly understands the game over someone like you.

By the way.. your "raw talent" Strasburg just set the ALL TIME record for K's for a pitcher in his first 3 starts. But... I guess that doesnt mean anything because he is unproven.
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by Niners99:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by BirdmanJr:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by BirdmanJr:
Of course he chooses all 3 east coast teams over the west coast teams. lol

He is more knowledgable on baseball talent than everyone in this room probably put together. Its just an opinion though.

he can predict the future?

I'm sorry but I'd take the Dodgers trio over ours and Tampa Bays

He didnt say he could predict the future. He is giving his opinion on who he would take and who he thinks will hold up better. I agree with him on most of it but thats pretty obvious given the thread. He does follow baseball and knows baseball better than anyone here so I guess his opinion should mean something.

there you go with your "knowledge" nonsense. an opinion is an opinion. just because he writes for Baseball America doesnt make his opinion a fact. he happens to like the Nats players longterm. i happen to like the Giants players longterm. we wont know who was right for another 10 years, so stop trying to win the argument right now. you cant.

him saying Strasburg and Johnson will hold up longer in the future is a pure guess. he hasnt even seen Strasburg pitch more than a couple starts in the majors yet. how can he predict how long he will last? the whole reason Lincecum fell to 10th overall was because everyone was all worried about his delivery, yet he has no injury history, and doesnt even have to ice his arm after starts. he pitches pain free from first pitch to last. his mechanics are perfect for his body.

prospect experts would be one of the worst opinions to get on this subject, since they all get infatuated with raw talent like Strasburg and Harper. scouts all drool over their "potential". you getting a Baseball America writer to say he thinks the Nats trio will be better in the future isnt that impressive. until weve seen Strasburgs weaknesses, and how he rebounds from them, you cant even begin to predict the career he will have.

Didnt you use this statement in your post when you tried to make a point..
"Baseball America is the foremost authority on the analysis of farm systems and prospects in baseball."

OK.. so now I email the executive editor of the site that you claim to be the foremost authority and you question his knowledge. I guess they are only good when it serves your purpose.

Of course its an opinion. No one has a crystal ball and can see the future. However
somehow I think I will value the opinion of Jim Callis who does this for a living and truly understands the game over someone like you.

By the way.. your "raw talent" Strasburg just set the ALL TIME record for K's for a pitcher in his first 3 starts. But... I guess that doesnt mean anything because he is unproven.

You are totally twisting the argument to your favor. When he mentioned baseball america, it was in reference to a PROSPECT (Villalona) being ranked #1 in the farm system.

It's valid for him to use the website to judge PROSPECTS and still criticize it for seeing more value in potential vs. established players.
  • Shifty
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 23,429
Strasburg is looking pretty damn awesome so far
Originally posted by Leathaface:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by Niners99:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by BirdmanJr:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by BirdmanJr:
Of course he chooses all 3 east coast teams over the west coast teams. lol

He is more knowledgable on baseball talent than everyone in this room probably put together. Its just an opinion though.

he can predict the future?

I'm sorry but I'd take the Dodgers trio over ours and Tampa Bays

He didnt say he could predict the future. He is giving his opinion on who he would take and who he thinks will hold up better. I agree with him on most of it but thats pretty obvious given the thread. He does follow baseball and knows baseball better than anyone here so I guess his opinion should mean something.

there you go with your "knowledge" nonsense. an opinion is an opinion. just because he writes for Baseball America doesnt make his opinion a fact. he happens to like the Nats players longterm. i happen to like the Giants players longterm. we wont know who was right for another 10 years, so stop trying to win the argument right now. you cant.

him saying Strasburg and Johnson will hold up longer in the future is a pure guess. he hasnt even seen Strasburg pitch more than a couple starts in the majors yet. how can he predict how long he will last? the whole reason Lincecum fell to 10th overall was because everyone was all worried about his delivery, yet he has no injury history, and doesnt even have to ice his arm after starts. he pitches pain free from first pitch to last. his mechanics are perfect for his body.

prospect experts would be one of the worst opinions to get on this subject, since they all get infatuated with raw talent like Strasburg and Harper. scouts all drool over their "potential". you getting a Baseball America writer to say he thinks the Nats trio will be better in the future isnt that impressive. until weve seen Strasburgs weaknesses, and how he rebounds from them, you cant even begin to predict the career he will have.

Didnt you use this statement in your post when you tried to make a point..
"Baseball America is the foremost authority on the analysis of farm systems and prospects in baseball."

OK.. so now I email the executive editor of the site that you claim to be the foremost authority and you question his knowledge. I guess they are only good when it serves your purpose.

Of course its an opinion. No one has a crystal ball and can see the future. However
somehow I think I will value the opinion of Jim Callis who does this for a living and truly understands the game over someone like you.

By the way.. your "raw talent" Strasburg just set the ALL TIME record for K's for a pitcher in his first 3 starts. But... I guess that doesnt mean anything because he is unproven.

You are totally twisting the argument to your favor. When he mentioned baseball america, it was in reference to a PROSPECT (Villalona) being ranked #1 in the farm system.

It's valid for him to use the website to judge PROSPECTS and still criticize it for seeing more value in potential vs. established players.

I'm not twisting anything. Are you saying that the guy who is an expert on prospects suddendly doesnt have any knowledge on established players? Thats ridiculous. Jim Callis is one of the most respected men in his field and knows the game more than some amateur on the Niners Webzone. That is why I sought out his opinion. He was nice enough to respond with his opinion. Thats it.

What I find really funny though is the same guy who criticizies Callis doesnt think the Giants would trade Posey for Strasburg. He also thinks Posey is established and Strasburg is unproven. Go figure.
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by Leathaface:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by Niners99:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by BirdmanJr:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by BirdmanJr:
Of course he chooses all 3 east coast teams over the west coast teams. lol

He is more knowledgable on baseball talent than everyone in this room probably put together. Its just an opinion though.

he can predict the future?

I'm sorry but I'd take the Dodgers trio over ours and Tampa Bays

He didnt say he could predict the future. He is giving his opinion on who he would take and who he thinks will hold up better. I agree with him on most of it but thats pretty obvious given the thread. He does follow baseball and knows baseball better than anyone here so I guess his opinion should mean something.

there you go with your "knowledge" nonsense. an opinion is an opinion. just because he writes for Baseball America doesnt make his opinion a fact. he happens to like the Nats players longterm. i happen to like the Giants players longterm. we wont know who was right for another 10 years, so stop trying to win the argument right now. you cant.

him saying Strasburg and Johnson will hold up longer in the future is a pure guess. he hasnt even seen Strasburg pitch more than a couple starts in the majors yet. how can he predict how long he will last? the whole reason Lincecum fell to 10th overall was because everyone was all worried about his delivery, yet he has no injury history, and doesnt even have to ice his arm after starts. he pitches pain free from first pitch to last. his mechanics are perfect for his body.

prospect experts would be one of the worst opinions to get on this subject, since they all get infatuated with raw talent like Strasburg and Harper. scouts all drool over their "potential". you getting a Baseball America writer to say he thinks the Nats trio will be better in the future isnt that impressive. until weve seen Strasburgs weaknesses, and how he rebounds from them, you cant even begin to predict the career he will have.

Didnt you use this statement in your post when you tried to make a point..
"Baseball America is the foremost authority on the analysis of farm systems and prospects in baseball."

OK.. so now I email the executive editor of the site that you claim to be the foremost authority and you question his knowledge. I guess they are only good when it serves your purpose.

Of course its an opinion. No one has a crystal ball and can see the future. However
somehow I think I will value the opinion of Jim Callis who does this for a living and truly understands the game over someone like you.

By the way.. your "raw talent" Strasburg just set the ALL TIME record for K's for a pitcher in his first 3 starts. But... I guess that doesnt mean anything because he is unproven.

You are totally twisting the argument to your favor. When he mentioned baseball america, it was in reference to a PROSPECT (Villalona) being ranked #1 in the farm system.

It's valid for him to use the website to judge PROSPECTS and still criticize it for seeing more value in potential vs. established players.

I'm not twisting anything. Are you saying that the guy who is an expert on prospects suddendly doesnt have any knowledge on established players? Thats ridiculous. Jim Callis is one of the most respected men in his field and knows the game more than some amateur on the Niners Webzone. That is why I sought out his opinion. He was nice enough to respond with his opinion. Thats it.

What I find really funny though is the same guy who criticizies Callis doesnt think the Giants would trade Posey for Strasburg. He also thinks Posey is established and Strasburg is unproven. Go figure.

youve TOTALLY been twisting the things i say. you misconstrue what im trying to explain to you, and use it to talk crap. a Baseball America writer's OPINION on how good some players will end up in 10 years has literally NOTHING to do with my saying Baseball America ranked Villalona number 1 in 2007 to prove you wrong.

youve consistently through this whole argument misunderstood my statements, and instead of making sure you understand, you jump to conclusions and accuse me of being stupid.

let me map this out for you one last time. maybe this will be understood easily.

we were originally talking about a Lincecum/Sandoval/Posey for Strasburg/Zimmerman/Harper, with the emphasis on Lincecum and Strasburg, Sandoval and Zimmerman, and Posey and Harper.

i dont get why you keep taking the Strasburg/Posey argument out of context. when youre comparing Posey and Harper in that deal, hes WAY more proven. Posey has breezed through the minors, living up to the hype. hes came the majors and proven he can hit up here as well. Harper hasnt done anything yet. hes a kid with very raw potential whos years away from even being called up.

Strasburg is being compared to Lincecum in this deal, meaning Lincecum has already won 2 CY, and Strasburg has 3 starts in his career. my opinion that the Giants wouldnt deal their stud hitting catching prospect (a need position) for Strasburg (not a need position) should have nothing to do with thinking Posey is more proven than Harper, or Lincecum is more proven than Strasburg. youre mixing 2 different things.

youre coming across as an arrogant a-hole when you dismiss my opinions as "amateur", and beleive yours are fact. unless you call up Brian Sabean and get his answer to whether or not they would deal Posey for Strasburg, your opinion is just that, with no proof. a Baseball America writer can say whatever they think as well about those 3 player deals, but until 10 years from now when everything pans out, he cant be proven right either.

i disagree with your opinion, but respect it. you disagree with mine, and patronize me. youre talking down to me over an opinion you cant even prove.

i tend to side with common sense, which says "hey, a 26 year old whos already won 2 CY, a 5th overall pick catching prospect whos passed the minor league test with flying colors and is already looking like a veteran hitter at the major league level, and a 24 year old whos already finished 2nd for a batting title and 7th in an MVP voting, is a more valuable trio than a guy whos made 3 career starts, a guy whos 17 years old with no professional experience yet, and a GG 3B whos made one AS team and is a solid, proven player."

you feel differently. thats fine. i dont care that youve played, i dont care that youve umped, i dont care that youve seen more games than me (only because youre older), i dont care that youve been a Giants fan longer, and i dont care if you THINK all that means your opinions are somehow better than mine. i have no doubt in my mind that my baseball IQ is very high compared to most other fans, and that ive had enough experience with baseball in general to have a legit opinion on most anything.

i can tell that you dont like being wrong, and you dont like being disagreed with. sometimes people disagree with you, and sometimes there isnt a right or wrong answer. get over it.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone