First Bush and then Mayo, USC has had some major violations but the NCAA has sat back and just "investigated".
I also thought it was funny that ESPN reported the NCAA came down very harsh on Memphis and Yahoo Sports said they should have been much more strict.
Just wondering why there hasn't been much to do with different violations in different sports, unless USC is paying someone off to keep them out of the woods.
There are 301 users in the forums
Why did the NCAA come down hard on Memphis but USC gets away?
Aug 23, 2009 at 8:52 PM
- global_nomad
- Veteran
- Posts: 14,827
Aug 23, 2009 at 9:56 PM
- VaBeachNiner
- Veteran
- Posts: 56,112
Was the Reggie Bush case ever proven?
Aug 25, 2009 at 2:40 AM
- 49erfan3252
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,535
Originally posted by VaBeachNiner:
Was the Reggie Bush case ever proven?
I don't think so.
Sep 2, 2009 at 8:20 AM
- TX9R
- Veteran
- Posts: 8,348
Same reason as OU getting nothing for the Bomar thing, big money generating schools.