There are 147 users in the forums

Why did the NCAA come down hard on Memphis but USC gets away?

Share this on Facebook Share this on Twitter Share this on Google+ Share this on LinkedIn Share this on Pinterest Share this on StumbleUpon Share this on Reddit Share via SMS Share via Email
Aug 23, 2009 at 8:52 PM
#1
First Bush and then Mayo, USC has had some major violations but the NCAA has sat back and just "investigated".

I also thought it was funny that ESPN reported the NCAA came down very harsh on Memphis and Yahoo Sports said they should have been much more strict.

Just wondering why there hasn't been much to do with different violations in different sports, unless USC is paying someone off to keep them out of the woods.
Aug 23, 2009 at 9:56 PM
#2
Was the Reggie Bush case ever proven?
Aug 25, 2009 at 2:40 AM
#3
Originally posted by VaBeachNiner:
Was the Reggie Bush case ever proven?

I don't think so.
Sep 2, 2009 at 8:20 AM
#4
  • TX9R
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 8,298
Same reason as OU getting nothing for the Bomar thing, big money generating schools.
Search
Tumblr
Google+
 Share 49erswebzone