Originally posted by hondakillerzx:
Originally posted by MarkD:the ravens players wouldve left regardless if they won or lost that superbowl. its not about winning the last game, its about what the player does in the coarse of a season or seasons that gets them a fat contract. id rather win a superbowl and be f**ked by the salary cap than lose a superbowl and get f**ked by the salary cap
Originally posted by xtm059:
This is pretty close to the stupidest poll question i've ever answered. Nobody wants to lose. Ever. I'll present you with a better question:
What's the point of having talented players if you don't win the Super Bowl?
Sure would be great to go to the SB and lose three more times to save cap space. Are you f**king kidding me?
The question wasn't about losing. It is about scenario. Example the from this Ravens this year. They didn't cap plan and now they are going to be a s**t team again.
So lets put it in this context. Win and become a crap team because you can't sign your own free agents back. OR lose and have a better chance at winning multiple championships because your main players are already under contract? I am not saying throw the damn game. Duh
uhhhhh yeah no s**t wouldn't every person who isn't retarded want that?
Now to the other guy a superbowl is > than everything. I would love to be the bounty hunting Saints or the 0-16 Lions if it meant another superbowl. How can you all not realize how rare and difficult and once in a lifetime a superbowl win is? Sure we did it 5 times so that argument can be made but s**t had to go perfectly for that to happen. We had the most dominant team of the 80's and still only won 4 out of 10. The greatest dynasties of all time could only muster a max of 4 wins in a decade. Getting one single win is a feat so to act so trivial about it is stupid.
[ Edited by BayArea on Mar 30, 2013 at 2:51 PM ]