I hope Dorsey and Woodson walk into 49ers headquarters and come out as 49ers | Page 6

Mar 13, 2013 at 1:15 PM

Norwalks_Best
Member
Posts: 2,781

Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:

Originally posted by LottOfDefense:

Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:
If we sign Woodson, the next domino to fall is to trade for Revis.

Stop playing with my emotions!!

Total speculation on my part, but we have more picks than we're going to make, and we clearly have a desire to revamp our secondary. I can see that deal happening more so than signing a free agent corner.

I agree we have extra picks this year & next year

Mar 13, 2013 at 1:23 PM

#77

captnkos
Veteran
Posts: 362

Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:
Originally posted by LottOfDefense:
Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:
If we sign Woodson, the next domino to fall is to trade for Revis.

Stop playing with my emotions!!

Total speculation on my part, but we have more picks than we're going to make, and we clearly have a desire to revamp our secondary. I can see that deal happening more so than signing a free agent corner.

How do we pay for him?

Mar 13, 2013 at 1:29 PM

#78

robniner
Veteran
Posts: 5,547

Originally posted by captnkos:
How do we pay for him?

I would prefer either Reed or the younger Pollard

Mar 13, 2013 at 1:36 PM

#79

GhostofFredDean74
Hall of Fame
Posts: 30,082

Originally posted by captnkos:

Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:

Originally posted by LottOfDefense:

Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:
If we sign Woodson, the next domino to fall is to trade for Revis.

Stop playing with my emotions!!

Total speculation on my part, but we have more picks than we're going to make, and we clearly have a desire to revamp our secondary. I can see that deal happening more so than signing a free agent corner.

How do we pay for him?

His cap number is only $6M for this year. You can cut Rogers and essentially replace him with Revis and it's pretty much a wash, or you can extend him (which lowers his 2013 cap number and spreads out the hit over the length of the deal).

Mar 13, 2013 at 1:37 PM

#80

GhostofFredDean74
Hall of Fame
Posts: 30,082

Originally posted by captnkos:

Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:

Originally posted by LottOfDefense:

Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:
If we sign Woodson, the next domino to fall is to trade for Revis.

Stop playing with my emotions!!

Total speculation on my part, but we have more picks than we're going to make, and we clearly have a desire to revamp our secondary. I can see that deal happening more so than signing a free agent corner.

How do we pay for him?

Damn, the zone servers are blowin up....

[ Edited by GhostofFredDean74 on Mar 13, 2013 at 1:38 PM ]

Mar 13, 2013 at 2:19 PM

#81

truekingcarlos
Member
Posts: 1,714

Why? They are scrubs. We used to have better players on our team at the same positions.

Mar 13, 2013 at 2:44 PM

#82

carioca49er
Veteran
Posts: 75

We're getting a little heavy on vets that are past their prime, but there's no denying Woodson can make a big contribution

Mar 13, 2013 at 2:45 PM

#83

NinerBuff
The Election Dude
Posts: 21,443

Originally posted by carioca49er:
We're getting a little heavy on vets that are past their prime, but there's no denying Woodson can make a big contribution

He can be a good ball hawk, but against a team with speed, we'd be in trouble.

Mar 13, 2013 at 2:46 PM

#84

SFrush
Veteran
Posts: 5,050

Originally posted by robniner:
I would prefer either Reed or the younger Pollard

Pollard isn't a significant upgrade over whitner.

Mar 13, 2013 at 2:48 PM

#85

AXEGRINDER
Veteran
Posts: 25,671

Originally posted by carioca49er:
We're getting a little heavy on vets that are past their prime, but there's no denying Woodson can make a big contribution

Yes but see those guys will be gone and younger cheaper guys will eventually take their place after they soak them for every last ounce of knowledge they have left.

That's the plan. We didn't stockpile all these draft picks if the plan was just to get older. That's makes no sense.

Mar 13, 2013 at 2:53 PM

#86

Young2Rice
Veteran
Posts: 70,011

Originally posted by carioca49er:
We're getting a little heavy on vets that are past their prime, but there's no denying Woodson can make a big contribution

Woodson is way too old for me. He just looks slow as hell out there. We torched him this year.

Mar 13, 2013 at 3:01 PM

#87

WRATHman44
Staff
Posts: 16,893

Originally posted by SFrush:

Originally posted by robniner:
I would prefer either Reed or the younger Pollard

Pollard isn't a significant upgrade over whitner.

Boldin, Gonzo, and anyone else who caught a pass over Whitner disagree. I like him. He is tough as nails, but dude's height and coverage KILLED us.

Mar 13, 2013 at 3:05 PM

#88

Norwalks_Best
Member
Posts: 2,781

Originally posted by Young2Rice:

Originally posted by carioca49er:
We're getting a little heavy on vets that are past their prime, but there's no denying Woodson can make a big contribution

Woodson is way too old for me. He just looks slow as hell out there. We torched him this year.

Dylan DeSimone ‏@DeSimone80
Really hoping Charles Woodson hasn't signed anything. Someone get an intern to hide all the pens in the office! #49ers

Mar 13, 2013 at 4:41 PM

#89

kronik
Veteran
Posts: 4,316

Yes with Dorsey, HELL NO TO WOODSON. Are you serious? The secondary requires athleticism and speed. At his age, he will get burned more often than not. Football is a young man's league. Hell no to Woodson

[ Edited by kronik on Mar 13, 2013 at 4:41 PM ]

Mar 13, 2013 at 7:23 PM

#90

robniner
Veteran
Posts: 5,547

The thing Woodson can provide would be veteran leadership with postseason experience.