Feb 24, 2013 at 08:50:30
#1
- SanFranFanfrmVa
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 164
The 49ers are so tight against the cap that Baalke can't franchise Goldson because of Alex Smith's contract. If Baalke can't trade Alex Smith and losses Goldson in the process he will look very foolish.
Feb 24, 2013 at 08:57:10
#2
- susweel
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 48,407
patience young grasshoppa
Feb 24, 2013 at 09:02:13
#3
- okdkid
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 7,095
Chillax.
Feb 24, 2013 at 10:00:28
#4
- SonocoNinerFan
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 13,437
Jeebus . . . I hope Baalke realizes this. We've only been talking about it for about five months . . . sarcasm
[ Edited by SonocoNinerFan on Feb 24, 2013 at 10:02:59 ]
Feb 24, 2013 at 10:02:09
#5
- Hopper
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 4,642
This is a slight concern. There's a better chance than I assumed Goldson won't be franchised.
Feb 24, 2013 at 10:02:27
#6
- crabman82
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 3,597
i dont see the problem here. you try to trade smith and if you cant you cut him. i am a huge fan of alex smith and even i know it wont be the end of the world if we dont get a mid rounder for him or get to choose the team he goes to.
Feb 24, 2013 at 10:09:06
#7
- pdizo916
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 13,396
I'm not too sure that he will be tagged.
Feb 24, 2013 at 11:03:32
#8
- LasVegasWally
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 4,446
Too much drama.
Trent is WAYYYYYYY t smart.
Feb 24, 2013 at 11:09:33
#9
- CityKing415
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 526
signing Goldson should be his #1 concern.. all pro player vs 2nd string qb..who would you take care of first
Feb 24, 2013 at 11:19:26
#10
- leakyfausett
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 4,772
We are going to see a big cap savings no matter what we decide to do with Alex because he will not be back also will see decent savings from Akers and a couple of others. They will hopefully sign Goldson long term and find a very good DB in free agency and fill the gaps with all those draft picks we will have.
Feb 24, 2013 at 11:21:44
#11
Who's to say that even if they had the cap space that they would even franchise Goldson, again? Maybe they feel like some of us feel and that Goldson just isn't worth the money he's asking for.
Feb 24, 2013 at 11:23:52
#12
- AZ9erfan520
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 192
Matt Maiocco just tweeted that sources say 9ers are leaning towards not using the franchise tag on Goldson. In the article, it states that the 9ers and Goldson are "not believed" to be close to an agreement. Hopefully we can get something done. I fear we are getting rid of the wrong safety.
Feb 24, 2013 at 11:27:24
#13
- Janitor
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 15,292
Feb 24, 2013 at 11:27:43
#14
- JerryRice1848
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 7,460
What if we tag Smith instead
Feb 24, 2013 at 12:10:48
#15
- nj9er
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 2,005
The Foles to KC rumors are BS especially if you get a Qb who was top 3 in Qb rating before being benched. When all said and done we will probably get KCs 2nd round pick and a conditional 3 to 5th next year. KC makes out with a day one starting tackle and a capable QB and if they keep Bowe they can push to take wildcard in AFC from Indy or Cincy (don't think Smith will take division from Payton)
We get 2 picks on top 33 spots and 2 of 3 in a row a DL in 1st and WR in second round. I think CB will be addressed on FA since we need a #1 guy and that late in the draft your not getting a Patrick Peterson. We could even use that extra number 2nd round to package for Revis. Jets have 2 #1 corners and not much else talent wise.