Originally posted by shawny:
Originally posted by Ajanke:
Originally posted by shawny:DNA isn't proof of rape it's proof of sex.
Originally posted by LoneWolf:
Originally posted by shawny:
Nope. In fact, that girl was pregnant with Perrish Cox's baby (DNA Test proved it), and COX said he never had sex with her. AND Cox's teamate testified he saw Perrish take her passed out body into a room and say "She's ready".
So yeah, he was guilty as all f**k and still wasn't convicted, even after all that evidence and lies by him. So when the posters on this board say its just a money grab and she's a b***h, and rich athletes don't do this type of a thing, they just need to look no further than the Perrish Cox case.
Actually she did lie and it was proven, but Cox lied as well, the issue there was there was no evidense to convict him, other then DNA (which doesnt always prove someone was guilty) and witnesses saying they saw her kissing all over cox and his girlfriend.
Perrish Cox "I never had sex with that woman" (DNA test proves he fathered her child)
Demaryius thomas said he carried her passed out body into the bedroom and said "I think she's ready"
If you need more evidence that a rape occured than DNA evidence and a credible eye witness you are part of the problem with why most people get away with rapes.
You're right, when Cox said he never had sex with her, (not that they had consensual sex) and the DNA proved otherwise, nothing fishy there. When an eye witness says that he carried her passed out body to a bedroom and said she was ready for sex, nothing out of line there.
Seriously wtf is wrong with some of you. What is evidence of a rape then if not that?
Maybe she was saying she wanted to have sex with him before she "passed out"?
