Bulaga and Perry are not in the same company as the Niners losing Manningham, William, Hunter, and hopefully not J Smith.
Perry was nothing special and Bulaga was average at best.
There are 613 users in the forums
INJURED RESERVE - Because the media seems to forget...
Jan 9, 2013 at 4:41 PM
- rondoman
- Veteran
- Posts: 507
Jan 9, 2013 at 4:44 PM
- NickSh49
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,939
Originally posted by rondoman:
Bulaga and Perry are not in the same company as the Niners losing Manningham, William, Hunter, and hopefully not J Smith.
Perry was nothing special and Bulaga was average at best.
Oh, so losing a starting tackle & a starting pass rush specialist is not a big deal?

Let's lose Brooks & Staley and see how that works out.
Jan 9, 2013 at 4:47 PM
- rondoman
- Veteran
- Posts: 507
Originally posted by NickSh49:
Oh, so losing a starting tackle & a starting pass rush specialist is not a big deal?
Let's lose Brooks & Staley and see how that works out.
This time the Packers got Neal, Walden, Shields on D and Evan Dietrich-Smith on the O Line. They had none of these guys in week one. EDS is better than Bulaga, and Walden is better than Perry. So yeah, theyve actually IMPROVED since the season has started in that respect.
[ Edited by rondoman on Jan 9, 2013 at 4:49 PM ]
Jan 9, 2013 at 4:49 PM
- rondoman
- Veteran
- Posts: 507
Originally posted by NickSh49:Also, asinine argument stating us losing Brooks and Staley. Your logic is saying all teams starters are equal, one of the dumbest things I ever read.
Originally posted by rondoman:
Bulaga and Perry are not in the same company as the Niners losing Manningham, William, Hunter, and hopefully not J Smith.
Perry was nothing special and Bulaga was average at best.
Oh, so losing a starting tackle & a starting pass rush specialist is not a big deal?
Let's lose Brooks & Staley and see how that works out.
Jan 9, 2013 at 4:51 PM
- paperplanemedia
- Member
- Posts: 1,289
We are going into the game with 2 kickers? We should be worried.
Jan 9, 2013 at 4:54 PM
- natrone06
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,143
Originally posted by NickSh49:Originally posted by rondoman:Bulaga and Perry are not in the same company as the Niners losing Manningham, William, Hunter, and hopefully not J Smith.
Perry was nothing special and Bulaga was average at best.
Oh, so losing a starting tackle & a starting pass rush specialist is not a big deal?
Let's lose Brooks & Staley and see how that works out.
Bulaga was playing terrible and Walden>>>>>>>Perry so not a huge deal for packers.
Jan 9, 2013 at 4:57 PM
- NickSh49
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,939
Originally posted by rondoman:
Originally posted by NickSh49:
Oh, so losing a starting tackle & a starting pass rush specialist is not a big deal?
Let's lose Brooks & Staley and see how that works out.
This time the Packers got Neal, Walden, Shields on D Evan Dietrich-Smith on the O Line. They had none of these guys in week one. EDS is better than Bulaga, and Walden is better than Perry. So yeah, theyve actually IMPROVED since the season has started in that respect.
Mike Neal is not a great player. When they lost Cullen Jenkins to the Eagles, Neal played seven games in his place and was not very effective.
Evan Dietriich-Smith plays center. He is playing in place of Jeff Saturday, not Bryan Bulaga. Not sure where you're going with that except if EDS is better than Saturday.
You have rookie undrafted free agent Don Barclay right tackle due to injury. You've got Marshall Newhouse at left tackle, who is nothing special. That's why they drafted Sherrod & Bulaga. How have they gotten better at the tackle position exactly?
And if you think Walden is better than Perry, that's your opinion. Perry only has seven career games under his belt. It is what it is.
Jan 9, 2013 at 4:58 PM
- Kronos2560
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,243
Well Alex isnt playing in the game. Thats the biggest loss to either team
Jan 9, 2013 at 4:59 PM
- NickSh49
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,939
Originally posted by paperplanemedia:
We are going into the game with 2 kickers? We should be worried.
Well obviously there's that too. But it's not like our team is in shambles.
Jan 9, 2013 at 5:00 PM
- rondoman
- Veteran
- Posts: 507
Originally posted by NickSh49:
Originally posted by rondoman:
Originally posted by NickSh49:
Oh, so losing a starting tackle & a starting pass rush specialist is not a big deal?
Let's lose Brooks & Staley and see how that works out.
This time the Packers got Neal, Walden, Shields on D Evan Dietrich-Smith on the O Line. They had none of these guys in week one. EDS is better than Bulaga, and Walden is better than Perry. So yeah, theyve actually IMPROVED since the season has started in that respect.
Mike Neal is not a great player. When they lost Cullen Jenkins to the Eagles, Neal played seven games in his place and was not very effective.
Evan Dietriich-Smith plays center. He is playing in place of Jeff Saturday, not Bryan Bulaga. Not sure where you're going with that except if EDS is better than Saturday.
You have rookie undrafted free agent Don Barclay right tackle due to injury. You've got Marshall Newhouse at left tackle, who is nothing special. That's why they drafted Sherrod & Bulaga. How have they gotten better at the tackle position exactly?
And if you think Walden is better than Perry, that's your opinion. Perry only has seven career games under his belt. It is what it is.
All Im saying is that these injuries are nothing compared to what we have lost. The Packers can still operate at a high level without the guys that are hurt. For the most part they are far the healthier team.
Jan 9, 2013 at 5:02 PM
- NickSh49
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,939
Originally posted by rondoman:
Originally posted by NickSh49:
Originally posted by rondoman:
Originally posted by NickSh49:
Oh, so losing a starting tackle & a starting pass rush specialist is not a big deal?
Let's lose Brooks & Staley and see how that works out.
This time the Packers got Neal, Walden, Shields on D Evan Dietrich-Smith on the O Line. They had none of these guys in week one. EDS is better than Bulaga, and Walden is better than Perry. So yeah, theyve actually IMPROVED since the season has started in that respect.
Mike Neal is not a great player. When they lost Cullen Jenkins to the Eagles, Neal played seven games in his place and was not very effective.
Evan Dietriich-Smith plays center. He is playing in place of Jeff Saturday, not Bryan Bulaga. Not sure where you're going with that except if EDS is better than Saturday.
You have rookie undrafted free agent Don Barclay right tackle due to injury. You've got Marshall Newhouse at left tackle, who is nothing special. That's why they drafted Sherrod & Bulaga. How have they gotten better at the tackle position exactly?
And if you think Walden is better than Perry, that's your opinion. Perry only has seven career games under his belt. It is what it is.
All Im saying is that these injuries are nothing compared to what we have lost. The Packers can still operate at a high level without the guys that are hurt. For the most part they are far the healthier team.
I think it's about even personally. We are a running team. Our main RB and his new, effective backup are 100% healthy. Our o-line is 100% healthy.
Last year, we were going into the playoffs with Crabs, VD, Kyle Williams, Swain,& later got back Delanie. That's pretty much it.
Now we have Crabs, Moss, Ginn, VD, healthy Delanie, & Jenkins. I like our chances better with those guys personally.
Jan 9, 2013 at 5:02 PM
- TheWooLick
- Veteran
- Posts: 44,717
Originally posted by paperplanemedia:We are going into the game with 2 kickers? We should be worried.
Why is that?
Jan 9, 2013 at 5:07 PM
- paperplanemedia
- Member
- Posts: 1,289
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by paperplanemedia:
We are going into the game with 2 kickers? We should be worried.
Why is that?
We know one has been struggling and we have no idea how the other will do in the swirling winds of Candlestick.
Jan 9, 2013 at 5:22 PM
- GNielsen
- Member
- Posts: 5,464
A couple of the Packers receivers are not at 100% as well. Nelson evidently has a knee problem and Jennings has something he's been dealing with.