RB Carries: 8 for 36 yards (4.5 ypc)
Passing: 5 for 6 for 40 yards (6.67 ypa)
QB rush: 3 carries for 57 yards (19 yards per carry)
Keep in mind that was against a top 5 run defense. If kaepernick hits that throw to moss, these numbers are spotless
There are 66 users in the forums
Originally posted by jreff22:Originally posted by pasodoc9er:Jreff, I like it, but like you, making major changes with a green rook is really foolish. Work on it next yr in Tc and PS.
Dont have time to wait. This formation can be broken down and defended easily. Its a big reason why the read option doesn't really work in the NFL. The D is too fast and smart to be fooled on a consistent basis. Taking away the TE and a 3rd option at WR and replacing them with RB's or a WR (Ginn) hampers the O. You are putting a WR in an unnatural position (see Ginn) or making a RB go out for a pass. Bring the CB's up to jam the WR's and have the SS play the next dangerous guy you can defend this easily. The problem is you keep the weapons bottled up in the backfield and run the risk of having inadequate personnel on the field for a decent audible. If they line up in this set say with Gore, VD, and James and motion out to a pro set it can work. But with Gore, Miller, and Tufuku (sp) you aren't fooling anybody. None are fast enough to beat a DB or most athletic LB's....might as well run the jumbo and get a -2 yard gain.
We are trying to get cute again with these formations and I dont like the cute s**t.
Originally posted by RichnSanRamon:
Picture this: Bug-eye formation. QB pre-snap read is blitz w/man coverage behind it. Checks to play where players on both sides of QB flare into the flat. He picks one. Could be #23, #21, #46, #85...or #19. Most likely it would be 21 in traditional pistol position behind QB who would remain in the backfield to take on blitz. Flats would be open, putting #23 or #46 in space with the football, looking for them to make first guy miss and then off to the races.
The bug-eye is going to challenge outside linebackers with one-on-one matchups in the flat against whoever lines up on either side of the QB.
Originally posted by Young2Rice:
http://blogs.palmbeachpost.com/thedailydolphin/2012/12/12/coaches-film-breaking-down-the-key-plays-from-the-miami-dolphins-loss-to-the-san-francisco-49ers/
PRetty good summary of some plays



Originally posted by SFTifoso:
I wish we would run the same offense we ran with Alex, but with deeper routes, and let Colin extend plays by using his speed .
Originally posted by Ronnie49Lott:
We break down the 49ers use of the full-house pistol, "bug eye" formation in their win over the Miami Dolphins.
While the 49ers offensive philosophy is built around power rushing, the team opens the door to a wide variety of schemes and game plans within that broader philosophy. The team mixes up their formations and personnel packages week in and week out, as they game plan against their opponents' weaknesses and for the 49ers own strengths.
Amidst all the discussion about the QB position, and the concerns some have about the team's opportunities in 2012, I continually drift back to the idea that the coaching staff is working to figure out exactly what they want to do with all these new pieces. The addition of Colin Kaepernick as starting quarterback and LaMIchael James as backup running back has put the staff in a position where they need to figure out how they can mix and match these parts.
This idea scares some people, which is quite understandable. The 49ers got to the NFC Championship Game with a specific philosophy, and had gotten off to a 6-2 start this season. Although there was clearly downside to this philosophy, the upside was the idea of there being a certain steadiness to it.
http://www.ninersnation.com/2012/12/11/3755590/49ers-vs-dolphins-colin-kaepernick-and-the-bug-eye-diamond-full-house
Originally posted by Young2Rice:
http://blogs.palmbeachpost.com/thedailydolphin/2012/12/12/coaches-film-breaking-down-the-key-plays-from-the-miami-dolphins-loss-to-the-san-francisco-49ers/
PRetty good summary of some plays