Brandon Jacobs Suspended (per twitter)

It seems he wants respect for his accomplishments with the Giants??? ...but this is THE NINERS

f**k that , seems to me he wants everything handed to him ....he has been healthy for awhile now , something tells me if he had worked his ass off in practice, he would get more snaps on gameday .....but now I know why a buddy of mine (a lifelong giants fan) said Jacobs was "Lazy" and was glad the Giants got rid of him

Funny how he posts all those pics of his time with the Giants and talks like he misses playing there. In an interview with Jim Rome earlier this year, he admitted that he left NY because of the money.

If he was really so in love with the place, he should have just taken the pay cut to stay there, rather than whining about playing time.

Originally posted by mickey49:
Funny how he posts all those pics of his time with the Giants and talks like he misses playing there. In an interview with Jim Rome earlier this year, he admitted that he left NY because of the money.

If he was really so in love with the place, he should have just taken the pay cut to stay there, rather than whining about playing time.

I dont think Coughlin would have took him back , even at a reduced salary, his attitude killed any chance of getting on the field ...I bet he has been whining for a long time , and we all know whining wont fly with Harbaugh.........but now that he filed a grievance, he might force his release ...and it IS possible a playoff team could sign him , just to get information about our playbook ..he is a shady cry baby, and wouldnt put it past him to play dirty like that ..

I say pay him for the rest of the season , and let him rot on the inactive list

Originally posted by NeeJ49er:

Originally posted by mickey49:
Funny how he posts all those pics of his time with the Giants and talks like he misses playing there. In an interview with Jim Rome earlier this year, he admitted that he left NY because of the money.

If he was really so in love with the place, he should have just taken the pay cut to stay there, rather than whining about playing time.

I dont think Coughlin would have took him back , even at a reduced salary, his attitude killed any chance of getting on the field ...I bet he has been whining for a long time , and we all know whining wont fly with Harbaugh.........but now that he filed a grievance, he might force his release ...and it IS possible a playoff team could sign him , just to get information about our playbook ..he is a shady cry baby, and wouldnt put it past him to play dirty like that ..

I say pay him for the rest of the season , and let him rot on the inactive list

I thought "suspend w/pay" was one of the options listed in the article about the grievance. I choose that one.

Pay the man.

Not worth going to the extreme over this, and potentially backfiring.

$167k is chump change. Let it go.

Originally posted by JTsBiggestFan:
Pay the man.

Not worth going to the extreme over this, and potentially backfiring.

$167k is chump change. Let it go.

Why? You ever heard of the term insubordination? He isn't owed s**t and needs to be held accountable for his actions. These idiots needs to stay off of Twitter.

They probably suspended him without pay so that way if the appeals board rules a compromise needs to be met that we will simply pay him to stay away from the team lol.

Originally posted by NeeJ49er:

Originally posted by mickey49:
Funny how he posts all those pics of his time with the Giants and talks like he misses playing there. In an interview with Jim Rome earlier this year, he admitted that he left NY because of the money.

If he was really so in love with the place, he should have just taken the pay cut to stay there, rather than whining about playing time.

I dont think Coughlin would have took him back , even at a reduced salary, his attitude killed any chance of getting on the field ...I bet he has been whining for a long time , and we all know whining wont fly with Harbaugh.........but now that he filed a grievance, he might force his release ...and it IS possible a playoff team could sign him , just to get information about our playbook ..he is a shady cry baby, and wouldnt put it past him to play dirty like that ..

I say pay him for the rest of the season , and let him rot on the inactive list

Yah, I can't see any coach putting up with a cry baby. It's a shame, 'cause I think he can still contribute to a team. He just can't seem to keep his mouth (or thumbs) shut...

Originally posted by JTsBiggestFan:

Pay the man.

Not worth going to the extreme over this, and potentially backfiring.

$167k is chump change. Let it go.

The car has already stalled. There is no more backfiring. The Niners need to make this statement regardless of the financial amount.
They owe him nothing.

to be honest , I dont want to release him ....let him rot on the inactive list ... because I can see the damn Packers picking him up ..and I would hate to see a whiny little cry baby getting scooped up by a playoff team as a reward for his b***hing and complaining

but then again , seeing Cowboy, Willis and the rest of the fellas grinding him up would be a good thing

After reading several articles on this, seems even many NYG fans don't want him back or doubt Coughlin would even re-sign him. He apparently burned some bridges as he was leaving there. Now all of a sudden, the Niners are the "bad guys" and he "learned his lesson" or whatever. I bet he'll play for another team entirely (not SF or NY) next season...as a back up, too, and won't get much playing time either, then gets released or suspended mid-season again for complaining. Wouldn't be surprised if it played out like that.

f**k him. He can suck a fat dick

You know the sad thing? -The Jacobs signing cock-blocked us from re-signing Blake Costanzo, lol and guess what else? The moment this bum goes on suspension we're looking to pick up a special teams guy.

The #49ers didn't provide a reason for Brandon Jacobs' suspension. DT Ray McDonald said it was explained ...

that Jacobs was being a "distraction." "From the coaching standpoint, they don't want any distractions on the team," he said. "So, he was being a distraction. They felt he was being a distraction, so they felt they needed to do something about it." McDonald was asked if he agreed with the decision: "I guess," McDonald said. "If he's not about the team. And the coaches feel that he's not trying to help the team, they made the right decision."

Originally posted by WookieOftheYear:
The #49ers didn't provide a reason for Brandon Jacobs' suspension. DT Ray McDonald said it was explained ...

that Jacobs was being a "distraction." "From the coaching standpoint, they don't want any distractions on the team," he said. "So, he was being a distraction. They felt he was being a distraction, so they felt they needed to do something about it." McDonald was asked if he agreed with the decision: "I guess," McDonald said. "If he's not about the team. And the coaches feel that he's not trying to help the team, they made the right decision."

ever since that "we're not good enough" post on twitter i've feel that not only is not helping, he's actually undermining the coaching staff.