There are 79 users in the forums
Originally posted by Allx9er:
Originally posted by monsterzero789:
Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:
Originally posted by Allx9er:
Two games 3 points. Which is exactly what this D is suppose to do against 2 bottom dwellers.
Are you serious? The Bills were one of the better offensive teams in the league, Fitzpatrick was leading the league in TD passes and their running game was top 3....until they showed up in Candlestick yesterday.
Yup. They were averaging 28 ppg, which was best in the league
Their offense put up big numbers but we knew or shoulda known they weren't going to be able to run the ball. Being able to take advantage of a 1 dimensional passing team is right in the niners wheel house.
How can suggest that the bills D isnt bottom dwelling at this point?
Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:Originally posted by Allx9er:Originally posted by monsterzero789:Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:Originally posted by Allx9er:Two games 3 points. Which is exactly what this D is suppose to do against 2 bottom dwellers.
Are you serious? The Bills were one of the better offensive teams in the league, Fitzpatrick was leading the league in TD passes and their running game was top 3....until they showed up in Candlestick yesterday.
Yup. They were averaging 28 ppg, which was best in the league
Their offense put up big numbers but we knew or shoulda known they weren't going to be able to run the ball. Being able to take advantage of a 1 dimensional passing team is right in the niners wheel house.
How can suggest that the bills D isnt bottom dwelling at this point?
Nobody is suggesting their defense is anything but historically awful. But as you know, our D doesn't play their D, so that's not an issue. You said, "that's what our D is supposed to do against 2 bottom dwellers." I pointed out that offensively, they were anything but bottom dwellers until they played us. This whole thread is about OUR apparent regression on defense....this isn't about other team's defense, and clearly, that wasn't my point to begin with.
Originally posted by Allx9er:
I guess i should have been more clear/specific when applying the term bottom dwellers as i meant it towards the overall success, structure and future outlook of the previous 2 opponents.
Jets=bottom dwellers
Bills=1 legged man in a footrace (at least against us)
Originally posted by fastforward:
Originally posted by Allx9er:
I guess i should have been more clear/specific when applying the term bottom dwellers as i meant it towards the overall success, structure and future outlook of the previous 2 opponents.
Jets=bottom dwellers
Bills=1 legged man in a footrace (at least against us)
The Jets were 2-1 when they face the 49ers. They were nowhere near the top 10 ranking, but they weren't in the bottom 10. The Jets have a lot of problems, but the bottom dweller perception has been generated largely by the manner that the 49ers demolished them.
Originally posted by Oakland-Niner:Originally posted by fastforward:Originally posted by Allx9er:I guess i should have been more clear/specific when applying the term bottom dwellers as i meant it towards the overall success, structure and future outlook of the previous 2 opponents.
Jets=bottom dwellers
Bills=1 legged man in a footrace (at least against us)
The Jets were 2-1 when they face the 49ers. They were nowhere near the top 10 ranking, but they weren't in the bottom 10. The Jets have a lot of problems, but the bottom dweller perception has been generated largely by the manner that the 49ers demolished them.
Yeah, remember the Jets put up a 40 something burger week 1.
Originally posted by Memphis9er:
regressed all the way to #2
Best in the NFL
Originally posted by qnnhan7:
13.6 pts/gameBest in the NFL
Houston 14
Seattle 14
Bears 14.2
Arizona 15.6
There are some good defenses this year.
Originally posted by NCommand:
We need to get the Rams up in there to complete the NFC West sweep.
Originally posted by Method:
This year opposing teams are 5-5 in the red zone. Last year the 5th red zone td against us came in work 6. Regressed. (Per mike Sando).
And yet people would still like to talk about Alex smith.
LolOriginally posted by Memphis9er:regressed all the way to #2
Originally posted by Bryant4everYoung:
Originally posted by Memphis9er:Lol
regressed all the way to #2
I hope we keep regressing
Originally posted by SFrush:
Originally posted by Bryant4everYoung:
Originally posted by Memphis9er:Lol
regressed all the way to #2
I hope we keep regressing
This thread was ridiculous from the start. A knee jerk reaction after the Minnesota loss which was our D's only off game.