Our weakest area? | Page 5 | 49ers Webzone Forum

Sep 3, 2012 at 12:53 PM

Jiks
Member
Posts: 29,220

Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:

Originally posted by JiksJuicy:

Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
in the words of the kid Bay2Bay9erAllday...the wrath of all the proud mothers...

Good post.

didnt i tell u to get back in the kitchen...now, back on subject...qb is our weakest link...oyea

Nope I found this one to be far worse

http://www.49erswebzone.com/forum/profile/Bay2Bay9erAllday/

Sep 3, 2012 at 1:00 PM

#62

Bay2Bay9erAllday
Veteran
Posts: 10,905

Originally posted by JiksJuicy:
Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
Originally posted by JiksJuicy:
Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
in the words of the kid Bay2Bay9erAllday...the wrath of all the proud mothers...

Good post.

didnt i tell u to get back in the kitchen...now, back on subject...qb is our weakest link...oyea

Nope I found this one to be far worse

http://www.49erswebzone.com/forum/profile/Bay2Bay9erAllday/

haha...thanks for proving my point

Sep 3, 2012 at 1:04 PM

#63

Jiks
Member
Posts: 29,220

Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:

Originally posted by JiksJuicy:

Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:

Originally posted by JiksJuicy:

Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
in the words of the kid Bay2Bay9erAllday...the wrath of all the proud mothers...

Good post.

didnt i tell u to get back in the kitchen...now, back on subject...qb is our weakest link...oyea

Nope I found this one to be far worse

http://www.49erswebzone.com/forum/profile/Bay2Bay9erAllday/

haha...thanks for proving my point

You're welcome

Sep 3, 2012 at 1:06 PM

#64

Jesu80ncleats
Veteran
Posts: 2,502

Originally posted by cciowa:

Originally posted by Jesu80ncleats:
Im going with OLB, we are definitely short on depth.
it is all rumor control but if, if, we have to put a linebacker on the shelf for a while, do we have to go get another one? i know we just signed the vet from the cards but do we need another one? tough luck for those two rookies to get hurt

Idk but with Haralson out for the season, the OLB position just got a lil bit thinner (A LOT Thinner!)

Sep 3, 2012 at 1:10 PM

#65

Grinner
Member
Posts: 62

Originally posted by niners4lyfe:
fan base

Yes but, only about 30%

Pass protection, DB's and depth at OLB

Sep 3, 2012 at 2:29 PM

#66

taney71
Veteran
Posts: 15,692

Can I change my vote to olb?

Sep 3, 2012 at 2:45 PM

#67

Sanfran_chrisco
Veteran
Posts: 33,137

why the hell isnt OLB on there.......

Sep 3, 2012 at 2:48 PM

#68

susweel
Hall of Nepal
Posts: 120,278

Starting OLB'ers are solid so I dont understand how people can say OLB.

Sep 3, 2012 at 2:49 PM

#69

BrianGO
Veteran
Posts: 10,300

QB and WR is probably our "weakest area", although we are very deep at both.

We are amazingly strong at OLB, we are just razor thin. We are very solid at tackle, but pretty thin, now that we (stupidly) lost Mike Person.

Sep 3, 2012 at 2:51 PM

#70

BrianGO
Veteran
Posts: 10,300

Originally posted by susweel:
Starting OLB'ers are solid so I dont understand how people can say OLB.

I think there is some confusion about what "strong" and "weak" mean. For example, our starting OLB's are very strong, but we don't have any depth. Our WR's are relatively weak, be we have lots of depth.

Sep 3, 2012 at 2:55 PM

#71

susweel
Hall of Nepal
Posts: 120,278

Originally posted by BrianGO:

Originally posted by susweel:
Starting OLB'ers are solid so I dont understand how people can say OLB.

I think there is some confusion about what "strong" and "weak" mean. For example, our starting OLB's are very strong, but we don't have any depth. Our WR's are relatively weak, be we have lots of depth.

that is the smartest thing i've heard anyone say about anything

Sep 3, 2012 at 3:10 PM

#72

dtg_9er
Veteran
Posts: 33,204

Originally posted by susweel:

Originally posted by BrianGO:

Originally posted by susweel:
Starting OLB'ers are solid so I dont understand how people can say OLB.

I think there is some confusion about what "strong" and "weak" mean. For example, our starting OLB's are very strong, but we don't have any depth. Our WR's are relatively weak, be we have lots of depth.

that is the smartest thing i've heard anyone say about anything

Get a room!

Sep 3, 2012 at 3:16 PM

#73

BrianGO
Veteran
Posts: 10,300

Originally posted by dtg_9er:

Originally posted by susweel:

Originally posted by BrianGO:

Originally posted by susweel:
Starting OLB'ers are solid so I dont understand how people can say OLB.

I think there is some confusion about what "strong" and "weak" mean. For example, our starting OLB's are very strong, but we don't have any depth. Our WR's are relatively weak, be we have lots of depth.

that is the smartest thing i've heard anyone say about anything

Get a room!

Sep 3, 2012 at 3:18 PM

#74

MuggD
Veteran
Posts: 37,990

Originally posted by BrianGO:

Originally posted by dtg_9er:

Originally posted by susweel:

Originally posted by BrianGO:

Originally posted by susweel:
Starting OLB'ers are solid so I dont understand how people can say OLB.

I think there is some confusion about what "strong" and "weak" mean. For example, our starting OLB's are very strong, but we don't have any depth. Our WR's are relatively weak, be we have lots of depth.

that is the smartest thing i've heard anyone say about anything

Get a room!

Sep 3, 2012 at 3:28 PM

#75

JTsBiggestFan
Veteran
Posts: 7,708

I think if pass protection gets better and Smith finds his groove deep, there will be lots to worry about stopping our offense.

The big frustration watching teams like NO, GB, NYG is seeing how deep the safeties play off the line. Im jealous of that luxury!!!

Time for a change!

Remember the sting of Alvin Harper in '93 NFCC and Eddie's resolution to put an end to that?

His nephew has given Harbaalke that order and they will deliver!!