@ZBEAR
Thanks for coming on and giving your thoughts. There was a lot of good stuff in there. That said, I started skimming after you said that Finley was the most talented TE in the league. There aren't even a lot of Packers fans who think that - they don't like him because 1) he drops TONS of passes and 2) he's an overrated cocky dude and is the sort of guy who celebrates like he won the SB after catching a 5 yard pass.
I'm a 49ers fan in Packers country. Having grown up surrounded by Packers fans during a time period when the Packers have completely dominated the 49ers has been a little annoying, but easier with time and with Jim Harbaugh. Anyways, I watched all the Packers preseason games and watch them in the regular season whenever the 49ers aren't on. I do this because a) I root against them because I'm vengeful and immature and b) it gives me something to talk about with my friends, as Packers fans rarely know anything about any other team, especially anyone outside of the NFC North, and they don't like discussing other teams much, which is why the Packers never get beat by their opponent - they threw away every loss since the Favre era. Kuddos for being the exception to my anecdotal rule! Here's my breakdown:
QB: Obviously Packers by a ton. Rodgers plays like he made a deal with the devil.
WR: Packers by a lot. I would take Jennings and Nelson over any 49er WR. If you took them away, then the units might be even - if Randy Moss is at least serviceable. So yeah, let's not kid ourselves. The Packers WRs are excellent. Rodgers is great, but his WRs also help make him look that way.
TE: 49ers. VD is a beast as we all know, and he would challenge any other TE if he was in a more pass-friendly offense. He's also an elite blocker. Walker is also very good and a weapon in his own right. Finley can't block and drops too many passes. He's second tier, vastly overrated (like whatshisname from Seattle ~5-10 years ago, remember him? same guy) and takes the award as my most hated Packer. It's an illustrious award, having been won by the likes of Antonio Freeman.
OL: 49ers. The 49ers left side is probably on the level of the Packers right side. The Packers left side, particularly tackle, is not very good. Meanwhile, Davis is okay and Boone is a mystery IMO until we see him in the regular season. Goodwin>old Saturday. The Packers also have NO depth at OL and are completely screwed if anyone gets hurt.
RB: 49ers, by a lot. It's funny listening to Packers fans marvel at Cedric Benson. But you can't blame them, he's very good compared to what they've had there for many years. I can't even think of an elite RB they've had since I've been watching. The closest might be Dorsey Levens, and calling him elite is quite charitable. Meanwhile, Gore, while slowing down, excels in every facet of the game. Hunter looks like he'll have a breakout year. James is intriguing, Jacobs is legitimate. Are there any teams that can match that depth? I still don't like Dixon, but will he get many carries?
Offense overall: Packers, by a lot, assuming good health. Their passing game is stupid good and trumps everything else. Other than WR, the 49ers have more depth though. But that probably doesn't matter on Sunday. By playoff time? We'll see.
DL: 49ers, by more of a margin than most NFL fans and especially Packers fans know. It's funny that Justin Smith is getting national attention, he's been a beast for years but his impact is not media-friendly (stats and outlandish celebrations/personality; as opposed to Jared Allen for instance). I'd take him and Ray McDonald over anyone the Packers trot out there, including BJ Raji, who makes hilarious car insurance commercials but who is otherwise a bit overrated. He's good, he's not THAT good. Pickett is still decent, but was much better four years ago when he was only 55.
LB: I'm not going to insult the 49ers starting LB corps by even mentioning their names in a comparison between the 49ers and Packers. Come on now. All I'll say is Clay Matthews has fallen off a lot - he probably stopped taking steriods. Other than being a 1st round pick that Packers fans are contractually obligated to be excited about (what with their Packers "stock" that gives them "partial ownership" of the team, but doesn't come with any "property rights" or "dividends" of any sort), Nick Perry has not impressed. Maybe towards the end of the season when he's a bit seasoned he'll start making a play or two. Meanwhile, I laugh every time AJ Hawk comes up in conversation. He was going to be the next Urlacher, and the Packers picked him over VD. LOL. He wouldn't start on quite a lot of teams. I'm not sure he makes the 49ers roster, seriously. Larry Grant is definitely better by a good margin (Packers fans: consult a 49ers depth chart).
DBs: 49ers, by a lot. It was this part of the above breakdown that convinced me to write my own. The 49ers have two Pro Bowlers and the sort of depth at the cornerback position that the Packers offense is not accustomed to dealing with. Sure, the Pro Bowl invites might have been partially inspired by hype surrounding the defense as a whole, but they are strong. Tramon Williams is overrated above, I would consider taking Rodgers, Brown, AND Culliver over him. Charles Woodson is a playmaker - he's always around the ball and finds himself forcing fumbles and returning interceptions with regularity That said, he's fallen off considerably since two years ago when he was a beast. Also, I invite you watch him cover WRs on Sunday. He can't cover anyone without molesting them - he could be called for holding or PI all the freaking time, though too his credit he's a wily vet that knows how to get away with it. The big thing here though is that the Packers don't even know who will occupy the other two spots - which means they have a bunch of backups and have to decide amongst them. Don't get it twisted, while the 49ers secondary might be a TAD overrated because of the front seven they get to play behind, the Packers secondary is a considerable liability.
Defense overall: LOL
Special teams: 49ers, though I would give the Packers a modest edge in returning with Ginn out because I have PTSD in re Kyle Williams.
Coaching: Well, the homer in me thinks Harbaugh can do no wrong. If someone could find an objective way of rating head coaches, I'm sure that Mike Singletary would be one of the worst - maybe THE worst, of the last decade of more (sorry for opening old wounds). Harbaugh comes in and all of the sudden the 49ers are regularly out-gameplanning and out strategizing their opponent. Lots of people talk about how the 49ers were an anomaly last season and will fall back to earth. Yes, they probably overachieved given what we know about turnovers and injuries. But the season before, they underachieved because they were coached by [insert your own description of Mike Singletary as a head coach]. They underachieved in 2010. Anyways, I'm convinced that Harbaugh is going to win at least one Super Bowl, especially if he gets the production from the QB position that he wants, either with Smith or eventually with someone else. McCarthy, meanwhile, already has a Super Bowl and is definitely a good coach. I really want to give this to Harbaugh, I think he's better, but he hasn't really proven it while McCarthy has the ring. So I guess slight edge to the Packers. And although one game is a lousy way to compare coaches, it will be interesting to see who comes up with more clever gameplanning in this, the first game of the year. The game where you can come up with all sorts of crazy ish that the other team hasn't seen. Should be a good gauge of gameplanning at least.
Overall: ? We get to find out Sunday! I honestly think it'll come down to turnovers (as out on a limb as that prediction is) and how much Alex Smith and his new weapons have truly developed. Only with crazy turnovers will the Packers score more than 27 points. The Packers defense sucks, but can the 49ers score more than 27 points on them? They'll probably have to do so without much help in the turnover department, as Rodgers is Smith-esque in not throwing interceptions (while sprinkling in TD passes, you know, here and there). Might be able to force a Benson fumble, although I suspect he'll be two-handing it every one of the eight times they give him the ball. So to me, this is a big test for the 49ers offense as strange as that sounds.
[ Edited by mkeniner on Sep 5, 2012 at 6:58 AM ]