There are 134 users in the forums
Originally posted by WillistheWall:
Originally posted by Joecool:
Originally posted by WillistheWall:
Originally posted by spizzy:
IT doesn't say he is upset...just the opinion of the writer.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
It said he was upset after we added the guy to the futures contract, and he is most likely unhappy with this as well. That seems like atleast some mild discomfort to me. Besides, what else are we going to talk about? Can Jim Harbaugh play OLB or why isn't Peyton Manning on the 49ers?
Meh...still incorrect. Jennings is a 10-year vet. How do you know he didn't go to JH and tell him he is planning to retire after next year and to bring in someone so Jennings can help the new guy develop?
How is that incorrect though? I am just saying that's what the article said. I never said the article is correct. I can't possibly post something that wasn't reported dude. How do we know Jennings didnt shoot lightning out of his ass and make Seely mad so he wants to replace him? Same thing lol. Besides, I doubt they'd be grooming a 32 year old guy to take over for him. The guys are probably just depth though.
Originally posted by WillistheWall:The article didn't say Jennings was upset. It said that the writer thought that Jennings was upset. DON'T MAKE SOMETHING OUT OF NOTHING!
Originally posted by Joecool:
Originally posted by WillistheWall:
Originally posted by spizzy:
IT doesn't say he is upset...just the opinion of the writer.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
It said he was upset after we added the guy to the futures contract, and he is most likely unhappy with this as well. That seems like atleast some mild discomfort to me. Besides, what else are we going to talk about? Can Jim Harbaugh play OLB or why isn't Peyton Manning on the 49ers?
Meh...still incorrect. Jennings is a 10-year vet. How do you know he didn't go to JH and tell him he is planning to retire after next year and to bring in someone so Jennings can help the new guy develop?
How is that incorrect though? I am just saying that's what the article said. I never said the article is correct. I can't possibly post something that wasn't reported dude. How do we know Jennings didn't shoot lightning out of his ass and make Seely mad so he wants to replace him? Same thing lol. Besides, I doubt they'd be grooming a 32 year old guy to take over for him. The guys are probably just depth though.
Originally posted by longtime49erfan:The article didn't say Jennings was upset. It said that the writer thought that Jennings was upset. DON'T MAKE SOMETHING OUT OF NOTHING!
There is no issue here. Jennings is a 10-year man and a professional.
Quote:
Jennings is signed through 2014 and is scheduled to make $875,000 in base slary in 2012. Jennings was not happy when he learned the 49ers signed Nelson.
Originally posted by spizzy:
Seriously doe, Jennings has been flawless and long snappers never have competition. WHATS JIMS DEAL
Originally posted by ImaMod:
Originally posted by longtime49erfan:
The article didn't say Jennings was upset. It said that the writer thought that Jennings was upset. DON'T MAKE SOMETHING OUT OF NOTHING!
There is no issue here. Jennings is a 10-year man and a professional.
lol
The title of this thread is "Jennings unhappy with additions of long snappers"
The article says:
Quote:
Jennings is signed through 2014 and is scheduled to make $875,000 in base slary in 2012. Jennings was not happy when he learned the 49ers signed Nelson.
Nelson is a longsnapper
Not happy = unhappy
He didn't "make something out of nothing"
Originally posted by DaDivaRecieva15:
They can't compete with this