Originally posted by cciowa:
they had no idea what players development was. erickson was just trying to stay alive, nolan was in over his head and sing was a clueless drama queen. i was so dumb. i supported erickson in his second year cuz he had his own coaches and i loved the nolan hire cuz I am old school and liked his dad i was banned at the time but was 100 per cent against the sing hire, at least i got one of em right. It took me five or six games to figure out this team was for real this year cuz I was used to bad coaching and could not believe a new coach could make such a difference
LOL, sounds familiar to me. I supported Erickson because Walsh endorsed him. But the team seemed out of control so was glad Nolan came in as he was well organized. I also remembered his father and he was one of the best coaches in SF until Walsh. Nolan did a good job bringing in high character guys and putting the organization together but he was clueless about offense and didn't seem to be able to command much loyalty. When you ridicule players that happens.
Then Singletary was made asst. HC under Nolan with almost no coaching experience...argh!
Now the coaches are in sync with each other and teaching is the name of the game! Hooray!