28.7
What?
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/7050004/nfl-week-4-total-qbr-leaders
Again, What?
There are 259 users in the forums
Alex Smith's QBR (ESPN stat) for the Philly game?
Oct 3, 2011 at 9:10 AM
- Method
- Veteran
- Posts: 9,709
Oct 3, 2011 at 9:12 AM
- NickV
- Veteran
- Posts: 13,574
ESPN
Oct 3, 2011 at 9:12 AM
- unst4bl3
- Member
- Posts: 7,568
told you that stat was lame as hell.
Oct 3, 2011 at 9:13 AM
- valrod33
- Hall of Small
- Posts: 137,970
That rating system really doesnt like it when you get sacked
Oct 3, 2011 at 9:13 AM
- 49ersalldaway126
- Veteran
- Posts: 14,549
Ya I usually update it week by week ut not gonna do that this week
This proves that stat is meaningless
I hope sand gives an explanation why it's so low
I don't see how 65% comp 2 TD 0INT 270 yards and a 20 point comeback win can get you a low rating
This proves that stat is meaningless
I hope sand gives an explanation why it's so low
I don't see how 65% comp 2 TD 0INT 270 yards and a 20 point comeback win can get you a low rating
Oct 3, 2011 at 9:13 AM
- 49AllTheTime
- Veteran
- Posts: 66,661
Didn't ESPN, lol
Oct 3, 2011 at 9:14 AM
- Nuns
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,301
Fumble and sacks? Doesn't make much sense though. No picks and two TD's
Oct 3, 2011 at 9:14 AM
- Method
- Veteran
- Posts: 9,709
22/32 273y 3td 3int (1 pick 6) 26pt loss= 77.9 (kyle orton)
22/33 291y 2td 0int 1pt win= 28.7
Really ESPN? lol
22/33 291y 2td 0int 1pt win= 28.7
Really ESPN? lol
[ Edited by Method on Oct 3, 2011 at 9:15 AM ]
Oct 3, 2011 at 9:15 AM
- valrod33
- Hall of Small
- Posts: 137,970
Originally posted by 49ersalldaway126:
Ya I usually update it week by week ut not gonna do that this week
This proves that stat is meaningless
I hope sand gives an explanation why it's so low
I don't see how 65% comp 2 TD 0INT 270 yards and a 20 point comeback win can get you a low rating
http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/47325/qbr-ranks-parsing-alex-smiths-showing
Oct 3, 2011 at 9:15 AM
- HessianDud
- Veteran
- Posts: 22,995
the two fumbles and 3 sacks take a huge hit out of his numbers.
stats are incredibly useful, but obviously anyone who watched the game knows that that doesn't reflect what happened in the game.
stats are incredibly useful, but obviously anyone who watched the game knows that that doesn't reflect what happened in the game.
Oct 3, 2011 at 9:15 AM
- mod
- Veteran
- Posts: 41,090
Ok... I'm going back to the old QBR system... Alex had a lower QB rating than Romo? the guy that gave the game away?
This was Alex's best game this year, and possible in his entire career. He carried most of the team... (not all, Gore deserves some credit)
This was Alex's best game this year, and possible in his entire career. He carried most of the team... (not all, Gore deserves some credit)
Oct 3, 2011 at 9:39 AM
- Shemp
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 29,122
He had a lame first half, an outstanding 3rd quarter, and a solid 4th quarter. that does seem way too low though. Conversely, the traditional rating has put him way too high this year. Smith has found the loophole in the traditional QB rating stat: do very short high % dump offs and you'll jack up the rating. That's not his intent, but that has been the result however.
Oct 3, 2011 at 9:42 AM
- Whomeam
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,371
Does it count the multiple drops in the first half? because this is just ridiculous.
Oct 3, 2011 at 9:42 AM
- ghostrider
- Veteran
- Posts: 8,671
Originally posted by valrod33:
That rating system really doesnt like it when you get sacked
This. Dang.
Oct 3, 2011 at 9:43 AM
- crabman82
- Veteran
- Posts: 16,992
everyone knows this stat sucks, the lame part is the espn employess like mike golic who have to promote the stat as a good one cus their employer created it