There are 69 users in the forums

Remember
Not a member? Register Now!

This is getting old real quick

ive seen it a couple times in some different threads and im sick of seeing people actually suggesting trade Willis for a freakin better draft pick to get Luck. its a terrible idea to get rid of a sure All-pro player and our best Defensive player by a large margin for a f**kin rookie.
there are smarter ways to to get a (potentially) good QB on this team w/o getting rid of the best thing we've got goin for us.
Willis is great but 3-4 ILBs just shouldn't be a high priority, it's reality. Of course we aren't trading Willis, but you have to understand priority. If losing Willis meant we get a franchise QB, you do it without blinking.

[ Edited by binary2nd on Dec 30, 2010 at 18:37:37 ]
Originally posted by binary2nd:
Willis is great but 3-4 ILBs just shouldn't be a high priority, it's reality.

  • BobS
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 7,889
This team has lot's of needs, a franchise QB is a high priority.
Besides, he has a cast on his hand.
Originally posted by binary2nd:
Willis is great but 3-4 ILBs just shouldn't be a high priority, it's reality. Of course we aren't trading Willis, but you have to understand priority. If losing Willis meant we get a franchise QB, you do it without blinking.

im not saying i dont want a Franchise QB. im saying dont risk the best overall player you have for an unknown. sure maybe Luck will turn out great and be a HOF QB. then again maybe we traded willis to get him now our defense sucks and Luck is a complete bust.
f*kk patrick willis.
Originally posted by binary2nd:
f*kk patrick willis.

f**k you.
Originally posted by binary2nd:
Willis is great but 3-4 ILBs just shouldn't be a high priority, it's reality. Of course we aren't trading Willis, but you have to understand priority. If losing Willis meant we get a franchise QB, you do it without blinking.
Why do you care? It's not happening.
we have had patrick willis for 4 years and our defense is still not that good.

He is a very good player--but his position is not a franchise changer.
Originally posted by sfninerfanMax:
we have had patrick willis for 4 years and our defense is still not that good.

He is a very good player--but his position is not a franchise changer.

Yeah it is. If you take him out, our middle of the pack D automatically becomes a bottom 5 one. No need to risk trading a future HOF for a potential bust.
Originally posted by niner4life21:
Originally posted by sfninerfanMax:
we have had patrick willis for 4 years and our defense is still not that good.

He is a very good player--but his position is not a franchise changer.

Yeah it is. If you take him out, our middle of the pack D automatically becomes a bottom 5 one. No need to risk trading a future HOF for a potential bust.

Until we get a good QB the Niners will remain a bust---since 2002 we have been a bust--and if we don't get a QB---we remain a bust.

I would do it---but I doubt the real GM will do it--so don't worry!!
sorry no way you trade the best ILB for a chance at Luck or someone else, when we dont know if they are the savior or gonna be better than what we had.