Originally posted by darkknight49:Originally posted by binary2nd:Originally posted by darkknight49:
This doesn't make that much sense. If you can evaluate talent, you can evaluate talent. Just because Baalke is from the Parcells lineage doesn't mean he is incapable of evaluating wco talent. It's a silly argument.
It makes a ton of sense when you include philosophy into that equation. Some systems are built around the QB, others are built around D, running game, etc. For instance, you might be able to evaluate talent, but if your philosophy is to pound up the middle ever 1st and 2nd down................you would draft 2 olinemen. Don't be naive.
So a good talent evaluator can only find good players for a specific system? That makes him worthless long term to an organization. I stand by my statement : weak ass argument.
Only if you're simpleminded and naive. A good talent evaluator will find good players for HIS system, every decision they make will reflect what THEY feel is a recipe for success. The question is, is that type of system effective in today's NFL, better yet, does it match the talent and identity of the franchise? We've tried a conservative, defensive philosophy here for 8 years, all you have to do is look at the results. This is a franchise founded on QB-friendly systems that are aggressive and progressive on Offense; this is also what a majority of the good teams in today's league have adopted. You can claim that it's not an issue as long as you can evaluate talent yada yada yada, but you are just being naive thinking like that. With philosophy comes how you prioritize talent.
[ Edited by binary2nd on Dec 30, 2010 at 18:34:48 ]
