There are 177 users in the forums

Remember
Not a member? Register Now!

Post Game Analysis (at St. Louis Rams)

  • Nes49
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 5,350
Originally posted by ZRF80:
Knowing Alex, he wouldve ended up throwing the ball away anyways in that last second. Cant risk a turnover, remember ?


Not a bad thing......
Originally posted by boriken_9er:
Originally posted by KRS-1:
It was ruled that Ginn did not get OOB I believe.

That was the ruling, but he obviously did.

Yes, he did get out of bounds with 1 second left on the clock, but he was down by contact before he was out of bounds. Thus the clock kept running.
Originally posted by Gavintech:
Originally posted by boriken_9er:
Originally posted by KRS-1:
It was ruled that Ginn did not get OOB I believe.

That was the ruling, but he obviously did.

Yes, he did get out of bounds with 1 second left on the clock, but he was down by contact before he was out of bounds. Thus the clock kept running.

"down by contact" is the most vague explanation that a ref can give.
Originally posted by itlynstalyn:
Originally posted by RonMexico:
Originally posted by itlynstalyn:
Still wasn't PI.

...

yes..it was, he ran into the WR without looking back, that's pretty much the definition of PI

stop defending ignorant bulls**t, Clements sucks

No doubt he sucks but the WR was nowhere near the ball and he wouldn't have made a play on it regardless.


OH KINDA LIKE THE BS PI WE LOSS IN THE 1ST MATCH IN OT?
Originally posted by Sjack39:
Originally posted by itlynstalyn:
Originally posted by RonMexico:
Originally posted by itlynstalyn:
Still wasn't PI.

...

yes..it was, he ran into the WR without looking back, that's pretty much the definition of PI

stop defending ignorant bulls**t, Clements sucks

No doubt he sucks but the WR was nowhere near the ball and he wouldn't have made a play on it regardless.


OH KINDA LIKE THE BS PI WE LOSS IN THE 1ST MATCH IN OT?

your DB prevented our receiver from making a play on the ball. Your WR didn't even have a chance at making a play on the ball because it was so underthrown.
Originally posted by backontop:
Originally posted by Sjack39:
Originally posted by itlynstalyn:
Originally posted by RonMexico:
Originally posted by itlynstalyn:
Still wasn't PI.

...

yes..it was, he ran into the WR without looking back, that's pretty much the definition of PI

stop defending ignorant bulls**t, Clements sucks

No doubt he sucks but the WR was nowhere near the ball and he wouldn't have made a play on it regardless.


OH KINDA LIKE THE BS PI WE LOSS IN THE 1ST MATCH IN OT?

your DB prevented our receiver from making a play on the ball. Your WR didn't even have a chance at making a play on the ball because it was so underthrown.

Troy smith threw a prayer into middle of the field... delaney* was running a post... he stops when he sees the ball so badly thrown and tries to change direction and he runs into atowge. It should of been incidental contact if anything at all because delaney* had no shot to catch that at all and he initiated the contact and it was VERY uncatchable . and the ball amendola was under thrown but alexander was comming back to the ball untill clements ran right directly into him.

http://img716.imageshack.us/img716/3113/1stquartermp4snapshot05.jpg

Clements running into alexander where he is still in position for the ball
http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/3113/1stquartermp4snapshot05.jpg

After the fact when clements knockd him all the way into the endzone
http://img808.imageshack.us/i/1stquartermp4snapshot05.jpg/