Originally posted by GoGiantsHumBaby:
Originally posted by McLovin:
Originally posted by GoGiantsHumBaby:
Although no analysis from McLovin himself.
The analysis is in the article. Same s**t I have been saying for years.
Right, that's my point. You lean on a columnist who's expertise is basketball for your football analysis. You can't come up with your own.
Many of us have been saying what Kawakami just said in that article for several years - long before he ever wrote it, obviously. Susweel, I believe, was among us. How exactly does that mean he needs to lean on a columnist? It's been said before, just not by a columnist - until now. It really doesn't matter where Kawakami's expertise lies because he's been right about the 49ers for years. People hated on him for all those years because he saw the reality of the situation and wrote about it, while they just wanted to read the optimistic views. Kawakami was consistently among the most hated writers on this forum due to the things he's said, but those things have turned out to be as accurate as it gets. I am one of the few who has been saying this about him from the beginning.
You hate him because he's not writing with his homer goggles on, which is what you want.
[ Edited by 49erRider on Dec 7, 2010 at 11:00 PM ]