Originally posted by Ether:
Originally posted by crzy:
Originally posted by Ether:
Originally posted by crzy:
Originally posted by Twister68:
Originally posted by crzy:
Originally posted by Twister68:
Originally posted by crzy:
I don't necessarily want my quarterback to throw for 300 yards. That's not always going to lead to a win.
I want my quarterback to be talented enough to able to throw for 300 yards if he wants to.
Does that make sense?
After reading your posts I'd say this: No, it doesn't make sense, you're are just searching fuel to maintain your status as a childish hater.
I don't know who you are. But labeling someone as a hater instead of attacking my argument is a cop-out....and won't help you build any credibility around here.
Well, I'm not sure if you are the right person to talk about credibility around here. Or do you really think you can build some by starting threads like "We should have paid Crabtree what he demanded in July " or "We need to replace Joe Nedney "?
You have a hard time detecting sarcasm, which is what the Nedney thread was. It was a parody of all the Ninertalk panic after the Falcons loss.
And we absolutely SHOULD have paid Michael Crabtree in July. If we had him earlier, he would have produced earlier, which could have led to more wins. Crabtree's holdout might keep us out of the playoffs.
If you believe he would have helped our defense prevent Brett Favre's miracle pass and the Falcons destroying our defense, then you are delusional.
Does Michael Crabtree play defense smart guy? No he doesn't.
He would have helped out our offensive woes in the first five games which could easily have led to more wins.
You absolutely missed the point of my post, so let me try again.
Our team was 3-2 at the time of Michael Crabtree's signing.
In our first loss, the Vikings won on a miracle last second play. Our offense was fine as it scored 21 points. In the second game, our defense gave up 41 points. If you think Crabtree would have helped our offense make up 31 points, then yes, you are delusional.
The San Francisco 49ers were 0/11 on third down against the Minnesota Vikings in Week 3.
ZERO FOR ELEVEN!. If you don't think Michael Crabtree would have helped us convert some of those third downs which could have led to a victory in a game we barely lost.....then I don't really know what to say to you.
And if you watched the Atlanta game, you'd know that 45-10 doesn't even begin to tell the entire story. Our offense woes in the Atlanta game again put our defense in precarious situations. The game was 14-10 with 9 minutes left in the 2nd quarter, and the Falcons turned over the football. The 49ers had 33 yards to go to get into the end zone. Instead, we went 3 and out and got sacked out of Nedney's field goal range. From that moment on the game was lost. With our defense staying on the field for almost 37 minutes, the Falcons wore them down, our D gave up big plays and we lost.
And imagine if Crabtree had been here in training camp. He probably has a bigger impact in the games that he HAS played in this season after fully grasping the 49er offense. Maybe he doesn't drop endzone touchdowns.
I stand by my point. Not signing Michael Crabtree on time might cost the 49ers the playoffs.