Power Rankings week 5

`12th by ESPN
http://espn.go.com/nfl/powerrankings?year=2009&week=5

Originally posted by Mustangstud49:
not a NOOB just a new name.

old one was banned, huh.

Originally posted by valrod33:
`12th by ESPN
http://espn.go.com/nfl/powerrankings?year=2009&week=5

i really dont see how ESPN has us behind the Bengals..

sure they are one miraculous play from being 4-0, just like us...

but they are also 3 final drive comeback's away from being 0-4, and they needed overtime to beat the browns, while we shut out the rams convincingly...

ESPN continues the niner hate..

[ Edited by MaliCali on Oct 6, 2009 at 11:17:11 ]

Originally posted by MaliCali:

Originally posted by valrod33:
`12th by ESPN
http://espn.go.com/nfl/powerrankings?year=2009&week=5

i really dont see how ESPN has us behind the Bengals..

sure they are one miraculous play from being 4-0, just like us...

but they are also 3 final drive comeback's away from being 0-4, and they needed overtime to beat the browns, while we shut out the rams convincingly...

ESPN continues the niner hate..

I think the Bengals are for real im not mad at them ranking them ahead of us

Vikings are #3? Shouldn't we be like #4 then?

[ Edited by blunt_probe on Oct 6, 2009 at 11:25:38 ]

Originally posted by blunt_probe:
Vikings are #3? Shouldn't we be like #4 then?

Come now, just uttering 'his' name gives them a 5 - 10 slot boost.

Originally posted by valrod33:

Originally posted by MaliCali:

Originally posted by valrod33:
`12th by ESPN
http://espn.go.com/nfl/powerrankings?year=2009&week=5

i really dont see how ESPN has us behind the Bengals..

sure they are one miraculous play from being 4-0, just like us...

but they are also 3 final drive comeback's away from being 0-4, and they needed overtime to beat the browns, while we shut out the rams convincingly...

ESPN continues the niner hate..

I think the Bengals are for real im not mad at them ranking them ahead of us

again, barely beating the browns without jamaal lewis, with a side of quarterback trouble's, simply does not impress me..

[ Edited by MaliCali on Oct 6, 2009 at 11:28:23 ]

Originally posted by blunt_probe:
Vikings are #3? Shouldn't we be like #4 then?

I wonder if we would be #3 if we had beat the Vikes. Probably not.

Originally posted by DJD:

Originally posted by blunt_probe:
Vikings are #3? Shouldn't we be like #4 then?

Come now, just uttering 'his' name gives them a 5 - 10 slot boost.

Of course, what was I thinking?

[ Edited by blunt_probe on Oct 6, 2009 at 11:30:31 ]

Originally posted by Overkill:

Originally posted by blunt_probe:
Vikings are #3? Shouldn't we be like #4 then?

I wonder if we would be #3 if we had beat the Vikes. Probably not.

Nope, I bet we would still be right about where we are. Maybe one spot higher if that.

Originally posted by MaliCali:

Originally posted by valrod33:

Originally posted by MaliCali:

Originally posted by valrod33:
`12th by ESPN
http://espn.go.com/nfl/powerrankings?year=2009&week=5

i really dont see how ESPN has us behind the Bengals..

sure they are one miraculous play from being 4-0, just like us...

but they are also 3 final drive comeback's away from being 0-4, and they needed overtime to beat the browns, while we shut out the rams convincingly...

ESPN continues the niner hate..

I think the Bengals are for real im not mad at them ranking them ahead of us

again, barely beating the browns without jamaal lewis, with a side of quarterback trouble's, simply does not impress me..

what about them beating the steelers who also crushed the chargers

Originally posted by valrod33:

Originally posted by MaliCali:

Originally posted by valrod33:

Originally posted by MaliCali:

Originally posted by valrod33:
`12th by ESPN
http://espn.go.com/nfl/powerrankings?year=2009&week=5

i really dont see how ESPN has us behind the Bengals..

sure they are one miraculous play from being 4-0, just like us...

but they are also 3 final drive comeback's away from being 0-4, and they needed overtime to beat the browns, while we shut out the rams convincingly...

ESPN continues the niner hate..

I think the Bengals are for real im not mad at them ranking them ahead of us

again, barely beating the browns without jamaal lewis, with a side of quarterback trouble's, simply does not impress me..

what about them beating the steelers who also crushed the chargers

steelers had them beat, and weren't playing how they normally do...

and the chargers aren't that impressive right now either, their defense is being made look silly, jamarcus russell played quite well against them...

cinci beats up on an ailing pittsburgh at home who beats up on an ailing san diego at home...your argument isnt very convincing, just like the Bengals record..

lmao


6. If you missed any of ESPN's analysis, here's what it sounded like:

"Brett Favre OMG OMG Brett Favre Brett Favre Brett Favre OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG Brett Favre OMG OMG Brett Favre Brett Favre OMG OMG OMG Wildcat Brett Favre OMG OMG OMG Brett Favre beat all 32 teams Brett Favre Tim Tebow Brett Favre OMG Brett Favre OMG 40's the next 20 Brett Favre OMG OMG Brett Favre Brett Favre."

what a turd

Originally posted by DJD:

Originally posted by blunt_probe:
Vikings are #3? Shouldn't we be like #4 then?

Come now, just uttering 'his' name gives them a 5 - 10 slot boost.

HE WHO MUST NOT BE NAMED