Originally posted by Sugatis:Originally posted by Kolohe:Originally posted by Ceadderman:Originally posted by SJniner7:Originally posted by Ceadderman:Originally posted by ninerfan818:Originally posted by Ceadderman:Originally posted by DaveWilcox:Originally posted by Kolohe:Originally posted by DaveWilcox:
I think it is Hill... he looks like he is tossing a hand grenade, rather then stepping into the throw and drilling it to the WR..
In order for Hill to lead a receiver, he has to throw the ball before they break the huddle.
This:
Smith to Gilmore for 75 yards
Compared to this:
Shaun Hill to Isaac Brue for 50 yards
Now tell me, which receiver catches his pass in-stride??
touche!! Both should have been touchdowns. Too much air in both throws....Hmmm... I wonder if that would happen to Nate Davis..
Hafta say that Hill's pass was better. Only cause it was over Bruce's shoulder.
Now show me an example of Hill throwing a longer pass in comparison to Smith's long yardage throws. I think that the crevice will get much wider in terms of capability.
~Ceadder
...and Smith's are also much wider in probability that it would even be on target
Dude, what do you want from me? I gave Hill credit. I called it straight up even.
If you want me to service him, well you better lend me your golden knee pads. Cause my knees are trashed..
I like how Smith "Is never on target" as inferred by you and others. That is a load of crap n you know it.
If you can't call it straight then how can you expect ANYONE to take you seriously? Oh wait I forgot, this is the Shaun Hill gang I'm talkin about. You guys think that everyone takes you seriously just because you hate Smith.
I remember when people did that back when Joe and Steve were competing against each other. Funny how no matter how much things change they still remain the same. Why does there have to be a division on this anyway. Can't people be civil about this issue? You don't see ME going out and flaming anyone who is a 49er do you? Of course you don't cause I won't do that.
I may not believe 100% in the guy, but it's cause I know what he is. Even if you disagree with me. That's not going to change until he proves to me that I'm wrong. Case in point. We SHOULD have won today. 1 scoring drive by Hill the ENTIRE game? Man if that was Alex, you guys would be going ape$h|t about it.
But oh well it's not Alex so you're happy with mediocrity.
~Ceadder
Hey, we not all haters, i Just feel Hill gives us the best chance to win. I was waiting for the bashing ceadder, but I noticed you refrained... heh!
And for the moment I don't feel that he gives us anything more that either Alex or Nate can give us. Seriously, if all we want is a custodial QB then all 3 qualify perfectly. I'm pretty sure that all 3 can hand the ball off to a RB. They would NEVER have made the Pros if they couldn't do that.
So really what does Hill bring to the table that is so much better than the other two? Cause I'm not seeing it and I would LOVE to be enlightened.
~Ceadder
Poise in the pocket and overall a much better passer, well at least over Smith.
Hill has no pocket prescense and no down field accuracy - which is fine if you can control the ball better - the offense can NOT leave the Defense out on the field week in and week out like they have been - Shaun Hill and Raye have got to do a better job of mixing the plays up and getting the Def off balance...
Wow, then what was that a few hours ago?? I could've sworn Hill drove the ball 80 yards for a TD pass to Davis. How about in week 1, another 80 yard drive. All done with no running game might I add.