There are many 49er fans posting after today's win against Seattle about their disappointment in the offense. Some think Shaun Hill is barely getting us by. Some think Jimmy Raye should put more faith in Hill and let him throw more. Some just want bigger and better stats.
The thing I think a lot of fans are forgetting is how important ball security and time of possession is in this sport and to this team. Compared to last season, the 49ers are eating up much more clock by taking care of the ball and running more often than they pass. The 49ers are playing to their strengths on offense and not asking Shaun Hill to carry the team when he really doesn't need to.
My case in point... go back and watch the Patriots @ 49ers highlight from 2008.
LINKAGE.
Now, this will require you to watch JTO again, but stay with me here. In that game, the Patriots knew the 49ers could potentially out-score them quickly... the Niners even put up 14 points in the first ten minutes alone. But then two things happened.
#1 - One coach did not value T.O.P. and ball security... that coach being Mike Martz. Instead of putting the game in Frank Gore's hands when the 49ers had the lead, he trusted JTO to carry the 49ers and continued to pass. Turnovers then happened, and the 49ers barely had the ball in the second half. Bad decision.
#2 - The other coach highly valued T.O.P... that coach being Bill "Darth Hoodie" Bellichick/cheat. Billy Boy dinked and dunked us with short passes and runs for the rest of the game and refused to have Cassell throw the long ball in the second half. He was careful with the football and milked the clock. Good decision.
I only bring this up because I feel the 49ers are playing extremely SMART football this season. In week one, the 49ers could not get the running game going against Arizona, but they stuck to it even on 3rd and 8's and 9's. Why? Because Singletary knew (just like Bellichick did last year with Martz/JTO) that Arizona had the potential to score points quickly. If the 49ers could in any way limit the amount of possessions Arizona had in the game, that would be to their advantage... and it played a huge part in SF's win.
So for those of you that want Jimmy Raye to have Shaun Hill put on an offensive show, can I ask you why? Seriously, why force Hill to pass more often when he really doesn't have to? It's the same reason the Vikings are not asking Brett Favre to win their games for them with his arm- they don't NEED him to. They have running backs and a defense that carry their team, kind of like the 49ers (yes I know AP is the best back in the league, but the logic still works out).
So until the NEED arrives, and the time in the game comes for Shaun Hill to put the team on his back, why risk passing a ton when the strength of this club is in controlling the time of possession with the running game? We all know Hill is capable of such things (see the Jets game from 2008), but there's no reason to force it when it is smarter and safer to win with hard running and good defense.
[ Edited by NickSh49 on Sep 21, 2009 at 2:14 AM ]