So why isn't the team credited with 5 sacks?

Sep 13, 2009 at 7:18 PM

ziggy_gonna_rock
Veteran
Posts: 1,758

Mcdonald -1
Haralson -2
smith - 2

Smith is credited with 1 . He had a sack on a 4th down play and at the end of game .

Haralson got Warner early on a bootleg type play . Why are they not credited for 2 sacks each ????

Sep 13, 2009 at 7:19 PM

PatrickWillis52
Veteran
Posts: 943

Sep 13, 2009 at 7:19 PM

HoneyBadger49er
Veteran
Posts: 19,054

Obama

Sep 13, 2009 at 7:22 PM

cubanb
Veteran
Posts: 1,971

Originally posted by King49er:
Obama

Sep 13, 2009 at 9:05 PM

9ermex
Veteran
Posts: 1,018

I think the last play was a fumble, and the 4th down play Warner just threw the ball away, he should have been penalized.

Too bad but at least we were in Warners face all day lets hope we can keep this up.

go niners!

Sep 13, 2009 at 9:10 PM

niners94
Veteran
Posts: 12,043

Does it matter? Warner was getting abused all day.

Sep 13, 2009 at 9:11 PM

AB81Rules
Veteran
Posts: 32,821

Originally posted by 9ermex:
I think the last play was a fumble, and the 4th down play Warner just threw the ball away, he should have been penalized.

Too bad but at least we were in Warners face all day lets hope we can keep this up.

go niners!

no he's right, on a fumble like that, where the defnder takes down the QB, and makes him fumble is also considered a Sack.

Sep 13, 2009 at 9:13 PM

IWASATTHECATCH
Hall of Fame
Posts: 21,931

Originally posted by ziggy_gonna_rock:
Mcdonald -1
Haralson -2
smith - 2

Smith is credited with 1 . He had a sack on a 4th down play and at the end of game .

Haralson got Warner early on a bootleg type play . Why are they not credited for 2 sacks each ????

On that one play, Warner tried to hand off to Wells but Benie went the wrong way, so Warner tried to run, and it was for a loss. Thus that play was ruled as a run, not QB sack. Unfortunately. I would have preferred a sack, too.

EDIT: And I'm not referring to the last play on D. This was earlier in the game, when Benie would have had his 1st NFL carry but blew the direction.

[ Edited by IWASATTHECATCH on Sep 13, 2009 at 21:14:40 ]

Sep 13, 2009 at 9:16 PM

crzy
Hall of Fame
Posts: 40,285

Because they didn't get 5 sacks.

Sep 13, 2009 at 9:17 PM

#10

global_nomad
Veteran
Posts: 14,827

The play J Smith got to Warner on 4th down before they got the ball back one more time he didn't sack him. Warner threw the ball away when he was going down so that wasn't a sick but it was a major pressure and take down.

Sep 13, 2009 at 9:18 PM

#11

AKfanster
Veteran
Posts: 2,827

Originally posted by AB83Rules:
Originally posted by 9ermex:
I think the last play was a fumble, and the 4th down play Warner just threw the ball away, he should have been penalized.

Too bad but at least we were in Warners face all day lets hope we can keep this up.

go niners!

no he's right, on a fumble like that, where the defnder takes down the QB, and makes him fumble is also considered a Sack.

Can't the team appeal the stat ruling and get it changed????

Sep 13, 2009 at 9:22 PM

#12

HoneyBadger49er
Veteran
Posts: 19,054

Originally posted by AKfanster:
Originally posted by AB83Rules:
Originally posted by 9ermex:
I think the last play was a fumble, and the 4th down play Warner just threw the ball away, he should have been penalized.

Too bad but at least we were in Warners face all day lets hope we can keep this up.

go niners!

no he's right, on a fumble like that, where the defnder takes down the QB, and makes him fumble is also considered a Sack.

Can't the team appeal the stat ruling and get it changed????

something like that, I'm not exactly sure how it works

Sep 13, 2009 at 9:24 PM

#13