Originally posted by Ceadderman:Originally posted by bigmike55:Originally posted by Ceadderman:Originally posted by bigmike55:Originally posted by Memphis9er:
Yeah let's throw a rookie QB in there not ready to go because it worked so well last time. Seriously, you guys are so far beyond whack it is not even funny anymore, it is just plain pathetic. But I digress...please feel free to continue with the knee jerk reactionary rhetoric.
Naming Nate Davis as the backup QB is throwing him in??? I didn't know holding a clipboard and listening to plays through the headset on the sidelines was throwing someone in. ?????
YES it IS throwing him in. Look at last year and the year before that. How many injuries did Hill sustain in that 2 year period? It's not a question of IF Hill is injured. It's a question of when and if he'll be able to play. If not your choice of QB2 takes the next game or hell may even take over if Hill is knocked out of the game.
Freakin Einstein we got here folks.
And if that were the scenario, Alex Smith would do SOoOoOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooOOOOo much better.
Okay BM, I will DARE you to find one article where Hill was just so much better than Smith that it necessitated giving him QB1.
If you can, then I will back off this ignorant opinion that Davis will outplay Smith against 1st and 2nd teamers.
Cause to be honest playing against scrubs fighting for a roster spot is not even close in level of competition.
i am a smith guy, but i think davis might be able to outplay him. based on his poise. second if he can outplay smith, he can outplay hill also. based on hill is still a waste of our time just getting us by and no better than smith. at least smith would make the d's not stack the box as much....