Originally posted by MarkD:If its a Bryant Young (YES) then draft high. If its a Suh then (HELL NO)
If a Suh like talent made it to our pick I would jizz continuously for hours.
There are 292 users in the forums
Originally posted by MarkD:If its a Bryant Young (YES) then draft high. If its a Suh then (HELL NO)
Originally posted by 49ersMyLife:
Yeup and imagine if we had a good NT next to Justin. Power RBs are running inside on us pretty effectively - and we don't want a NT? To me, it makes no sense at all. The way we have really dominated pass first team is by making them pass-only teams. If we stop the run against Seattle and Rams - they have no chance.
Originally posted by eonblue:
Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:
Not necessarily skeptical about if, but I would rather re-sign one of our vets (Ice or RJF) to a 3 or 4 year deal. Then behind the veteran, develop Ian Williams, Tony Jerrod-Eddie (possibly) and/or a rookie prospect like Larry Black Jr. that we could get in the later rounds. Just not convinced you can throw in a rookie NT (no matter how big, strong and talented) on this team and in this scheme and have them be successful.
Whoever got thrown in he would be to the same effect as Sopo with youth and upside.
Originally posted by eonblue:
Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:
Not necessarily skeptical about if, but I would rather re-sign one of our vets (Ice or RJF) to a 3 or 4 year deal. Then behind the veteran, develop Ian Williams, Tony Jerrod-Eddie (possibly) and/or a rookie prospect like Larry Black Jr. that we could get in the later rounds. Just not convinced you can throw in a rookie NT (no matter how big, strong and talented) on this team and in this scheme and have them be successful.
Whoever got thrown in he would be to the same effect as Sopo with youth and upside.
Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:
you're greatly underestimating how long it takes most NTs to REALLY learn how to play the position. Soap didn't become effective until about year 4 or 5 and even RJF is relatively unproven, and he's a 4 year vet. But hey, you could be right...we'll see if they go with a rookie or bring back Soap, RJF or both.
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Ultimately I'd like to see Soap brought back, but I don't know if this year was an anomaly or if he's regressing overall. I feel that too many way overlook the NT position and underrate its importance in a 3-4 scheme.
Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:
you're greatly underestimating how long it takes most NTs to REALLY learn how to play the position. Soap didn't become effective until about year 4 or 5 and even RJF is relatively unproven, and he's a 4 year vet. But hey, you could be right...we'll see if they go with a rookie or bring back Soap, RJF or both.
Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:
you're greatly underestimating how long it takes most NTs to REALLY learn how to play the position. Soap didn't become effective until about year 4 or 5 and even RJF is relatively unproven, and he's a 4 year vet. But hey, you could be right...we'll see if they go with a rookie or bring back Soap, RJF or both.
Originally posted by LasVegasWally:
Agree Phoenix.
We DEFINITELY need a NT. Do we trade up to get the best one we can and if "Yes" how far up?
Originally posted by Elric:
well before we get all fired up to draft someone maybe we should look at what we have first!
Tukuafu, WillDTACT 6'4"2931/3/19842Oregon
Dobbs, DemarcusTERES 6'2"28211/30/19872Georgia
Jerod-Eddie, TonyDEACT 6'5"3013/29/19900Texas A&M
I'd say outstanding!