Quick Search:

There are 99 users in the forums

Remember
Not a member? Register Now!

What do the 9ers need to give up to draft Fleener?

Apr 23, 2012 at 10:28:37
#31
Originally posted by English:
All right calm down. Any more comments like "get a life" get a warning.

Clear?

How about accusing me of stealing quotes? Going to say anything about that?
Apr 23, 2012 at 10:30:05
#32
And back to the subject, two firsts and a third for a tight end?

We already have Davies. Another would be nice. But this is just way too much.
Apr 23, 2012 at 10:32:55
#33
Originally posted by English:
And back to the subject, two firsts and a third for a tight end?

We already have Davies. Another would be nice. But this is just way too much.

way to objectively moderate
Apr 23, 2012 at 10:37:54
#34
Originally posted by DirtyP:
Originally posted by English:
All right calm down. Any more comments like "get a life" get a warning.

Clear?

How about accusing me of stealing quotes? Going to say anything about that?

The comment about calm down was aimed at you both. And I strongly recommend you do so right now.
Apr 23, 2012 at 10:39:47
#35
Originally posted by DirtyP:
Originally posted by English:
And back to the subject, two firsts and a third for a tight end?

We already have Davies. Another would be nice. But this is just way too much.

way to objectively moderate

Obviously you have no idea what a moderator does.
Apr 23, 2012 at 10:41:37
#36
Originally posted by English:
Obviously you have no idea what a moderator does.

I guess not
Apr 23, 2012 at 10:41:48
#37
I don't mind drafting Fleener at 30. But the Bay Area hype for Bay Area guys is out of control.

Giving up extra picks for Fleener?! C'mon man.
Apr 23, 2012 at 10:42:31
#38
.
[ Edited by DirtyP on Apr 23, 2012 at 10:42:45 ]
Apr 23, 2012 at 10:47:48
#39
Originally posted by btthepunk:
If we trade up it better be for Michael Floyd.

this
Apr 23, 2012 at 10:50:16
#40
Originally posted by hofer36:
gots to get me some fleener weiner

Apr 23, 2012 at 10:51:48
#41
Originally posted by jreff22:
Originally posted by btthepunk:
If we trade up it better be for Michael Floyd.

this

that
Apr 23, 2012 at 11:12:22
#42
Originally posted by ForeverYoung8:
Originally posted by hofer36:
gots to get me some fleener weiner

Fleener Frenzy, Fleener Frenzy
Apr 23, 2012 at 11:16:50
#43
Originally posted by English:
We already have Davies. Another would be nice. But this is just way too much.

I agree it's way too much to give up for a TE. Now if he's still there at 30... I'd love to see him ligned up with VD and D-Love in a 3 TE set.
Apr 23, 2012 at 11:28:17
#44
Nothing... they either get him at 30 or they don't.
Apr 23, 2012 at 11:33:00
#45
Originally posted by dj43:
I have written in other threads that Fleener would be a game-changer in the 49er offense. I won't repeat my argument here, only to say that rule changes to protect defenseless receivers make a tall receiver like Fleener an essential part of any truly good receiving corp.

That having been said, I do not believe he is worth spending more than a 3rd to move up to get him. The need for a RG/Center is just as great as a tall receiver, hence, BPA is the best route to travel.

However, in a draft that has a lot of talent on the top end, I would not be surprised if Baalke gives up some mid-round choices to move up for a player they feel will be an impact guy. This team does not have a glaring needs hence an impact guy would be worth sacrificing some "depth" choices if it is the right guy. As much as I like Fleener, I am not certain he is worth giving up what the OP suggests.
I agree. Our first and third rounds. But this would be for anybody the front office believes in: e.g., Fleener, Hill, Randle, Glenn, Konz. With the team nearly set, the front office can afford to trade up quantity for quality.
[ Edited by Paul_Hofer on Apr 23, 2012 at 11:36:54 ]
©1997-2013 49erswebzone.com. Part of Skybox 360 Media, LLC
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties
Privacy Statement